Neuroanatomical tract-tracing techniques that did go viral

Lanciego, Jose L.; Wouterlood, Floris G.

doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02041-6

Neuroanatomical tract-tracing techniques that did go viral

Review
Open access
Published: 15 February 2020

Volume 225, pages 1193–1224, (2020)
Cite this article

Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Brain Structure and Function Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Neuroanatomical tract-tracing techniques that did go viral

Download PDF

19k Accesses
53 Citations
8 Altmetric
Explore all metrics

Abstract

Neuroanatomical tracing methods remain fundamental for elucidating the complexity of brain circuits. During the past decades, the technical arsenal at our disposal has been greatly enriched, with a steady supply of fresh arrivals. This paper provides a landscape view of classical and modern tools for tract-tracing purposes. Focus is placed on methods that have gone viral, i.e., became most widespread used and fully reliable. To keep an historical perspective, we start by reviewing one-dimensional, standalone transport-tracing tools; these including today’s two most favorite anterograde neuroanatomical tracers such as Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin and biotinylated dextran amine. Next, emphasis is placed on several classical tools widely used for retrograde neuroanatomical tracing purposes, where Fluoro-Gold in our opinion represents the best example. Furthermore, it is worth noting that multi-dimensional paradigms can be designed by combining different tracers or by applying a given tracer together with detecting one or more neurochemical substances, as illustrated here with several examples. Finally, it is without any doubt that we are currently witnessing the unstoppable and spectacular rise of modern molecular-genetic techniques based on the use of modified viruses as delivery vehicles for genetic material, therefore, pushing the tract-tracing field forward into a new era. In summary, here, we aim to provide neuroscientists with the advice and background required when facing a choice on which neuroanatomical tracer—or combination thereof—might be best suited for addressing a given experimental design.

Generation of ‘semi-guided’ cortical organoids with complex neural oscillations

Article 03 May 2024

BDNF: A Key Factor with Multipotent Impact on Brain Signaling and Synaptic Plasticity

Article Open access 16 June 2017

Cerebellum Lecture: the Cerebellar Nuclei—Core of the Cerebellum

Article Open access 13 February 2023

Introduction: the legacy of the old school

If we go back in time 40 years, consider the state of technology in neuroanatomy in those days and compare with today, two distinctive developments become visible. The first is that 1980 marks the closure of an exciting first decade of neuroanatomical tracing with the revolutionary horseradish peroxidase (HRP) tracing technique. HRP tracing was introduced in 1971 and exploits centripetal neuronal transport in living neurons (Kristensson and Olsson 1971a, b). HRP tracing completely overtook the experimental tracing technique of the day that was based on making lesions followed by detection of the increased argyrophilia of degenerating axons through complex silver staining procedures (Nauta and Gygax 1951; Fink and Heimer 1967).

Around 1980, most axonal tracing occurred within a conceptual frame that was essentially one-dimensional. Neuroanatomy in those days was by tradition completely focused on the aspects of connectivity and cytoarchitectonics. One would simply study projections from area A to area B. Sections were Nissl-counterstained to reveal the underlying cytoarchitectonics, and that was it. Things started to change rapidly in the early 1980s after trailblazing work done by Van der Kooy and Steinbusch (1980). A body of reports began to accumulate in the literature describing two-dimensional tracing procedures in which tracing of connectivity was supplemented with immunohistochemical (functional) identification of neurons and brain areas (e.g., Van der Kooy and Sawchenko 1982; Fallon and Seroogy 1984; Grove et al. 1986; Staiger and Wouterlood 1990; Berendse et al. 1992a). Two- and even multi-dimensional tracing had been anticipated by Gerfen and Sawchenko (1985) when they published their innovative tracing method that utilized the uptake and transport of leucoagglutinating subunit complexes of the red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) lectin (PHA-L, Gerfen and Sawchenko 1984). PHA-L accounted for a true breakthrough, first because axon tracing with the lectin exploited the centrifugal component of metabolic neuronal transport systems, second because the lectin appeared being almost exclusively transported along the axons to the axon terminals (anterograde transport), and third because the detection of transported tracer was based on immunohistochemistry. As these three aspects gave PHA-L tracing superiority compared with existing methods, the lectin was subsequently exploited in a large number of one- and two-dimensional neuroanatomical studies. It should be mentioned at this point that immunohistochemical detection of transported PHA-L makes it relatively easy to combine tracing with a second immunostaining detection procedure, depending on the availability of proper antibody combinations. Thus, it can be stated that the introduction of PHA-L marked the beginning of the age of multi-dimensional anterograde tracing. Among the first to capitalize on the new opportunities were Grove et al. (1986) who, using PHA-L tracing combined with acetylcholinesterase staining, investigated striatal efferent projections with emphasis on juxtaposition of PHA-L labeled fibers and acetylcholinesterase positive (i.e., cholinergic) neurons in globus pallidus. The introduction of high-resolution confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) imaging in the mid-1990s combined with the availability of antibodies conjugated to new, fading-resistant fluorochromes, made multi-dimensional tracing easier and more accurate than ever before (cf. Zaborszky et al. 2006). It can be argued that the bottom line in neuroanatomical tracing has evolved from one-dimensional studies in 1990 to at least two-dimensional work today.

The second aspect of axonal tracing anno 1980 was that it was embedded in a single, well-outlined discipline, i.e., neuroanatomy, with a few links with other disciplines. Also this type of one-dimensionality that was so typical for early- to mid-twentieth century science has been changed in a relatively compact time frame into multi-disciplinary approaches that integrate neuroscience, molecular, cell biology, genetic, and neurophysiological methods. Most progress in this respect has been experienced in tracing with viruses such as further outlined in the section “The slow, unstoppable rise of viruses as tracing tools”. The first of these agents (Herpes Simplex virus-1) had been introduced in the early 1970s as a one-dimensional, retrograde tracing tool (Kristensson et al. 1974). Viruses were further explored as neuroanatomical tracing tools by Ugolini and Kuypers (1986), Ugolini (1995), Strack and Loewy (1990) and, combined with genetics and molecular biology, took off after the turn of the twenty-first century in a spectacular way. Note that in the early studies, replication of the virus was the process driving the tracing method, with viral capsule antigen detection as the reporter. The introduction of adeno-associated viruses (AAV) as a delivery vehicle of altered genes to force neurons to express green florescent protein (GFP) (Peel et al. 1997) can be considered as one of the milestones in neuroscience, because it triggered transformation of the field from several essentially one-dimensional disciplines into the big, multi-dimensional molecular-genetic-tracing-functional spectrum that we experience today. A similar thing happened in parallel with neurophysiological and molecular-genetic methods which resulted in the current field of optogenetics.

Neuroanatomical tracing with transport methods

The aim of neuroanatomical tracing is to reveal the extremely complicated connectional relationships between neurons within the confinement of grey cerebral matter in a nucleus or cortical layer and, at a larger scale, connectivity between brain areas. The challenge is in its essence presented in Fig. 1: connectivity between two nuclei, each with its own set of projection neurons and interneurons. This scheme is used in Figs. 2, 5, 10, and 11 as a template, wherein the essentials of various tracing and marking/imaging techniques are explained.

Anterograde axonal tracing with Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L)

Four leucocyte agglutinating lectin subunits extracted from the red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) form a complex (PHA-L) that, deposited into a selected spot in grey matter in the CNS (for instance a cortical layer, subcortical nucleus, or spinal cord funiculus), is taken up by neurons. Label is homogeneously distributed inside the cytoplasm of the cell bodies, dendrites, and axons of labeled neurons. The large lectin molecules apparently link to the neuron’s internal transport system and get carried inside the axons all the way to the axon terminals (Fig. 2a). Detection is with antibodies against PHA-L.

The characteristics of PHA-L as an exclusive anterograde neuroanatomical tracer were described first by Gerfen and Sawchenko (1984). These authors noted that PHA-L fills neurons into all their nooks and crannies, revealing their most delicate morphological details (reviewed in Groenewegen and Wouterlood 1990). Detection is with a proper antibody. The reward of all the surgical and immunohistochemical effort is an exquisite, eye pleasing visualization of cell bodies, dendrites, and the entire trajectories of projection fibers including axon collaterals, terminal branches, and terminal boutons. PHA-L immunoreaction product viewed in the electron microscope is a homogeneously distributed electron dense substance occupying the matrix of the labeled fibers and axon terminals (Wouterlood and Groenewegen 1985; Smith 1992) [although this homogeneity depends to some degree on antibody penetration into the tissue sections, see Wouterlood et al. (1990)]. An attractive property of PHA-L is that, given suitable combinations of antibodies and chromogens in the immunohistochemical detection, multilabel experiments are within reach that may extract functional information from the labeled neurons. The prospect for such multi-dimensional experiments, wherein anterograde axonal tracing based on PHA-L transport would be one (principal) component, was already foresighted by Gerfen and Sawchenko in their second paper on the application of PHA-L (Gerfen and Sawchenko, 1985). It should be noted here that PHA-L does not naturally occur in brain tissue and for that matter does not contribute to background (if there is background staining, this is most probably caused by non-specific antibody binding). This ‘exoneuronal’ feature of PHA-L makes the tracer so well suited for combination with immunostaining of all kinds of neuroactive substances, metabolic enzymes, receptors, and transport proteins.

PHA-L tracing protocol

General

Animals are anesthetized and introduced into a stereotaxic apparatus. An opening is made in the skull, the meninges cut, and the surface of the brain exposed.

Injection

A glass micropipette with a tip opening of 10–30 μm in diameter containing 2.5% PHA-L in 50-mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, is lowered into the brain to the desired stereotaxic coordinates. If the tip-opening diameter exceeds 30 μm, a fair chance exists that an injection blob develops without signs of uptake and transport (Groenewegen and Wouterlood 1990). Very small injection spots including, say, 25 neurons are associated with the use of pipettes with tip diameter of 10 μm or less. Injection sites may measure up to 1000 μm in diameter (e.g., Fig. 3a), but their geometry depends on structural factors, e.g., the presence of bundles or sheets of myelinated fibers or the orientation of dendrites of local neurons. Application is iontophoretic, with a positive DC current of 10 μA, pulsed, 7 s on, 7 s off. The power source should be of the constant current type and capable of producing a high voltage to maintain the set current. After injection, the pipette is left in place for 10 min and then slowly retracted to avoid pipette track labeling.

That the uptake results in spread of label in particular in the cytosolic compartment of neurons suggests uptake via an electroporation phenomenon: the high-voltage iontophoretic pulses structurally change outer envelope membrane properties of neurons temporarily, that is, within a certain radius from the pipette tip position. The nanopores thus formed in the fluid membranes enveloping neurons allow externally deposited material to enter the cytoplasm. Electroporation is often used as a tool in many molecular biology transfection applications (Washbourne and McAllister 2002; Karra and Dahm 2010). The limited diameter of injection spots is consistent with the electroporation explanation. Once in the cytosol, the lectin must be picked up by intracellular transport systems, since one can define a ‘transport’ time.

Post-injection

Post-surgery survival time is not very critical. In rats, 1–3 weeks are usually sufficient to label intracerebral pathways. Transport speed is in the range of 5–6 mm per day (Gerfen and Sawchenko 1984). In rats, transported PHA-L can be detected with high quality up to 4 weeks after application, after which the details of labeling slowly start to deteriorate (Wouterlood et al. 1990). We routinely use for intracerebral connectivity experiments in rats a post-surgery transport time of 1 week. Next, the experimental animals are deeply anesthetized and transcardially perfused with 4% freshly depolymerized paraformaldehyde in 125-mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.6. A trace of glutaraldehyde (0.1–0.5%) may be added. We prefer a flush with carbon dioxide-bubbled Ringer solution at the beginning of the perfusion (cf. Friedrich and Mugnaini 1981). The brain is recovered from the skull immediately after the fixation procedure and either sectioned the same day on a vibrating microtome or equilibrated overnight in 20% DMSO-2% glycerin in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, before cutting sections on a freezing microtome. Section thickness usually is 40 μm. Sections can be stored long-term at − 20 °C or colder in a cryoprotectant consisting of 20% glycerin and 2% dimethylsulfoxide in 100-mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (Rosene et al. 1986). We have successfully stained sections of rat brain stored for more than 20 years under these conditions (Wouterlood et al. 2018a).

Incubation

Immunohistochemistry is routinely conducted with free-floating sections. The main incubation vehicle is TBS-TX: Tris-buffered saline, pH 8.0, with 0.5% Triton X-100 added. During all incubations, rinses, and reactions, the vials with the sections are gently rocked on a rocking plateau. Rinse between each step 3 × 10 min with TBS-TX unless otherwise specified.

