You are on page 1of 3

Declinable or Indeclinable?

– ‫االعْراب‬
In Arabic words are divided into two categories: ‫ْرب‬َ ‫( ُمع‬declinable) and ‫َم ْبنِي‬
(indeclinable). In simple terms this concept concerns whether a word can
take changes to its case ending (declinable) or not (indeclinable).

So what causes these changes?

Words can change case-endings for two reasons:


(1) The position they occupy within a sentence [subject, object…] and

(2) They are over-powered by the case of a governing particle.

Examples are below:

(1) Changes caused to a word because of its position in a sentence:


Look at the following sentences: ‘the man read a book’, ‘I saw a man read the
book’, ‘I read the book with the man’. Focus on the the phrase ‘the man’. In
the first sentence ‘the man’ is the subject therefore: ar-rajulu ‫ال َّر ُج ُل‬. In the
second sentence ‘the man’ is the object therefore: ar-rajula ‫ال َّرج َُل‬. In the last
sentence ‘the man’ is majroor therefore ‘ar-rajuli‘ ‫ال َّر ُج ِل‬.This is how words
that are ‫ ُمع َْرب‬change cases depending on their position within a sentence.

(2) Changes caused to a word because of a governing particle: Let’s take


for example prepositions. Imagine a muslim coming across a non-muslim.
The muslim invites the non-muslim to become Muslim. If the non-Muslim
agrees then he has to take the shahadah (declaration of faith) to become
Muslim. He is also no longer called a non-Muslim, he is now called a Muslim.
Now change ‘Muslim’ with harf-jarr ‫ َحرْ ف َجر‬and ‘non-Muslim’ with ism ‫اِسْم‬.
Imagine a ‫ َحرْ ف َجر‬coming across an ‫اِسْم‬. The ‫ َحرْ ف َجر‬ invites the ‫ اِسْم‬to
become ‫ َمجْ رُور‬. The ‫ اِسم‬takes a ‫ َجر‬case ending to become ‫ َمجْ رُور‬. The ‫ اِسْم‬is
now called ‫اِسْم َمجْ رُور‬. An example of this would be ‫ت‬ ٌ ‫ بَي‬+ ‫فِي‬
ٍ ‫ْت = فِي بَ ْي‬

These changes which have occurred are called ‫اال ْعراب‬. ِ Words can be fully
declinable ‘‫ص ِرف‬ َ ‫ ’ ُم ْن‬meaning that the word can take all case endings (e.g. ٌ ٍ ً ).
They can also be partially declinable ‘‫ص ِرف‬ َ ‫ ’ َغ ْي ُر ُم ْن‬meaning that the word
cannot take all case endings (i.e. ُ َ َ ) for example, as mentioned in the
previous post, words such as feminine names cannot take a kasra or tanween
but can take a dhamma or fatha; and therefore it is declinable to an
extent. So, words which accept changes by ‫ال َعوا ِمل‬  (governing elements) are
called ‫ ُمع َْرب‬  and words which cannot change are called ‘‫’ َم ْبنِي‬. So what are the
changes then?
The changes caused by ‫ال َعوا ِمل‬ are of 4 types (‫)الحاالت‬:
1) The nominative case –  ‫َم ْرفُ ْوع‬

ُ ‫َم ْن‬
2) The accusative case –  ‫صوب‬

3) The genitive case –  ‫َم ْج ُرور‬

4) The jussive case –  ‫َم ْج ُز ْوم‬

Once you’ve identified a word’s correct case ending depending on its ‫عَوا ِمل‬
– what are the signs used to indicate this? It is through two ways. Think back
to post week 2 where we formed that table with all the signs and cases and
how case endings are indicated either through diacritics – ‫ ا ِال ْعرابِّ ال َح َركات‬ – or
also through letters – ‫اال ْعرابِّ ال ُحرٌوف‬
ِ .

However not all words accept these changes. These words are called
‫ َم ْبنِي‬ where, despite the ‫ال َعوا ِمل‬ the word retains its positions and diacritics and
does not accept the concept of ‫ا ِال ْعراب‬. In this case the opposite of ‫ا ِال ْعراب‬ 
occurs which is called ‫البَناء‬. We mentioned at the beginning of this post that
words can change for two reasons; because of its position within a sentence
and because it comes after a governing particles which overrides its case
ending. Let’s use those examples again using ‫ َم ْبنِي‬words:

(1) Changes caused to a word because of its position in a sentence: Focus on


‘this man’ within the following three sentences: This man read a book, I saw
this man read the book, I read the book with this man. In each of these
examples we used the demonstrative pronoun ‘this’-‘‫‘هذا‬- this word is ‫َم ْبنِب‬
and although ‫ ال َّرجُل‬takes a different ending in each example ‫ هذا‬remains the
same. Note, however, that although it looks the same in each example
intrinsically the case is still changing.

(2) Changes caused to a word because of a governing particle: If we add a


ٌ ‫هذا البَي‬+ ‫فِي‬
governing particle before a ‫ َم ْبنِي‬word it does not change.  ‫ْت = فِي هذا‬
‫ت‬
ِ ‫اابَ ْي‬
To sum up this information the following chart I put together may prove
useful. It is an indepth breakdown of what type of nouns, verbs and particles
are declinable or indeclinable. It basically shows that:

(1) All nouns are ‫ ُمع َْرب‬with 7 exceptions – these exceptions are ‫ َم ْبنِي‬  only
because they resemble characteristics of the ‫ َم ْبنِي االصل‬. For example,
attached pronouns ‫ض ِميْر‬ َّ ‫ ال‬are ‫ َم ْبنِي‬because they consist of very few letters e.g.
‫ ك‬,‫ ها‬much like particles (one of the ‫) َم ْبنِي االصل‬.

(2) the ‫ َم ْبنِي االصل‬are the original indeclinables meaning that they were
always ‫ َم ْبنِي‬ . There are 3 groups: all particles, the part tense verb (active and
passive) and the command (including prohibition).

(3) This leaves us with the category of present/future tense verbs which are
‫ ُمع َْرب‬. They are ‫ ُم ْع َرب‬because their case ending can change if a governing
particular comes before it. The examples are listed in the box.

Each of the 7 indeclinable nouns will have a post dedicated to them under
this page. That’s all for now and keep a look out for my next nahw post – it
will attempt to summarise the fundementals.

You might also like