Recipe for one-dimensional PHA-L detection

Block 1 h in 10% normal rabbit serum in TBS-TX to suppress non-specific background.
Incubate overnight in primary antibody (e.g., goat-anti-PHA-L,1:2000) at room temperature (or over the weekend in a refrigerator).
Incubate 2 h in secondary antibody (here a 1:200 rabbit–anti-goat IgG).
Incubate 1 h in a goat-peroxidase–antiperoxidase complex (1:800).
Rinse 3 × 10 min in TBS-TX and twice briefly in TBS, pH 7.6 to remove the detergent.
Transfer to 50-mM Tris, pH 7.6.
Incubate in diaminobenzidine (DAB). DAB solution is prepared fresh by dissolving 5-mg 3-3′ diaminobenzidine-HCl (Sigma) in 10-ml 50-mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6. After filtering, 3.3-μl 30% H₂O₂ (Merck) is added just before use. Hydrogen peroxide acts as the electron acceptor that powers the reaction (Graham and Karnovsky, 1965). Caution! Diaminobenzidine is a suspect carcinogenic.

After the immunostaining, the sections are mounted on gelatinized slides, dried, counterstained if necessary, and coverslipped with a synthetic mounting medium. Figure 3a shows a PHA-L injection site with the typical brown classical peroxidase staining reaction product, photographed at low magnification in a standard photomicroscope.

Immunofluorescence detection

Fairly soon after robust specific fluorochromes and powerful fluorescence imaging systems became available in the second half of the 1990s, we switched from classical immunoperoxidase staining to immunofluorescence staining. The latter involves standard incubation with the primary antibody: a goat or rabbit antibody against PHA-L. The next incubation step is a 2-h incubation in rabbit–anti-goat IgG (or goat–anti-rabbit IgG) conjugated to a fluorochrome with an excitation wavelength of choice. A typical PHA-L injection site in fluorescence imaging is shown in Fig. 3c. This particular image is a mosaic of six overlapping image ‘tiles’ acquired in a confocal laser scanning microscope. Each ‘tile’ of the mosaic is a Z-projection of ten confocal images taken at incremental equidistant steps along the optical axis of the confocal instrument. Today, the arsenal of commercially available secondary antibody-fluorochrome conjugates is immense; after initially applying carbocyanine fluorochromes (Cy2^®, Cy3^®, Cy5^®), we started working with the Alexa Fluor^® series of antibody conjugates from which we select a particular member depending on the spectral characteristics of our confocal laser scanning instrument, e.g., an Alexa Fluor^® 488 conjugated secondary antibody that emits green fluorescence in a confocal laser scanning microscope when excited with monochromatic 488 nm laser light (e.g., Figure 3c).

Advantages and disadvantages

The main advantage of PHA-L is the sublime quality of detail that the labeling produces (Figs. 3c–e, 4b, d, 7). Transport is nearly exclusively anterograde. Retrograde transport manifests itself as granular deposits in neuronal cell bodies with conspicuous absence of cellular detail. There appears little if no uptake by fibers of passage (Gerfen and Sawchenko 1984). The tracer has been used in many mammalian species: rat, mouse (Cipolloni et al. 1985; Hoogland et al. 1991; Ma et al. 2016), hamster (Rhoades et al. 1989), guinea pig (Thompson and Thompson 1987), cat (Otake et al. 1988), squirrel monkey (Smith et al. 1990), and macaque monkey (Rockland 1995; Amaral et al. 2014; Morecraft et al. 2017), but also in amphibians (frog: Kulik et al. 1994), reptiles (Russchen and Jonker 1988) and birds (Husband and Shimizu 1999). Neuroanatomical tracing with PHA-L in fish species is conspicuously absent in the literature.

One handicap in using PHA-L is that iontophoretic application is necessary through a micropipette. Injection spots are, therefore, small. Single, pressure injections of larger volumes have been reported; however, these often produce a central necrotic spot at the deposition locus. A workaround if larger areas need to be supplied with tracer is to cover such an area with multiple small injections.

If iontophoretic application fails for some reason, one may experience after staining a disappointing ‘cloud’ of brown reaction product in the injection spot instead of labeled neurons and neuronal processes. A suspected cause here is an irregular micropipette tip. Taken together, in all our PHA-L tracing experiments over the years together, we experienced a global deposition failure rate of, say, 10%.

In non-human primates, in contrast to its efficacy in rodents (e.g., corticospinal tract tracing in rat; Liang et al. 1991), regardless of transport distances, anterograde labeling with PHA-L seems primarily valuable to study short-terminal projections (Morecraft et al. 2009, 2017). An impressive study with intracerebral fiber connectivity in primates is Amaral et al.’s (2014) work in newborn macaque monkeys, wherein three tracers were tested: a radioautographic tracer (discussed in Section“Tritiated amino acids and radioautography”), PHA-L, and BDA [the latter discussed in detail in section “Axonal tracing with biotinylated dextran amine (BDA)]”.

One may consider the immunohistochemical detection of transported PHA-L as a disadvantage when a multi-dimensional approach is planned, since one may run out of suitable combinations of primary and secondary antibodies, especially when the detection of a second marker or third marker requires a highly specific or exclusive primary antibody.

Multi-dimensional tracing with PHA-L

Multi-dimensional tracing includes neuroanatomical tracing combined with one or more additional techniques designed to specifically visualize a second marker or third marker. Such a marker can be one that defines cytoarchitectonic borders, an additional anterograde or retrograde tracer, a neurotransmission-related marker, or some marker that identifies potential post-synaptic neurons and their processes. Originally, research of this type was conducted with non-fluorescent reporter markers (Wouterlood et al. 1987; Antal et al. 1990; Lanciego et al. 2000; Lanciego and Wouterlood 2011), while Aarnisalo and Panula pioneered with fluorescence reporting (Aarnisalo and Panula 1995). An example that suits the modern ‘fluorescence age’ combines PHA-L tracing with labeling of a small population of prospective target neurons with neurobiotin (Figs. 3d, 4a–c, g). Neurobiotin as a tracer is discussed in section "Biotin derivatives and carbocyanine dyes".

Labeling of axon terminals and their (presumed) post-synaptic targets

Once a bundle of fibers is labeled with PHA-L and the distribution of individual fibers in the target areas of the fiber projection is charted, one may want to identify neurons post-synaptic to the labeled axon terminals. For this purpose, PHA-L tracing can be combined with an additional technique that produces specific label inside neurons that may be targeted by the PHA-L-labeled projection. Often applied is a double-immunohistochemical procedure that includes detection of PHA-L and detection of the secondary marker. The latter is usually done via an antibody that highlights a specific type of neuron (presumed GABAergic, peptidergic, cholinergic, or dopaminergic targeted neurons, to name just a few). Initial attempts in this realm included experiments with ‘absorption’ tags, that is visualization with different light absorption (‘colored’) chromogens such as diaminobenzidine (brown precipitate), nickel-enhanced diaminobenzidine (black precipitate), tetramethylbenzidine (dark blue precipitate), and Vector VIP™ (magenta precipitate) (Wouterlood et al. 1987; Lanciego et al. 1997, 2000; Köbbert et al. 2000; Gonzalo et al. 2001; Lanciego and Wouterlood 2011 (review); Unal et al. 2014), while the introduction of confocal laser microscopy, and in parallel the introduction of robust fluorochromes, delivered resolution high enough to reliably detect markers even inside thin fragile fibers and axon varicosities (Wouterlood et al. 2007). Most work, nowadays, published in this field is documented with confocal microscopy (e.g., Boulland et al. 2009; Barbier et al. 2018). While a sequential procedure for detection of the involved markers is possible (e.g., Barbier et al. 2018), we prefer incubations with antibody cocktails to economize on the time running an experiment. We briefly present two examples.

Example A is from a study in the rat of fiber projections from the presubiculum to medial parahippocampal cortex. The presubiculum mediates transfer of information from retrospenial cortex to the hippocampus (Kononenko and Witter, 2012). The recipients here are the apical dendrites in superficial layers of parahippocampal neurons whose cell bodies are located deep in layer V (reported in Wouterlood et al. 2004).

Example B deals with appositions of perforant pathway terminal fibers and axon terminals with dendritic branches that are part of apical tufts of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. The perforant pathway was labeled in rats via injection of PHA-L in layers II–III of medial parahippocampal cortex, while the hippocampal CA1 neurons were intracellularly injected with Alexa Fluor^® 555 (AF555) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The entire procedure and the obtained results were published by Kajiwara et al. (2008).

Protocol

Injections with PHA-L were made in their respective loci according to the procedure outlined in the section ‘Injection’ of the PHA-L tracing protocol. The rats of example A were 1–4 days later, but always 48 h prior to sacrifice, re-anesthetized and re-introduced in the stereotaxic frame. A micropipette with a tip-opening diameter of 5–10 μm was filled with Neurobiotin™ and lowered to the desired position in the deep layers of the ipsilateral medial entorhinal cortex (MEA). Neurobiotin and PHA-L were both iontophoretically injected, with identical parameters (see PHA-L tracing protocol).

In both examples, we cut the brains, after sacrifice according to the PHA-L tracing procedure described above, into sections on a vibrating microtome. Standard section thickness is 40 μm, but in the experiments in which we applied intracellular injections (example B), we cut slices of 400-μm thick alternated with 100 μm-thick slices. During all incubations, rinses, and reactions, the vials with the sections are gently rocked on a rocking plateau. Rinse between each step 3 × 10 min with TBS-TX unless otherwise specified.

Example A: (double staining of free-floating sections)

Block 1 h in 5% normal goat serum in TBS-TX.
Incubate 48 h with rabbit anti-PHA-L antibodies (1:2000 in TBS-TX in a refrigerator).
Incubate 1 h with a cocktail of 1:400 goat-anti-rabbit-Cy5^® mixed with streptavidin-Alexa Fluor^® 488 (in TBS-TX).
Rinse the sections 3 × 10 min in TBS-TX, then briefly twice in TBS and then transfer to Tris–HCl, pH 7.4.
Park in Tris–HCl, pH 7.4 for a short period awaiting mounting and coverslipping.

Example B:

Place slices containing hippocampus in a Petri dish in a fixed-stage microscope equipped with a three-axis micromanipulator (Buhl and Lübke 1989).
Approach cell bodies of CA1 neurons and impale them: glass micropipettes (tip-opening diameter was 0.5–0.8 μm) attached to a micromanipulator. Micropipettes contain 10-mM Alexa Fluor^® 555 hydrazide (AF555) in phosphate buffer, pH 7.6. Inject via microiontophoresis (2-nA current). Successfully impaled/injected CA1 neurons light up red under green fluorescence illumination. AF555, once introduced in a neuron, acts as a robust intrinsic fluorescent staining that does not need additional enhancement and that survives the subsequent immunofluorescence incubation procedure,
Resection the slices after injection into a series of 50 μm-thick second-generation sections on a freezing microtome.
Incubate 72 h in 1:2000 anti-PHA-L raised in rabbit, in TBS-TX.
Incubate 2 h in 1:400 goat–anti-rabbit-Alexa Fluor^® 488, in TBS-TX.
Rinse the sections 3 × 10 min in TBS-TX.
Rinse briefly twice in TBS to remove the detergent.
Rinse in Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, and park in this medium for a short period awaiting mounting and coverslipping.

Mounting and coverslipping procedure for fluorescence imaging

Sections were recovered from the parking, once more rinsed in Tris–HCl, mounted on 1% gelatin (Oxoid) coated glass slides and then thoroughly dried. This drying is critical for confocal microscopy, since traces of water will render the sections opaque. Imperfectly cleared sections will hamper imaging efficiency, because once a laser excites the fluorochrome molecules, a sizable fraction of the emitted photons will become absorbed by the tissue and, hence, never reach the detector.

Coverslipping is done by first dipping the slides with the thoroughly dried sections in analytical grade toluene for 30 s. Immediately afterwards, a drop of synthetic resin is applied and the coverslip put in place. The sections are then ready for immediate inspection in a fluorescence microscope. However, to avoid contamination of the microscope with sticky resin, it is advised to dry the slides first for 24 h in a dark drying cabinet at 30–40 °C. Final storage is in a freezer at − 20 °C.

Imaging

Slides belonging to examples A and B were studied in a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM; Leica TCS-SP2 AOBS). This instrument is equipped with 488-, 546-, and 647-nm lasers. 488-nm laser light was used to excite Alexa Fluor^® 488 associated with neurobiotin (example A) or PHA-L (example B); 647-nm laser light excited the Cy5 attached to the PHA-L labeled fibers (example A), whereas the 546-nm laser light excited AF555 in the CA1 neurons of example B. The instrument was always operated in sequential Z-scanning mode in two channels (example A: ‘green’ channel; excitation 488 nm, emission peak at 519 nm and ‘infrared’ channel: excitation 647 nm, emission peak at 670 nm; example B: ‘green’ channel; excitation 488 nm, emission peak at 519 nm and ‘red’ channel: excitation 546 nm, emission peak at 568 nm). The objective lens was a 63× plan apochromat NA 1.3 glycerin immersion lens; electronic zoom was 8×; and image dimensions were 512 × 512 pixels, 256 grey intensity levels (8 bit). Y-stepping was a calibrated 55 nm. Structures were 3D rendered using Amira™ software (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Results are illustrated in the low-magnification photomontage of Fig. 3d–e, and in the high-magnification images of Fig. 4a–f.

Note on diffraction-limited imaging

Study of contacts between tracer-labeled axon terminals (diameter 0.5–0.8 μm and prospective post-synaptic target neurons (dendritic spine size approximately 0.5 μm) requires high magnification. Here, we descend deeply into the blurry realm of Abbe diffraction limitation, wherein structures require super-resolution imaging to make them properly visible. To improve the resolution of our imaging system, we digitally processed the acquired image stacks with dedicated deconvolution software (Huygens™; SVI, Hilversum, The Netherlands) prior to 3D reconstruction (i.e., all high-magnification images shown in this paper).

Analysis of acquired images

Already at low magnification, the PHA-L-labeled fibers in sections in both examples formed a band of terminal fiber labeling. Presubiculum fibers ending in medial parahippocampal cortex (example A) occupy layers II–III densely, while layer I has scattered fibers (Fig. 3d). Perforant pathway labeling in hippocampal field CA1 (example B) consists of a very well-delineated dense ‘cloud’ in stratum lacunosum moleculare (LM, Fig. 3e). At high resolution, numerous occasions could be seen of swellings of PHA-L-labeled fibers (interpreted as boutons, axon terminals) in apposition (‘contact’) with dendrites labeled with the second label (Fig. 4c, f and the 3D reconstructions in Figs. 4g, h). Physical contacts of this type are necessary anatomical substrates in terms of pre- and post-synaptic structures. We demonstrated the presence of synapses separately, with electron microscopy (Wouterlood et al. 2004). Similar observations of appositions were made by Kononenko and Witter (2012) in their study of recipient fibers in layer III of medial parahippocampal cortex. The presence of a contact does not necessarily mean, however, that there is a functional synapse; additional verification is required. In a separate study (Wouterlood et al. 2003), we have shown the presence of the typical post-synaptic density anchoring protein, ProSAp1/Shank B (Boeckers et al. 1999; Raab et al. 2010) sandwiched in between labeled presynaptic fibers, and presumed post-synaptic neurons. Such a sandwich more convincingly indicates the presence of a synapse than ‘merely’ an apposition

Axonal tracing with biotinylated dextran amine (BDA)

The early transport-tracing methods leaned on cellular centripetal transport mechanisms. The need to expand the repertoire of anterograde techniques beyond radioautographic methods (see the section “Tritiated amino acids and radioautography”) and (bidirectionally) transported WGA-HRP (see the section “Non-fluorescent and fluorescent retrograde tracing”) was satisfied in 1984 with the introduction of PHA-L (Gerfen and Sawchenko 1984, 1985). Research continued afterwards to find alternative tracers. After Glover et al. (1986) had introduced dextran amine conjugated to selected fluorescent dyes as a novel, yet retrograde, neuroanatomical tract-tracing macromolecule, dextran amine again came into the spotlight when a major anterograde transport component was reported (Nance and Burns 1990; Schmued et al. 1990; Fritzsch and Wilm 1990; Chang et al. 1990). Veenman et al. (1992) publication, immediately followed by one authored by Brandt and Apkarian (1992), brought biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) to center stage as an anterograde neuroanatomical tracer. Dextran molecules, dextran amines, and their conjugates are taken up via an unknown mechanism by dendrites and neuronal cell bodies, and transported to a large degree in the anterograde direction (Reiner et al. 2000; Reiner and Honig 2006) (Fig. 2, schematic). Biotinylated dextran amine conjugated to lysine, MW 10 kD (supplier Invitrogen-Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) is the most popular among the dextran amines. BDA has been used as tracer in all classes of vertebrates, including fish species (Xue et al. 2001; Northcutt 2011).

BDA tracing protocol

Application

BDA is dissolved prior to use in 10-mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.25 (5–10%, rodents; 10%. primates). This solution is usually injected under stereotaxic guidance into the CNS via iontophoresis or through a mechanical injection (Reiner et al. 2000).

For small rodents, a glass micropipette (tip-opening diameter 20–40 μm) is filled with BDA solution. Typical iontophoretic application into rat brain is through a 5-μA positive pulsed direct current (7 s on/off) on. The same equipment as for PHA-L injections can be used.

Survival time is in proportion to the length of the projection under study. Transport is estimated to span 15–20 mm of tract in 1 week (Reiner et al. 1993). In rats, we use 1 week of survival time. BDA remains stable in the rodent brain up to 4 weeks post-injection, while in primates, it may remain detectable up to 7 weeks after application.

Fixation and detection

BDA tolerates a wide variety of fixatives. This is important if electron microscopy is on the horizon. Because BDA detection depends on penetration of tagged streptavidin into the tissue sections instead of (much larger) antibodies, a better compromise between penetration and preservation of ultrastructure can be obtained than with PHA-L (Wouterlood and Jorritsma-Byham 1993). In rodents, we prefer for light microscopy a fixative that allows additional immunohistochemistry: buffered 4% formaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde, and 0.25% of a saturated picric acid solution. After fixation, the brain can be cut with any of the available sectioning methods. We have processed sections with thickness ranging between 40 and 400 μm.

Detection of transported BDA is very simple and straightforward: incubation with one of the many commercially available tagged (strept)avidins. An irreversible reaction occurs between biotin and avidin that results in a stable product. The tag can be a fluorochrome, horseradish peroxidase, or even biotin (followed by incubation with biotinylated streptavidin to amplify signal). While fluorochrome-tagged, bound avidin can be seen directly in a fluorescence microscope, visualization of bound horseradish peroxidase needs an extra diaminobenzidine-peroxide chromogen reaction.

If application fails for some reason, the sections usually look similar to failed PHA-L application: a vague ‘cloud’ of brown reaction product or some disappointing diffuse fluorescence in the injection spot instead of discrete, labeled neurons, and neuronal processes. However, BDA in tracing experiments less frequently fails in our experience than PHA-L.

Recipe for one-dimensional BDA detection

The main incubation vehicle is TBS-TX (Tris-buffered saline, pH 8, 0, with 0.5% Triton X-100 added). During all incubations, rinses, and reactions, the vials with the sections are gently rocked on a rocking plateau. Rinse between each step 3 × 10 min with TBS-TX unless otherwise specified.

Incubate with streptavidin-peroxidase 1:400: overnight at room temperature, or 24 h in a refrigerator.
Rinse twice in TBS, pH 7.6, to remove the detergent.
Rinse in 50-mM Tris, pH 7.6.
Conduct a monitored incubation in diaminobenzidine (DAB). DAB solution is freshly prepared by dissolving 5 mg 3-3′ diaminobenzidine-HCl (Sigma) in 10-ml 50-mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6. After filtering, 3.3-μl 30% H₂O₂ (Merck) is added just before use.
Rinse and park in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6.

Mounting and coverslipping are identical to the procedure with sections in PHA-L tracing.

Results with BDA tracing

In a neuron that has taken up BDA, the tracer fills the matrix homogeneously. Background staining usually is negligible (this is extremely helpful in high-resolution confocal laser scanning microscopy where every emitted photon that reaches the microscope’s detector counts). All the details of the labeled neurons in the injection sites, e.g., dendritic spines, are available for inspection. Most important is that for the eye, the tracer appears equally distributed along the entire trajectories of fibers. This feature allows extremely precise mapping of fiber tracts, the analysis of the compartmentation of large fascicles and association bundles, and the study of terminal projection patterns. In the electron microscope, the label generated by BDA processing occurs in cytoplasmic compartments of the perikaryon, the main dendrites, their branches, branchlets, and spines, and in fibers, varicosities, and axon terminals. Nuclei sometimes contain BDA-reaction product. When utmost care is taken, ultrastructural detail can be preserved so well that synaptic vesicles and pre- and post-synaptic membrane densities of labeled axon terminals can be appreciated (Wouterlood and Jorritsma-Byham 1993). Retrograde transport of BDA may occur, resulting in a granular deposit of the tracer in a limited number of neuronal perikarya but sometimes complete or ‘dense’ labeling is present of cell bodies and dendrites in areas known to project to the site of injection (Reiner et al. 1993). In particular, pyramidal neurons in cerebral cortex show a tendency to accumulate retrogradely transported BDA. For instance, in experiment 2012-08 shown in Fig. 3a, b, cortical pyramidal neurons became retrogradely labeled after injection of the tracer into the caudate putamen. When such retrograde labeling occurs, the investigator should be aware of the possibility of ‘false’ anterograde labeling of collateral fibers of these, initially retrogradely labeled, neurons (see also Chen and Aston-Jones 1998).

Advantages and disadvantages

BDA tracing has a high success rate and the detection of transported tracer does not require antibodies. In addition, the tracer is very tolerant to fixative composition. These three features render BDA highly efficient and make it attractive to apply BDA in multi-dimensional tracing studies, even in spite of the disadvantage of the retrograde transport component. The latter was even exploited by Bácskai et al. (2010) who applied two fluorescent dextran amine derivatives: tetramethylrhodamine dextran amine (RDA) and fluorescein-dextran amine (FDA), contralateral to each other to the cut ends of the hypoglossal nerve in the frog, Rana esculenta. The experiment was conducted to study the relationships of hypoglossal motoneurons across the midline of the brain stem.

Its versatility, together with the ease of application, the straightforwardness, and speed of the staining protocol, and on top of this the reliability, even compared with PHA-L, has made BDA a widely applied and successful neuroanatomical tracer. At present, BDA undoubtedly represents the first choice anterograde tracer (Lanciego and Wouterlood 2011). BDA also compares good with modern, recombinant virus-based tracing (Wang et al. 2014).

The availability of multiwavelength confocal laser scanning microscopes with good signal separation has made it possible to conduct, for instance, three-dimensional experiments, e.g., application of BDA and PHA-L as tracers plus an additional marker pinpointing a neurotransmitter or other neuroactive substance. Injection of BDA in locus A and, in the same surgical session, of PHA-L in locus B (Herrera et al. 1994) opens ways to study in detail the anatomical convergence or divergence of neuronal connectivity. It also allows the study of connectivity in long neuronal circuits (reviewed in Lanciego and Wouterlood 2006). In non-human primates, and in contrast to its efficacy in rodents, regardless of transport distances, anterograde labeling with PHA-L seems primarily valuable to study short-terminal projections (Morecraft et al. 2009).

Multi-dimensional BDA tracing: neurochemical fingerprinting

Once a bundle of fibers is labeled and the distribution of individual fibers in an area where fibers project to is made visible, it may be worth to determine whether a particular neurotransmission-related marker is present inside the labeled fibers and terminals. This type of functional identification is further called ‘neurochemical fingerprinting’. Noteworthy, neurochemical fingerprinting avant la lettre was conducted in 1995 by Aarnisalo and Panula on possible colocalization in PHA-L-labeled medial hypothalamic neuron fibers of neuropeptide FF. The researchers used available, classical FITC–TRITC double immunofluorescence histochemistry, while imaging was achieved with standard fluorescence microscopy. Two conditions have to be met, however, to convincingly conduct this type of research. The double immunohistochemistry should be done with robust fluorochromes, while second and most importantly, high-resolution confocal microscopy is required, because only this kind of microscopy is capable of imaging colocalization with high confidence in very small, diffraction-limited objects such as axon terminals. Both PHA-L and BDA can be used as the projection fiber marker. For instance, Gautier et al. (2017) combined tracing with PHA-L as axonal tracer with 5HT immunohistochemistry to study serotonergic bulbospinal projections in rats. We prefer BDA as the axonal tracer, because its visualization does not depend on immunohistochemistry, leaving us with maximum immunohistochemical maneuverability to detect the second or third marker, while we operate at the limits of light microscope resolution.

The direct streptavidin-based detection of transported BDA detection represents added value, because it greatly facilitates application of BDA in multi-dimensional studies. Experiments may include multiple tracing paradigms as well as several molecular biology protocols. An example of a multiple tracing paradigm is the combination of anterograde BDA tracing with dual-retrograde tracing with cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) and Fluoro-Gold (FG), both in rodents and in non-human primates (Lanciego et al. 1998a, b; Erro et al. 1999; Lanciego et al. 2000, 2004; Castle et al. 2005). Furthermore, BDA performs nicely when combined with PHA-L (double anterograde tract-tracing, see Lanciego and Wouterlood 1994), or with PHA-L as two anterograde tracers in combination with retrograde tracing with rabies virus (triple neuroanatomical tracing; Fig. 7a, b; see Salin et al. 2008; López et al. 2010). Finally, it is noteworthy that BDA can also be combined with newly available tools for molecular biology, such as the so-called in situ proximity ligation assay (PLA). Initially introduced by Söderberg et al. (2008), PLA was designed to disclose interactions between two proteins when located very close to each other, enabling the accurate localization of places where these interactions are taking place. In the past few years, PLA has become increasingly popular for the visualization of heterodimeric complexes made of two different G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this regard, the combination of PLA and retrograde tracing with BDA allows the identification of GPCR heteromers within neurons innervating a given brain area where BDA was delivered (example E; Fig. 8A,B; Rico et al. 2017).

Example C: VGluT1 or -2 in BDA-labeled fibers and endings Three vesicular glutamate transporters (VGluTs) so far have been identified in brain. These are proteins located in the walls of synaptic vesicles in glutamatergic neurons. A VGluT binds cytoplasmic glutamate, carries it across the membrane and releases it into the lumen of the vesicle (review in Liguz-Lecznar and Skangiel-Kramska 2007). VGluTs thus can be said to be in charge of payloading synaptic vesicles with neurotransmitter. In the case of VGluT1 and VGluT2, the payload exclusively is glutamate, while with VGluT3, several neurotransmitters have been associated (Liguz-Lecznar and Skangiel-Kramska, 2007). The existence of a VGluT1 or VGluT2 in an axon terminal can be exploited as it signals excitatory neurotransmission. VGluT1 has been associated with neurons involved in corticofugal projections, whereas VGluT would be present in neurons involved in subcortical connectivity (Fremeau et al. 2004). VGluT1 and VGluT2 are seldomly co-expressed by neurons. Anterograde neuroanatomical tracing combined with VGluT detection provides a two-dimensional tool (‘neurochemical fingerprinting’) through which one can study excitatory, glutamatergic projections in detail (Fig. 5a, schematic). Prerequisites for successful application of neurochemical fingerprinting are high-resolution anterograde tracing, good fixation, highly specific immunostaining, and high-resolution double-fluorescence confocal microscopy. Here, we investigated whether amygdalostriatal connectivity contains VGluT1 or VGluT2, that is, can be associated with excitatory amygdaloid action upon the striatum.

In rats, BDA was injected into nuclei of the amygdaloid complex (Fig. 6a). Following the above post-surgery procedure, sections containing BDA-labeled fibers were, after rinsing and blocking (5% donkey normal serum) steps, incubated overnight at room temperature in cocktails of two antibodies: guinea pig anti-VGluT1 and rabbit anti-VGluT2 [1:1000; next, the sections were rinsed three times in TBS-TX and incubated with a cocktail made up of streptavidin-Alexa Fluor^® 546 (1:400; Molecular Probes) donkey anti-rabbit-Alexa Fluor^® 488 and donkey anti-guinea pig-Alexa Fluor^® 633 (1:400; Molecular Probes)]. After rinsing the standard BDA mounting-coverslipping procedure was followed. In essence, we had three tags: VGluT1 green, BDA-labeled fiber red, and VGluT2 infrared fluorescence.

These slides were scanned in a Leica TCS-SP2 AOBS confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with 488 nm, 546 nm, and 647 nm lasers. We found extensive distribution of amygdaloid fibers in the ventral striatum in cases with BDA injection in the basomedial nucleus (example injection site in Fig. 6a). BDA-labeled amygdalostriatal fibers contained immunofluorescence signal associated mostly with VGluT1 (Fig. 6b–f, inset Fig. 6f) and, to a lesser degree, with VGluT2. Colocalization of VGluT1 and VGluT2 was extremely rare (Wouterlood et al. 2018a).

Example D: dual-anterograde tracing with PHA-L and BDA combined with retrograde tracing with rabies virus Here, our goal was to elucidate (glutamatergic) afferents reaching striatofugal neurons projecting to the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) in rats. For this purpose, a multi-tracing paradigm was designed comprising iontophoretic delivery of PHA-L into primary motor cortex, iontophoretic delivery of BDA into the parafascicular thalamic complex, and deposit of rabies virus (pressure-injected) into the SNr. After 1 week post-surgery survival, animals were perfused and stained using a goat-anti-PHA-L antibody followed by a donkey–anti-goat Alexa Fluor^® 633 conjugated IgG; an Alexa Fluor^® 546-conjugated streptavidin (for BDA detection); and a non-commercial rabbit anti-rabies antibody followed by an Alexa Fluor^® 488-conjugated donkey–anti-rabbit IgG (Fig. 7). Details can be found in López et al. (2010).

Example E: detection of GPCR heteromers within identified projection neurons

GPCR heteromeric complexes are made of two different individual GPCRs. A GPCR complex represents a molecular entity with binding and signaling characteristics different from those of each individual (monomeric) GPCR. The recent arrival of the in situ proximity ligation assay technique (PLA; Söderberg et al. 2008) made it possible for the very first time to attempt the morphological identification of the localization of GPCR heteromers with hitherto unprecedented precision. Here, we combined PLA-based GPCR heteromer detection together with retrograde tracing with BDA. Striatal medium-sized spiny neurons in non-human primates were retrogradely labeled with BDA after tracer delivery into the internal division of the globus pallidus. Briefly, the PLA protocol was carried out first and GPCR heteromers were identified as red fluorescent spots (each one made up of combination of two different individual GPCRs). Once the PLA protocol was completed, the BDA protocol was conducted by taking full advantage of an Alexa Fluor^® 488-conjugated streptavidin (Fig. 8). Details can be found in Rico et al. (2017)

Biotin derivatives and carbocyanine dyes

Biocytin and neurobiotin

A low-molecular weight complex of biotin conjugated to lysine named ‘biocytin’ was introduced in intracellular neurophysiological recording by Horikawa and Armstrong (1988). After finishing a recording, the biocytin was ejected from the recording pipette into the neuron with the purpose to fill the cell completely. Because this type of study investigates both functional aspects and morphology, it is safe to speak of a two-dimensional approach. Intracellular neurophysiology followed by intracellular filling with dye has a history that goes back to the initial experiments by Stretton and Kravitz (1968). King et al. (1989) reported that biocytin, after extracellular injection, appears to be taken up by small pools of neurons in the direct vicinity of the pipette tip and becomes transported mostly anterogradely. These authors reported that in cases of large mechanical injections, some injection track labeling occurred as well as retrograde transport. Biocytin can, thus, be used label to fiber projections; it has been applied for this purpose in fish species (e.g., Northcutt and Westhoff 2011).

N-(2-aminoethyl)biotinamide, a biotin derivative marketed by Vector (Burlingame, CA) under the brand ‘Neurobiotin’, was introduced by Kita and Armstrong (1991) as an alternative to biocytin to fill neurons with a neutral marker dye after intracellular neurophysiological recording. Neurobiotin, just like biotin and biocytin, reacts irreversibly with streptavidin and, therefore, can easily be stained with any of a color chart of fluorochrome-conjugated streptavidins. Neurobiotin has been applied mostly as an intracellularly applied marker in mammals (rat, rabbit; as exemplified recently by Ruigrok et al. 2011), amphibians (Zhang et al. 2006), and invertebrates (Fan et al. 2005). In our own research, we have used neurobiotin as a tool in a two-dimensional approach to label small populations of neurons (Fig. 3d) (Wouterlood et al. 2004). The procedure and equipment for injection of neurobiotin is similar to that for PHA-L and BDA. A special application of neurobiotin has been neuroanatomical tracing in slices of post-mortem human brain (Dai et al. 1998a, Dai et al. 1998b).

The characteristics of neurobiotin and biocytin have been extensively reviewed by Lapper and Bolam (1991) and by Smith (1992). These authors confirmed King et al.’s (1989) observation that both compounds show a tendency of being transported retrogradely. Survival times after biocytin or neurobiotin injections need to be relatively short (1–4 days), because the compounds are quickly metabolized. Both compounds are best when being used for intracellular injection and for short-distance anterograde/retrograde tracing. Another application for biocytin and neurobiotin is juxtacellular injection that results in the complete labeling of single or very small groups of neurons, including their axons (Pinault 1996). Neurobiotin or biocytin application can be made multi-dimensional by combination with electrophysiological recording (Taverna et al. 2004) and chemical phenotyping (Toney and Daws 2006). Li et al. (1990) reported successful application of biocytin as an intracellular-injection marker in neurons in slices of fixed brain. Delivering the colorless biocytin to cells in slices of lightly fixed brain can be quite challenging. Li et al. (1990) used for this purpose micropipettes loaded with biocytin mixed with the fluorescent dye, Lucifer yellow. Liu et al. (1993) introduced a colored derivative of biocytin named ‘biotin-dextran miniruby’. One spectacular study using biocytin, neurobiotin, and BDA is that exploring the trigeminal innervation of the Schnauzenorgan of the elephant nose-fish, Gnathonemus petersii (Amey-Özel et al. 2015).

Carbocyanine dyes

Application of one of the extremely lipophilic carbocyanine dyes, DiA, DiI, or DiO, results in uptake and diffusion exclusively in lipid compartments, e.g., myelin sheaths (Godement et al. 1987; Honig and Hume 1986; Mufson et al. 1990, review by Honig 1993). Other high-affinity lipophilic dyes, e.g., several ‘color’ NeuroView^® dyes, have been added to the repertoire (Fritzsch et al. 2005; Jensen-Smith et al. 2007). These dyes are, therefore, suitable to label myelinated fiber tracts. As active transport is not involved, the spread of the staining is bidirectional. This diffusion type of ‘tracing’ is well positioned to be used in fixed tissue, e.g., embryonic (Catalano et al. 1996; Makarenko 2007), brain of newborn mammals (cat; Gabriele et al. 2006), or in fixed, post-mortem human brain (Mufson et al. 1990; Molnar et al. 2006; Heilingoetter and Jensen (2016). Diffusion implies that the time required to label sufficient lengths of axon, is considerable. In living organisms, DiA and DiI are being used for instance in fish to track myelinated fiber projections (D’aniello et al. 2015). Axon tracing procedures in ex vivo brain material, mostly with lipophilic dyes but also including several intracellular dye injection procedures, are extensively reviewed by Heilingoetter and Jensen (2016).

Tritiated amino acids and radioautography

A technique not much practiced any more today, yet worth mentioning, is the labeling of proteins in neurons through injections of radioactive amino acids into CNS loci. The neurons in the injection spot internalize the amino acids to incorporate them into oligopeptides and proteins which, in turn, are transported along the projection fibers towards the axon terminals. During the transport, decaying isotopes emit alpha particles that can be detected with a radioautographic detection procedure. This method was pioneered as a tracing method by Grafstein (1967) and fully developed as a tracer in the CNS by Cowan et al. (1972). Because this is a true transport-based method and because anterograde transport is exploited, the impact on neuroscience of this method has been considerable. Cowan and Cuénod (1975) and Swanson (1981) provide extensive coverage of this type of neuroanatomical tracing.

Particles: large and small

Larry Katz ET AL. reported in 1984 that rhodamine tagged latex microspheres (diameter 20–200 nm) are internalized at axon terminals and retrogradely transported to the neuronal cell body (Katz et al. 1984). Katz’ beads can be categorized as ‘microparticles’, to distinguish them from smaller ‘nanoparticles’ (mostly metallic gold; diameter < 20 nm). Later, Katz expanded his latex bead family with green fluorescing microparticles (Katz and Iarovici 1990) to enable double-label tracing. These beads were used in connectivity studies of feline visual cortex (e.g., Katz 1987). Discrete particles offer in neuroanatomical tracing a particular advantage over macromolecules, because they make it possible without much complex chemistry to carry the study of neuronal connectivity from the light microscope level over into the electron microscope realm (Egensperger and Holländer 1988). Microparticles diffuse marginally at the site of injection; they are chemically inert and they persist for long. Katz et al. (1984) reported that microparticles have to fulfill certain physical and chemical conditions to be sufficiently attractive to neurons to become internalized. The same seems to be true for nanoparticles (Jung et al. 2006; Mendoza et al. 2010). In spite of its attractiveness, particle-based tracing never went viral: today, this type of tracing occupies its own modest niche in the universe of neuroanatomical tracing (e.g., Shafton and McAllen, 2013; Appeltants et al. 2000 and similarly, Wang et al. 2013 with 30–40 nm-diameter red fluorescent carboxylate-modified latex microspheres). Gold nanoparticles (10–12 nm) coated with lectin (Basbaum and Menetrey, 1987; Ruigrok et al. 1995; for detailed preparation of gold-lectin nanoparticles, see Ruigrok and Apps 2007) are taken up by axon terminals and retrogradely transported to the cell body where they can be made visible for light microscopic viewing through a silver enhancement step. Compatibility of lectin-coated nanogold particle tracing exists with the other neuroanatomical tracing methods (Basbaum and Menetrey 1987; Ruigrok and Apps 2007) and also with non-tracing histochemical procedures, e.g., in situ hybridization (Jongen-Rêlo and Amaral 2000). A quite recent development is to conduct retrograde fluorescent latex microparticle tracing and follow-up with intracellular injection of Lucifer Yellow (Vercelli et al. 2000) or diolistic labeling with DiI of target neurons whose cell bodies contain transported microparticles (Neely et al. 2009).

In the peripheral nervous system, Cholera toxin B conjugated carbon dots have been used to retrogradely trace connectivity (Zhou et al. 2015).

A different application of nanoparticles is to use them as non-cytotoxic vehicles to deliver viral vectors into neurons (Bharali et al. 2005; 30 nm size silica particles). The nanoparticles serve two roles here: carrying the tracing flag while at the same time delivering a payload such as a drug or a photosensitive dye for photodynamic cancer treatment (Roy et al. 2003).

In fact, the Bharali et al. (2005) experiment bridges the gap between inorganic nanoparticle tracing and tracing with ‘natural’ nanoparticles, i.e., viruses (dimensions measured in angstroms and molecular mass determined in daltons). As the increasingly ‘popular’ adenovirus capsid measures approximately 90 nm across (900 Å; Harrison 2010) this agent can be considered as a small, hollow organic microparticle that can be tweaked to carry a payload. Contrary to an inorganic particle that must be coated with an appealing agent to make it sufficiently attractive for a neuron to ingest it, a virus is much more effective. It possesses the receptor complements to attach to neurons of choice and inject them with DNA or RNA fragments to force their molecular machinery to start producing an endless stream of duplicates of the virus or a particular metabolic product. We will return to this issue later in this review.

Non-fluorescent and fluorescent retrograde tracing

Good old horseradish peroxidase

The ‘archmother’ of the neuroanatomical transport tracers is without doubt the enzyme, horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The first studies on retrograde transport of HRP were one-dimensional (Kristensson and Olsson (1971a,b), wherein these researchers reported that they had observed labeling of spinal motoneurons in rats after deposition of HRP in the gastrocnemius muscle. Detection was done colorimetrically with diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate (Graham and Karnovsky 1965). In another report in 1971, Kristensson and Olsson (1971a) described in rats labeling of motoneurons in the hypoglossal nucleus following injection of HRP into the tongue. The first report of tracing central connectivity in brain followed in the next year (LaVail and LaVail 1972). Today, HRP is considered to be a bidirectional tracer with asymmetry in transport direction (i.e., overwhelmingly retrograde). The most common types of HRP used for tracing are Sigma Type VI (Sigma-Aldrich/Merck, St. Louis, MO) and Boehringer (Boehringer–Ingelheim). The enzyme is applied in solution by mechanical injection, or applied as a foam gel, crystals or pellets, and it is subsequently internalized by fluid-phase endocytosis into membrane clad endosomes. In the interior of the neuron, the HRP remains endosome packaged. The endosomes are transported towards the perikaryon where they fuse with lysosomes to undergo degradation by endogenous peroxidase.

A long list can be made up in the literature of connectivity studies using HRP as the tracer of choice; HRP is still being used (Afarinesh and Behzadi, 2017). In the course of only one decade following the publications by Kristensson and Olsson, the HRP tracing technique matured; most of what is necessary to conduct successful HRP tracing can be found in reference works such as the books by Mesulam (1982) and Bolam (1992). A protocol type of discussion of HRP tracing, including all the chromogens available for light and electron microscopy, is provided by Mesulam and Rosene (1979) and, more recently, by van der Want et al. (1997). In standard HRP tracing, the contrast between the formed precipitate versus background can be enhanced by the addition of nickel–ammonium sulfate to the incubation medium (Ni enhancement; Hancock 1986).

Fluorescent retrograde tracers

While tracing with HRP requires delicate histochemical processing, a faster, more ‘no non-sense’ way of visualizing neuronal connectivity would be via the uptake and transport of a tracer that fluoresces by itself. This simple idea had been addressed by Kristensson 1 year before his landmark introduction of HRP. Thus, in 1970, Kristensson reported on an experiment in which he had injected a conjugate of albumin and the fluorescent dye, Evans Blue into the gastrocnemius muscle of rats. After a post-surgical survival period, fluorescence signal was detected in spinal motoneurons (Kristensson 1970). Maybe the idea was put in a lab drawer by the gigantic success of the HRP story 1 year later, because it took nearly a decade before Kristensson’s idea was repeated, this time with inorganic fluorescent dyes injected into the CNS (Bentivoglio et al. 1979; Kuypers et al. 1979). Similarly to HRP, the inorganic fluorescent dyes appear to be taken up by nerve terminals and transported retrogradely to their parent cell bodies. A repertoire of retrogradely transported fluorescent dyes has since been introduced: bisbenzimide, DAPI primuline, propidium iodide (Kuypers et al. 1979), True Blue, granular blue (Bentivoglio et al. 1979), nuclear yellow, Fast Blue (Kuypers et al. 1980; Bentivoglio et al. 1980), and diamidino yellow (Keizer et al. 1983). Of these, Fast Blue and diamidino yellow are still being applied frequently. Depending on their composition, retrogradely fluorescent dyes may accumulate in the perikaryal cytoplasm, bind to nuclear components such as nucleic acids, or may accumulate in specific cell organelles. For instance, Fast Blue accumulates in the cytoplasmic compartment, whereas diamidino yellow lights up nuclei. While the early fluorescent tracers suffered from photobleaching under UV illumination, a newer generation of retrograde fluorescent tracers such as Fluoro-Gold (FG; hydroxystilbamidine; accumulates in the cytoplasmic compartment) (Schmued and Fallon 1986) and Fluoro-Ruby (rhodamine-dextran-amine; Schmued et al. 1990) appears very robust as well as extremely photobleaching resistant. In a living animal, FG may resist metabolic breakdown up to a year post-injection. Its intense and bleach-resistant labeling has contributed to raising FG to the level of ‘gold standard’ for fluorescent retrograde labeling in rodents, particularly for multiple labeling in combination with other tracers (Fig. 5, schematically) (see Abdel-Majid et al. 2005; Wouterlood et al. 2018b). Fast Blue is being phased out after the initial manufacturer (Dr. Ihling, Germany) ceased production; currently, this compound is back in the catalog of the Sigma-Aldrich company. Nevertheless, Fast Blue in combination with diamidino yellow still is being used in double-retrograde fluorescent labeling studies.

While FG is known as a retrograde tracer per se, Fluoro-Ruby is also transported anterogradely (Bowyer and Schmued 2006), as it is chemically related to BDA.

Fluorescent tracers (retrograde as well as anterograde) offer several characteristics that are very useful for neuroanatomical connectivity research. First, the label is directly visible in a fluorescence microscope without any histochemical or immunohistochemical treatment. Second, many of these tracers (e.g., FG) can be used to trace extremely long fiber tracts, e.g., corticospinal and bulbospinal projections (e.g. Rice et al. 2010). Special characteristics of FG are that it survives rigorous immunofluorescence procedures and that it can be used to mark neuronal cell bodies as targets for intracellular injection post fixation (Abdel-Majid et al. 2005; Wouterlood et al. 2018b). Finally, because of their spectral characteristics, fluorescent retrograde markers serve as near-ideal tracers to study axon collateralization in double-labeling experiments and, in a multi-dimensional setting in combination with immunofluorescence, to study the neurochemical identity of traced fiber projections (an approach pioneered by Van der Kooy and Steinbusch 1980; reviewed by Huisman et al. 1984 and by Wessendorf 1990). Successful application of quadruple retrograde fluorescence tracing to follow medium and long tracts in the CNS of rats was conducted by Akintunde and Buxton (1992), whereas Richmond et al. (1994) systematically compared results with seven different retrograde tracers in a cat peripheral motor nerve model: Fast Blue, FG, fluorescein-dextran, rhodamine-dextran-amine (RDA), fluorescent latex microspheres, HRP, and DiI. Schofield et al. (2007) reported different results with mixtures of two retrograde fluorescent tracers injected into one spot in the CNS. An interesting observation is that retrogradely labeled ganglion cells in rat retina may pass FG via gap junctions to amacrine cells (Abdel-Majid et al. 2005).

Application of all these tracers is mostly via mechanical injection with a Hamilton syringe or glass micropipette. A few studies report microiontophoretical delivery (e.g., Schmued and Heimer 1990). Most fluorescent tracers can be dissolved in water. Diamidino yellow is difficult to dissolve and is typically suspended at 2–3% in 200-mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 (Keizer et al. 1983) and sonicated just before use. Diamidino yellow produces smaller injection sites than Fast Blue and FG, which may be an advantage depending on the system that is being investigated. Transport times for long distance fiber connections in primates which range between 1 and 5 weeks, depending on the distance involved (e.g., 5 weeks for strong labeling of corticospinal and corticobulbar neurons in macaque monkeys after injection of diamidino yellow into the cervical spinal cord and injection of Fast Blue into the lower medulla; Keizer and Kuypers, 1989). After the required post-surgery transport period, brains are commonly fixed via perfusion–fixation with phosphate-buffered 4% depolymerized paraformaldehyde. A trace of glutaraldehyde (0.05%) is allowed to improve fixation, although glutaraldehyde strongly contributes to ‘green’ fluorescence background signal. After fixation, the tissue can be cut immediately on a vibrating microtome, or cryoprotected, frozen, and then cut at 40–60-µm thickness on a freezing microtome.

Fluoro-Gold: application notes and source

FG can be considered as today’s flagship of the retrograde fluorescence tracer repertoire (Schmued 2016), especially in multi-dimensional tracing procedures in which the second and/or third layers are immunofluorescence procedures. One disadvantage of FG in the latter type of studies is that its emission spectrum is quite wide. FG-related emission thus may cross bleed into the channel reserved for the second or even third fluorescent label. In confocal laser scanning studies, FG is less favored because of this, but also because its excitation peak sits at 323 nm (Schmued and Fallon, 1986) which requires an extra (expensive) laser. This disadvantage can be circumvented by not relying on FG itself but instead on an anti-FG antibody (Chang et al. 1990). Antibodies against FG have been successfully used as well to carry over light microscopical tracing to the electron microscope (Deller et al. 2000).

FG is marketed by Fluorochrome, Inc. (Denver, CO), and it is applied through mechanical injection or iontophoresis. It can be dissolved in a range of buffers (e.g., 5-mM acetate buffer, pH 5.0, 100-mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) of which 100-mM cacodylate buffer pH 7.3 seems favorite for either a mechanical application via a Hamilton syringe or via microiontophoresis (Schmued and Heimer, 1990). Survival periods range from 1 week to 1 year.

An impressive track record: the CTB family

A great step forward in the evolution of HRP tracing was conjugation of native HRP with the (non-toxic) B subunit of cholera toxin (CTB-HRP) or with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA-HRP) (Trojanowski et al. (1981). Tracing with these conjugates 60-fold improved the sensitivity of the tracing method compared with native HRP, while an anterograde transport component of the tracer became evident. The strongly enhanced sensitivity hinges on three features. First, the uptake of CTB-HRP or WGA-HRP by neurons occurs via a receptor-mediated uptake mechanism called adsorptive endocytosis, while native HRP is taken up by less-efficient fluid-phase endocytosis (reviewed by Trojanowski 1983). Second, detection of transported CTB-HRP and WGA-HRP requires immunohistochemistry which is much more sensitive than the ‘plain’ colorimetric histochemistry used in the classical HRP procedure. Third, the immunohistochemical reaction itself was markedly improved by the introduction of a new chromogen: tetramethylbenzidine instead of diaminobenzidine (see Mesulam 1982).

CTB-HRP has been reported to become less rapidly eliminated from retrogradely labeled neurons than native HRP (Wan et al. 1982), probably because the CTB-HRP is transported along a different intracellular pathway than native HRP (Trojanowski, 1983). Thus, both CTB-HRP and WGA-HRP can be regarded as bidirectional tracers. Anterograde axonal transport occurs at a fast rate (e.g., about 108 mm/day for WGA-HRP); native HRP is anterogradely transported slower, at a rate of 288–432 mm/day (Trojanowski 1983).

Lindh et al. (1989) and Luppi et al. (1990) were the first to go one step beyond Trojanowski et al. by conducting tracing with CTB in its unconjugated (‘plain’) form. A big advantage compared with HRP and CTB-HRP is that ‘plain’ CTB is exclusively transported retrogradely. Another advantage of ‘plain’ CTB is that its detection does not interfere with intrinsic peroxidase activity present in peroxisomes and lysosomes. One of the big concerns in classical HRP tracing was rapid development of background staining during the histochemistry (Mesulam 1982). Such background staining is in principle absent when ‘plain’ CTB is used in combination with immunohistochemical detection. ‘Plain’ CTB, followed up by immunofluorescence detection, is, therefore, the (non-fluorescent) retrograde tracer of choice today. Direct CTB tracing with rhodamine- or fluorescein-conjugated CTBs has been performed by Lyckman et al. (2005) in the visual system of mice. A series of robust, photostable Alexa Fluor^® conjugated CTB molecules is nowadays available (Conte et al. 2009a, b). Just like the inorganic retrograde fluorescent tracers, these compounds are directly visible in a fluorescence microscope. Because CTB is considered a retrograde tracer pur sang and also because it has proven its compatibility with other neuroanatomical tracing regimes, it is in double-immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence conditions often applied in multi-dimensional studies, e.g., in combination with the anterograde tracer PHA-L (Berendse et al. 1992b), BDA (Atoji et al. 2018; Arima et al. 2019), combined with standard immunofluorescence procedures to either visualize the chemocytoarchitectonics of the area (Berendse et al. 1992a) or to chemically phenotype the retrogradely labeled neurons (Gumbs et al. 2019) (schematic, Fig. 5b). CTB can be used in a double-retrograde tracing experiment with Fluoro-Gold; in one of such labeling experiments, the tracers were injected each on a different side of the midline in the superior colliculus in rats (Yao et al. 2018). Minor differences were reported in retrograde staining of neurons in the retina. Finally, double direct retrograde tracing using two different fluorescence-conjugated CTBs has been reported in the PNS (Maeda et al. 2017). The far majority of CTB tracing studies have been conducted in a variety of mammals, while reports on work in pigeon (e.g., Atoji and Wild 2004; Atoji et al. 2018) provide evidence that this tracer also can be applied in non-mammals.

Bacterial toxins other than CTB have been proposed but have never become so dominating the scene as CTB. For instance, the (non-toxic) C fragment of tetanus toxin (TTC) conjugated to Lac-Z (Coen et al. 1997) or to GFP (Maskos et al. 2002) as (transsynaptic) retrograde tracers have been reported.

The slow, unstoppable rise of viruses as tracing tools

The exploitation of viruses has an exciting history. Initially, viruses were introduced as nanoparticles whose presence and travel routes are traceable; today, they are increasingly used as delivery systems for genetic payloads that subsequently turn neurons into tracer–producing molecular machines. In human medicine, the fog of history shrouds the origin of the awareness that a mysterious agent, transmitted via kissing or sexual contact, causes blisters on the lips, in the oral region or genitals. Hippocrates and the emperors of Rome seemed to be aware of this phenomenon, and Shakespeare is said to have mentioned it in his ‘Romeo and Juliet’. In the 1920s, the vector of the disease was identified as Herpes simplex virus (HSV). Type-1 HSV-1 infects skin epithelial cells, multiplies, migrates to nerve endings and then travels along sensory nerves to settle in neuronal perikarya inside spinal and cranial nerve ganglia (Goodpasture and Teague 1923; Johnson 1964). The presence of HSV nanoparticles inside axons was confirmed in 1972 by electron microscopy (Hill et al. 1972).

First-generation vector: neurotropic viruses

These early observations prompted researchers in the 1970s to test the usefulness of HSV in tracing paradigms in the CNS and PNS (Kristensson et al. 1974, 1982; Bak et al. 1977). Ugolini et al. (Ugolini et al. 1987, 1989) recognized the ‘natural’ signal amplification by virtue of virus replicating itself, and they praised the unique potential of virus particles to cross synapses to infect second-in-line neurons (Fig. 9). The latter feature produces labeled neurons that in neuronal networks synaptically communicate with the infected neuron (Ugolini et al. 1989). Initial problems were the runaway nature of retrograde viral infections and the highly virulent appetite of native HSV-1 for humans which required rigorous laboratory biosafety containment measures. HSV-1 appears to be transported bidirectionally in an asymmetrical way, that is, strongest retrogradely (Ugolini 2010). A search for a virus propagates exclusively in the retrograde direction brought (canine) rabies virus (RV, Ugolini 1995) (review: Junyent and Kremer 2015) and swine rabies virus (PRV) (pseudorabies virus; Martin and Dolivo 1983; Loewy 1995; review: Callaway 2008) into the spotlight. Once receptor-mediated fusion of a rabies virus envelope with the axon terminal’s membrane has succeeded and the capsid has become internalized, this material becomes attached to rapid, dynein mediated fast (retrograde) axonal transport along microtubules. Once arrived in the cell’s perikaryon the viral DNA strands target the nucleus (Sodeik 2000; Pomeranz et al. 2005; Ugolini 2010). Today, attenuated rabies virus strains such as CVS-11 (Ugolini 1995) PRV (Jansen et al. 1995)/PRV–Bartha (Aston-Jones and Card 2000) and CVS-N2c^ΔG (Reardon et al. 2016; Zhu et al. 2019) provide reliable tools for retrograde tracing of neuronal connectivity with the added value of transsynaptic labeling. Recently a safe, neuron-friendly double-deletion RV vector was introduced (Chatterjee et al. 2018).

Apart from the above viral strains, ‘plain’ RV exhibits strong neurotropism and transsynaptic passage (reviewed in Kelly and Strick 2004), therefore, appointing this virus as an excellent tool for elucidating neuronal ensembles, such as those giving rise to cortico-striato-nigral and cortico-striato-pallidal pathways (Fig. 9) (Deng et al. 2015). RV is an RNA virus that exhibits a higher efficiency for retrograde transport than HSV together with a lower cytopathogenicity (Ugolini 1995). Although RV can be detected with antibodies recognizing a viral nucleoprotein, thus resulting in labeling of neuronal soma and main thickest dendrites, the thinnest dendritic processes and dendritic spines cannot be detected through this approach. This limitation has been circumvented by performing viral detection with antibodies directed against a soluble viral phosphoprotein (31G10; isolated by Raux et al. 1997) that spreads throughout the cytoplasm of RV-infected neurons. The result is Golgi-silver staining-like retrograde labeling of these neurons (see Fig. 7) (Salin et al. 2008, 2009; López et al. 2010).

Recombinant viruses that transfect cells to produce a fluorescent marker

At the end of the twentieth century, the synergy between molecular biology and virology reached the point that viral vectors could be seemingly at will constructed in virology labs around the world. A remarkable, novel feature of virus application was touched at the end of the previous section: the ability to switch on gene expression in infected cells. This feature is increasingly being exploited by virus-based tracing.

One of the first reports using a recombinant virus primarily to act as a delivery agent to transfect neurons in the CNS with a gene that codes for GFP was by Chamberlin et al. (1998) who used an adeno-associated virus (AAV). Here, an anterograde tracing paradigm was established, because in the transfected neurons, fluorescent protein accumulates everywhere, most importantly in the axon down to the axon terminals. In the same time frame, the unraveling of the molecular structure of viruses (PRV: Pomeranz et al. 2005; AV: Fuschiotti et al. 2006; Harrison 2010) made it possible to proceed even further. An explosion followed of combinations of preferred features taken from different, useful viruses and assembled into new, unique and highly specific vectors. The insertion of a gene coding for lacZ or GFP in a PRV-Bartha strain made multiple-synapse retrograde tracing more efficient (Boldogköi et al. 2002). This PRV-152 ‘conjugate’ was subsequently successfully applied as transsynaptic tracer in the rat ortho- and parasympathetic systems (Szabó et al. 2015; Ahn et al. 2018). A similar GFP Cre-dependent PRV vector approach has been used to trace connectivity in the basal ganglia (Ribeiro et al. 2019). Runaway second-order and higher order virus infection, however, remains a danger. As glycoprotein G appears to be a key ingredient in multisynaptic retrograde transfer of virus (Mazarakis et al. 2001), a rabies virus deficient for glycoprotein G (Mebatsion and Gonzelmann 1996; reviewed in Callaway, 2008) was proposed as a tool for the first-order-neuron-only retrograde tracing tool (as illustrated in Fig. 7); the subsequent substitution in Wickersham’s lab of the gene coding for glycoprotein G by one coding for EGFP produced a powerful, first-in-line-neuron-only retrogradely transported vector that, by virtue of expressing EGFP in infected cells, made retrogradely labeled, infected neurons directly visible under fluorescence (SADΔG-EGFP; Wickersham et al. 2007a; Kim et al. 2016). High specificity combined with a low biosafety hazard level has been obtained with a G protein-deleted PRV strain SAD B19 with a GFP cassette included in their genome. These viruses lack glycoprotein necessary for infection; virus infection is started by means of a second injection of a ‘helper’ virus that switches on GFP expression by the infected neurons (review in Ghanem and Conzelmann, 2016). Some classes of neuron seem to resist SADΔG-eGFP and similar fluorescence transfecting vectors (Albisetti et al. 2017). The synaptic specificity in transsynaptic virus tracing is not yet completely understood and needs to be further investigated (Beier, 2019).

While most attention focused on canine and swine rabies virus, ‘good old’ HSV-1, i.e., the strain H129 ΔTk-TT, received renewed attention as a tool to trace transsynaptically in an anterograde fashion, while carrying a Cre-dependent loxP-STOP-loxP-tdTomato-2A-TK cassette (Lo and Anderson, 2011), making this tool only usable in transgenic mice.

Up to this stage, most publications on virus tracing represent the ‘first generation’ of application; viruses used primarily as a one-dimensional tracing tool with the purpose to chart the retrograde spread of infection along pathways and synaptic junctions into second and third order of neurons in the PNS and CNS. Also, most work was done in rats and mice; to have a more universal retrograde transsynaptic virus tracing instrument at hand, Beier et al. (2017) tested recombinant tracing with vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) in a range of animal species, e.g., chicken and zebrafish. Recently, Li et al. reported an attempt to improve retrograde neurotropic virus tracing that included a canine adenovirus 2 (CAV-2) vector constructed to force neurons to express adenovirus receptors on their outer membranes (Li et al. 2018).

Sidestep into the world of adenoviruses

A short diversion into adenoviruses (AV) seems appropriate here. Adenoviruses are medium-sized (90–100 nm), icosahedral entities composed of a nucleocapsid and a double-stranded linear DNA genome (Harrison, 2010). Upon infection, only the viral DNA enters the host cell and is immediately transcribed. Because this DNA is not incorporated into the host’s genes, it is not replicated when cell division occurs, and for that matter, the virus DNA does not occur in descendants of the infected host cells. The used adenoviruses are non-toxic and do not offer a biohazard to humans. These characteristics render AV and adeno-associated viruses (AAV) perfect candidates to engineer into instruments to functionally interrogate neural circuits (review by Sun and Schaffer, 2018), for instance to introduce a ‘light switch flipping gene’ into a neuron.

Viruses flipping the light switch in specific neurons

At this point, the term ‘vector’ should be precisely defined. Nassi et al. (2015) provide such a definition: a derivative of a virus used for the delivery of genes. As gene transfer into host neurons is necessary to promote replication of virus particles, e.g., in a simple tracing paradigm or in attempts to flip gene expression on, deliver genetic payload or to completely overhaul the host’s metabolism, we will further use in this review the term ‘viral vector’. Besides providing an operational definition of ‘vector’, Nassi et al. (2015) document all current viruses of interest to neuroscientists (Table 2 in Nassi et al. 2015).

Here, the onset of a new generation, i.e., virus-vector tracing, can be distinguished, in which the emphasis of the application is not so much tracing connectivity as well as the delivery of a payload targeting the host neuron’s genome. This payload may be a gene or a drug. One important further step in the evolution of the virus-vector tracing techniques was to increase the specificity of the tracing system. For this purpose, several solutions have been devised. We identify a few here.

Microcircuit tracing with genetically altered rabies virus in Cre mice

Microcircuits are neuronal ensembles consisting in their most simple form of a ‘main neuron’ surrounded by interneurons impinging on it through synaptic contacts. The projection neurons in nuclei’A’ and ‘B’ in Fig. 1 can be considered as ‘main neurons’ in microcircuitry terminology. Standard neuroanatomical tracing methods are poorly equipped to study microcircuits, because the brain volume occupied by a microcircuit is in the same order of magnitude as an injection spot produced with a classical neuroanatomical tracer (Fig. 2a). With anterograde tracers, microcircuits usually remain obscured by the entanglement of labeled perikarya, dendrites, and fibers in the injection spot. Application of a retrograde tracer does not help, because these tracers only label the projection neurons (Fig. 2b). Up to now, basically two instruments were available to study microcircuits: intracellular neurophysiology (e.g., Sik et al. 1993; Klausberger and Somogyi 2008) and Golgi-silver impregnation (e.g., Bolam and Ingham 1990).

In 1998, Chamberlin et al. pioneered on a novel, third instrument: genetically engineered viruses. Creative engineering with rabies virus that followed plus the availability of genetically engineered mice has perfected this third instrument: tracing with pseudotyped G-deleted rabies virus in Cre-dependent TVA mice, as introduced by Wickersham et al. (Wickersham et al. 2007b; Callaway and Luo 2015) (Fig. 10a), expanded by Osakada et al. (2011), and beautifully conducted by Oyibo et al. (2014), Sun et al. (2014), and Zingg et al. 2018. Here, two injections of vectors into the brain are necessary: the first one is with a non-replicating AAV LoxP-Lox2272 helper virus which activates the expression of GFP and B19-glycoprotein through Cre. This injection creates a spot containing GFP ‘starter’ neurons (the ‘main neurons’ in microcircuits) that are rabies infection prone, because they express B19-glycoprotein on their outer cellular membranes. The second injection (in the same location) is the actual tracing step with pseudotyped G-deleted, mCherry rabies virus. Only B-19 expressing neurons (which by virtue contain also GFP) internalize the rabies vector and transfer the rabies vector via synapses to the second-in-line neurons that provide afferents to the B19-GFP neurons. The rabies vector infected cells accumulate mCherry and under appropriate fluorescence excitation will light up red, while the GFP expressing ‘main’ neurons will light up green (schematically: Fig. 10b) (explained in Callaway and Luo 2015). Sun et al. (2014) and Hafner et al. (2019) beautifully illustrate microcircuit visualization in cerebral cortex. Also at the thalamic–hypothalamic level, this approach works (Broms et al. 2017).

Flipping light switches: AAV and neurotransmitter-specific tracing

Classical tracing methods can be regarded as poor instruments to study connectivity of neurotransmitter-specific neurons, because inorganic tracers, lectin tracers, and ‘classical’ virus tracers in essence act non-selective. They simply go at work with all the neurons available in an injection spot. In cerebral cortex for example, deposition loci of PHA-L or BDA are usually full of labeled neurons of all sorts of pyramidal cells (that are known to be excitatory) and stellate-type neurons (most of which belong to some class of inhibitory interneuron). A consequence of this apparent lack of specificity is that one can expect in ‘chemical fingerprinting’ studies rather disappointingly low numbers of tracer-labeled axon terminals that express the second, sought-after marker (as we experienced; Wouterlood et al. 2018a). In this respect, a ‘chemical fingerprinting’ study resembles interrogating the entire population of a town to find one lone burglar. The same can be said of retrograde tracing combined with neurotransmitter immunohistochemistry with the purpose to study neurotransmitter-specific projections. Efficiency would jump to a higher order of magnitude if only cells expressing a particular neurotransmitter would become labeled, e.g., GABAergic neurons, cholinergic neurons, monoaminergic neurons, and the like. Genetic engineering and virus-vector delivery has made this possible.

Around the arrival of the twenty-first century, the first reports were published of work with strains of genetically modified mice in which specific subsets of CNS neurons express green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Sauer 1998; Callahan et al. 1998): for instance GFP expressing olfactory bulb granule cells (van den Pol and Ghosh 1998) and thy1 gene expressing neurons (Feng et al. 2000; Porrero et al. 2010). Next came neurotransmitter-specific transgenic mice with Cre-recombinase expression in dopaminergic neurons (Zhao et al. 2004; Bäckman et al. 2006; Witten et al. 2011—in rats), GAD67 neurons (Tamamaki et al. 2003), 5HT (serotonergic) neurons (Zhuang et al. 2005), choline acetyltransferase (cholinergic) neurons (von Engelhardt et al. 2007), and parvalbumin (GABAergic) neurons (Tanahira et al. 2009). A whole series of transgenic mice is currently available wherein neurotransmitter-specific neurons express fluorescent proteins of various spectral variants (Taniguchi et al. 2011). In spite of this impressive progress, one drawback remained, notably that in these mice, all cells with the corresponding neurochemical identity express some fluorescent protein. The same happens in the multispectral brainbow mice (Weissman et al. 2011). To trace axonal connectivity effectively preferably, a small portion of the neurotransmitter-specific neurons in these transgenic mice should start expressing fluorescent protein. The key vector to achieve this is an adenovirus- or adeno-associated virus vector whose primary role is not so much to trace neuronal connectivity, but, instead, to deliver a gene coding for one of the fluorescent proteins. Expression of channelrhodopsin-mCherry can be forced in Cre-recombinase mice through focal injection with a viral vector (e.g., rAAV–FLEX–rev-ChR2mCherry; Atasoy et al. 2008). Channelrhodopsin expression is mainly used in photostimulation studies. Although this fluorescent protein is applicable in tracing studies concentrations in long axons remain low with, accordingly, weak staining (Atasoy et al. 2008). For anatomical purposes, GFP and eYFP have much better properties than channelrhodopsin, because these fluorescent proteins accumulate in axons to levels sufficiently high to render fibers with all their details visible in routine and confocal fluorescence microscopy.

Kuhlman and Huang (2008) experimented in this respect with AAV in Cre-recombinase knock-in parvalbumin (PV) transgenic mice. The AAV harbored a loxP–STOP–loxP cassette in between a promoter and a DNA sequence coding for a fluorescent protein, in this experiment eYFP. The trick here is that the Cre-recombinase gene occurs in the cell’s genome immediately after the gene coding for PV. As a consequence, Cre recombinase is only expressed in neurons that express also PV and only in these specific cells recombines the payload delivered by the adeno-associated virus. After AAV injection, PV neurons in the injection site promptly started to express and accumulate eYFP (Kuhlman and Huang 2008). Harris et al. (2012) further explored this idea, whereas Bloem et al. (2014) similarly used a series of topographically organized injections of an AAV-2 vector carrying the double-floxed gene, EF1α–DIO–EYFP–WPRE–pA, to map cortical projections from small subpopulations of cholinergic neurons in the forebrain cholinergic system of Cre-recombinase knock-in choline acetylcholinesterase transgenic mice (Fig. 12). Because the vector forces transfected cholinergic neurons to express eYFP (Sohal et al.; 2009; see also Madisen et al. 2010), the tracing can be considered as passive by accumulation of eYFP in all processes belonging to transfected neurons (Fig. 11c). This technique truly compares with flipping a light switch in only a few chemophenotypically specific neurons, resembling the illumination of a few individuals of a tree population in an otherwise completely dark forest (Fig. 12).

It is without doubt that AAVs collectively represent invaluable tools for a wide range of CNS applications; these include key aspects like circuit tracing, modeling neurodegenerative proteinopathies, as well as a number of therapeutic approaches under the current development (reviewed in Pignataro et al. 2018). Although different AAV serotypes exhibit some degree of retrograde transport, a number of capsid modifications have recently been designed in an attempt to boost retrograde transduction. In this regard, capsid variants such as AAV2-retro (Tervo et al. 2016), AAV-TT (Tordo et al. 2018) and AAV2-HBKO (Naidoo et al. 2018) hold great promise, allowing widespread CNS transgene expression by taking advantage of brain circuits innervating the area of deposit. Accordingly, intraparenchymal delivery of the above viral vectors resulted in retrograde spread of the transgene throughout a number of brain areas innervating the injected site. Although AAV2-HBKO has been successfully tested in non-human primates after intraparenchymal injection in the thalamus (Naidoo et al. 2018), it is also worth noting that the performance of AAV2-retro and AAV-TT capsid variants so far has only been tested in the CNS of rodents, both “retroAAVs” being injected into either the striatum (AAV2-reto and AAV-TT) or in pontine nuclei (AAV2-retro). These two brain areas host neurons but also fibers of passage coursing downstream towards their terminal endings. Uptake of the injected “retroAAVs” through fibers of passage can, therefore, not be ruled out. Overall, although the rationale for “multiple CNS areas being transduced with just one injection” looks extremely appealing, results with AAV2-retro and AAV-TT remain to be validated in non-human primates by injecting these AAV capsid variants in brain territories lacking fibers of passage.

Final notes

Multi-dimensional approaches in neuroanatomy have in the past 40 years replaced the pioneering, one-dimensional techniques. After a fledgling start in the 1970s, the future seems very bright for tracing studies with viruses that bring or trigger fluorescent protein expression in first- and second-in-line neurons. Viruses offer a spectacular third instrument in research aimed at elucidating the organization of microcircuits.

It should be noted, though, that viruses are specialized agents that have evolved to target specific animal species. Most, if not all, axon tracing work with viruses has been conducted with a limited range of mammalian species. In spite of this limitation viruses remain currently in the spotlight because of their incredible potential as molecular-genetic tools, not only in neuroscience (Luo et al. 2018), but everywhere in biomedical applications. One, ironic example is the approach to fight Herpes virus infections with gene therapy brought about by virus vectors (Chen et al. 2018). In human medicine, first successes have been reported using viruses in gene therapy models. Viruses may also be applied as vehicle to carry therapeutic agents to diseased neurons in neurodegenerative diseases (Géral et al. 2013) or assist in brain repair (Chen et al. 2019).

References

Aarnisalo AA, Panula P (1995) Neuropeptide FF-containing efferent projections from the medial hypothalamus of rat: a Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin study. Neuroscience 65:175–192
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Abdel-Majid RM, Archibald ML, Tremblay F, Baldridge WH (2005) Tracer coupling of neurons in the rat retina inner nuclear layer labeled by Fluorogold. Brain Res 1063:114–120
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Afarinesh MR, Behzadi G (2017) The pattern of thalamocortical and brain stem projections to the vibrissae-related sensory and motor cortices in de-whiskered congenital hypothyroid rats. Metab Brain Dis 32:1223–1235
PubMed Google Scholar
Ahn J, Saltos TM, Tom VJ, Hou S (2018) Transsynaptic tracing to dissect supraspinal serotonergic input regulating the bladder reflex in rats. Neurourol Urodyn 37:2487–2494
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Akintunde A, Buxton DF (1992) Origins and collateralization of corticospinal, corticopontine, corticorubral and corticostriatal tracts: a multiple retrograde fluorescent tracing study. Brain Res 586:208–218
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Albisetti GW, Ghanem A, Foster E, Conzelmann KK, Zeilhofer HU, Wildner H (2017) Identification of two classes of somatosensory neurons that display resistance to retrograde infection by rabies virus. J Neurosci 37:10358–10371
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Amaral DG, Kondo H, Lavenex P (2014) An analysis of entorhinal cortex projections to the dentate gyrus, hippocampus, and subiculum of the neonatal macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol. 522:1485–1505
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Amey-Özel M, von der Emde G, Engelmann J, Grant K (2015) More a finger than a nose: the trigeminal motor and sensory innervation of the Schnauzenorgan in the elephant-nose fish Gnathonemus petersii. J Comp Neurol 523:769–789
PubMed Google Scholar
Antal M, Freund TF, Somogyi P, McIlhinney RA (1990) Simultaneous anterograde labelling of two afferent pathways to the same target area with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin and Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin conjugated to biotin or dinitrophenol. J Chem Neuroanat 3:1–9
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Appeltants D, Absil P, Balthazart J, Ball GF (2000) Identification of the origin of catecholaminergic inputs to HVc in canaries by retrograde tract tracing combined with tyrosine hydroxylase immunocytochemistry. J Chem Neuroanat 18:117–133
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Arima Y, Yokota S, Fujitani M (2019) Lateral parabrachial neurons innervate orexin neurons projecting to brainstem arousal areas in the rat. Sci Rep 26:2830
Google Scholar
Aston-Jones G, Card JP (2000) Use of pseudorabies virus to delineate multisynaptic circuits in brain: opportunities and limitations. J Neurosci Meth 103:51–61
CAS Google Scholar
Atasoy D, Aponte Y, Su HH, Sternson SM (2008) A FLEX switch targets Channelrhodopsin-2 to multiple cell types for imaging and long-range circuit mapping. J Neurosci 28:7025–7030
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Atoji Y, Wild JM (2004) Fiber connections of the hippocampal formation and septum and subdivisions of the hippocampal formation in the pigeon as revealed by tract tracing and kainic acid lesions. J Comp Neurol 475:426–461
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Atoji Y, Sarkar S, Wild JM (2018) Differential projections of the densocellular and intermediate parts of the hyperpallium in the pigeon (Columba livia). J Comp Neurol 526:146–165
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bäckman CM, Malik N, Zhang YJ, Shan L, Grinberg A, Hoffer BJ, Westphal H, Tomac AC (2006) Characterization of a mouse strain expressing Cre recombinase from the 3′ untranslated region of the dopamine transporter locus. Genesis 44:383–390
PubMed Google Scholar
Bácskai T, Veress G, Halasi G, Matesz C (2010) Crossing dendrites of the hypoglossal motoneurons: possible morphological substrate of coordinated and synchronized tongue movements of the frog, Rana esculenta. Brain Res 1313:89–96
PubMed Google Scholar
Bak IJ, Markham CH, Cook ML, Stevens JG (1977) Intraaxonal transport of Herpes simplex virus in the rat central nervous system. Brain Res 136:415–429
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Barbier M, Fellmann D, Risold PY (2018) Morphofunctional organization of the connections from the medial and intermediate parts of the central nucleus of the amygdala Into distinct divisions of the lateral hypothalamic area in the rat. Front Neurol 9:00688
Google Scholar
Basbaum AI, Menetrey D (1987) Wheat germ agglutinin–apoHRP gold: a new retrograde tracer for light- and electron-microscopic single and double-label studies. J Comp Neurol 261:306–318
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Beier KT (2019) Hitchhiking on the neuronal highway: mechanisms of transsynaptic specificity. J Chem Neuroanat 99:9–17
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Beier KT, Mundell NA, Pan YA, Cepko C (2017) Anterograde or retrograde transsynaptic circuit tracing in vertebrates with vesicular stomatitis virus vectors. Curr Protoc Neurosci 74:1.26.1–1.26.27
Google Scholar
Bentivoglio M, Kuypers HG, Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Dann O (1979) Fluorescent retrograde neuronal labeling in rat by means of substances binding specifically to adenine-thymine rich DNA. Neurosci Lett 12:235–240
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bentivoglio M, Kuypers HG, Castman-Berrevoets CE, Loewe H, Dann O (1980) Two new fluorescent retrograde neuronal tracers which are transported over long distances. Neurosci Lett 18:25–30
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Berendse HW, Galis-de Graaf Y, Groenewegen HJ (1992a) Topographical organization and relationship with ventral striatal compartments of prefrontal corticostriatal projections in the rat. J Comp Neurol 316:314–347
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Berendse HW, Groenewegen HJ, Lohman AH (1992b) Compartmental distribution of ventral striatal neurons projecting to the mesencephalon in the rat. J Neurosci 12:2079–2103
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bharali DJ, Klejbor I, Stachowiak EK, Dutta P, Roy I, Kaur N, Bergey EJ, Prasad PN, Stachowiak MK (2005) Organically modified silica nanoparticles: a nonviral vector for in vivo gene delivery and expression in the brain. PNAS 102:11539–11544
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bloem B, Schoppink L, Rotaru DC, Faiz A, Hendriks P, Mansvelder HD, van de Berg WD, Wouterlood FG (2014) Topographic mapping between basal forebrain cholinergic neurons and the medial prefrontal cortex in mice. J Neurosci 34:16234–16246
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boeckers TM, Kreutz MR, Winter C, Zuschratter W, Smalla KH, Sanmarti-Vila L, Wex H, Langnaese K, Bockmann J, Garner CC, Gundelfinger ED (1999) Proline-rich synapse-associated protein-1/cortactin binding protein 1 (ProSAP1/CortBP1) is a PDZ-domain protein highly enriched in the postsynaptic density. J Neurosci 19:6506–6518
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bolam JP (ed) (1992) Experimental neuroanatomy. A practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford (ISBN 0-19-963326-8)
Google Scholar
Bolam JP, Ingham CA (1990) Combined morphological and histochemicalk techniques for the study of neuronal microcircuits. In: Wouterlood FG, Van den Pol AN (eds) Analysis of neuronal microcircuits and synaptic interactions. Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy (Björklund A, Hökfelt T (Eds)), vol 8. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 125–198
Google Scholar
Boldogköi Z, Reichart A, Tóth IE, Sik A, Erdélyi F, Medveczky I, Llorens-Cortes C, Palkovits M, Lenkei Z (2002) Construction of recombinant pseudorabies viruses optimized for labeling and neurochemical characterization of neural circuitry. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 109:105–118
PubMed Google Scholar
Boulland J-L, Jenstad M, Boekel A, Wouterlood FG, Edwards RH, Storm-Mathisen J, Chaudhry FA (2009) Vesicular glutamate and GABA transporters sort to distinct sets of vesicles at a symmetric synapse. Cereb Cortex 19:241–248
PubMed Google Scholar
Bowyer JF, Schmued LC (2006) Fluoro-Ruby labeling prior to an amphetamine neurotoxic insult shows a definitive massive loss of dopaminergic terminals and axons in the caudate-putamen. Brain Res 1075:236–239
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brandt HM, Apkarian AV (1992) Biotin-dextran: a sensitive anterograde tracer for neuroanatomic studies in rat and monkey. J Neurosci Meth 45:87–98
Google Scholar
Broms J, Grahm M, Haugegaard L, Blom T, Meletis K, Tingström A (2017) Monosynaptic retrograde tracing of neurons expressing the G-protein coupled receptor Gpr151 in the mouse brain. J Comp Neurol 525:3227–3250
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Buhl EH, Lübke J (1989) Intracellular lucifer yellow injection in fixed brain slices combined with retrograde tracing, light and electron microscopy. Neuroscience 28:3–16
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Callahan CA, Yoshikawa S, Thomas JB (1998) Tracing axons. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:582–586
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Callaway EM (2008) Transneuronal circuit tracing with neurotropic viruses. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18:617–623
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Callaway EM, Luo L (2015) Monosynaptic circuit tracing with glycoprotein-deleted rabies viruses. J Neurosci 35:8979–8985
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Castle M, Aymerich MS, Sánchez-Escobar C, Gonzalo N, Obeso JA, Lanciego JL (2005) Thalamic innervation of the direct and indirect basal ganglia pathways in the rat: ipsi- and contralateral projections. J Comp Neurol 483:143–153
PubMed Google Scholar
Catalano SM, Robertson RT, Killackey HP (1996) Individual axon morphology and thalamocortical topography in developing rat somatosensory cortex. J Comp Neurol 367:36–53
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chamberlin NL, Du B, de Lacalle S, Saper CB (1998) Recombinant adeno-associated virus vector: use for transgene expression and anterograde tract tracing in the CNS. Brain Res 793:169–175
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chang HT, Kuo H, Whittaker JA, Cooper NG (1990) Light and electron microscopic analysis of projection neurons retrogradely labeled with Fluoro-Gold: notes on the application of antibodies to Fluoro-Gold. J Neurosci Meth 35:31–37
CAS Google Scholar
Chatterjee S, Sullivan HA, MacLennan BJ, Xu R, Hou YY, Lavin TK, Lea NE, Michalski JE, Babcock KR, Dietrich S, Matthews GA, Beyeler A, Calhoon GG, Glober G, Whitesell JD, Yao S, Cetin A, Harris JA, Zeng H, Tye KM, Reid RC, Wickersham IR (2018) Nontoxic, double-deletion-mutant rabies viral vectors for retrograde targeting of projection neurons. Nat Neurosci 21:638–646
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen S, Aston-Jones G (1998) Axonal collateral-collateral transport of tract tracers in brain neurons: false anterograde labelling and useful tool. Neuroscience 82:1151–1163
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen Y-C, Sheng J, Trang P, Liu F (2018) Potential application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system against Herpesvirus Infections. Viruses 10:291
PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen YC, Ma NX, Pei ZF, Wu Z, Do-Monte FH, Keefe S, Yellin E, Chen MS, Yin JC, Lee G, Minier-Toribio A, Hu Y, Bai YT, Lee K, Quirk GJ, Chen G (2019) A NeuroD1 AAV-based gene therapy for functional brain repair after ischemic injury through in vivo astrocyte-to-neuron conversion. Mol Ther. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.09.003(Epub ahead of print)
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cipolloni PB, Hersch SM, White EL (1985) The use of lectin transport in the mouse central nervous system as an anterograde axonal marker for electron microscopy. Neurosci Lett 58:43–47
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Coen L, Osta R, Maury M, Brûlet P (1997) Construction of hybrid proteins that migrate retrogradely and transsynaptically into the central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9400–9405
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Conte WL, Kamishina H, Reep RL (2009a) The efficacy of the fluorescent conjugates of cholera toxin subunit B for multiple retrograde tracing in the central nervous system. Brain Struct Funct 213:3667–3673
Google Scholar
Conte WL, Kamishina H, Reep RL (2009b) Multiple neuroanatomical tract-tracing using fluorescent Alexa Fluor conjugates of cholera toxin subunit B in rats. Nature Prot 4:1158–1166
Google Scholar
Cowan WM, Cuénod M (eds) (1975) The use of axonal transport for studies in neuronal connectivity. Amsterdam, Elsevier, p 382
Google Scholar
Cowan WM, Gottlieb DI, Hendrickson AE, Price JL, Woolsey TA (1972) The autoradiographic demonstration of axonal connections in the central nervous system. Brain Res 37:21–51
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dai J, Swaab DF, Buijs RM (1998a) Recovery of axonal transport in “dead neurons”. Lancet 351:499–500
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dai J, Van Der Vliet J, Swaab DF, Buijs RM (1998b) Postmortem anterograde tracing of intrahypothalamic projections of the human dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus. J Comp Neurol 401:16–33
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
D’aniello B, Luongo L, Rastogi RK, Di Meglio M, Pinelli C (2015) Tract-tracing study of the extrabulbar olfactory projections in the brain of some teleosts. Microsc Res Techn 78:268–276
Google Scholar
Deller T, Naumann T, Frotscher M (2000) Retrograde and anterograde tracing combined with transmitter identification and electron microscopy. J Neurosci Meth 103:117–126
CAS Google Scholar
Deng Y, Lanciego JL, Kerkerian-Le Goff L, Coulon P, Salin P, Lei W, DelMar N, Reiner A (2015) Differential organization of cortical inputs to striatal projection neurons of the matrix compartment in rats. Front Syst Neurosci 9:51
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Egensperger R, Holländer H (1988) Electron microscopic visualization of fluorescent microspheres used as a neuronal tracer. J Neurosci Meth 23:181–186
CAS Google Scholar
Erro E, Lanciego JL, Giménez-Amaya JM (1999) Relationships between thalamostriatal neurons and pedunculopontine projections to the thalamus: a neuroanatomical tract-tracing study in the rat. Exp Brain Res 127:162–170
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fallon JH, Seroogy KB (1984) Visual and auditory pathways contain cholecystokinin: evidence from immunofluorescence and retrograde tracing. Neurosci Lett 45:81–87
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fan RJ, Marin-Burgin A, French KA, Otto Friesen W (2005) A dye mixture (Neurobiotin and Alexa 488) reveals extensive dye-coupling among neurons in leeches; physiology confirms the connections. J Comp Physiol A 191:1157–1171
Google Scholar
Feng G, Mellor RH, Bernstein M, Keller-Peck C, Nguyen QT, Wallace M, Nerbonne JM, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR (2000) Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron 28:41–51
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fink RP, Heimer L (1967) Two methods for selective silver impregnation of degenerating axons and their synaptic endings in the central nervous system. Brain Res 4:369–374
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fremeau RT Jr, Voglmaier S, Seal RP, Edwards RH (2004) VGLUTs define subsets of excitatory neurons and suggest novel roles for glutamate. Trends Neurosci 27:98–103
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Friedrich VL Jr, Mugnaini E (1981) Electron microscopy: preparation of neural tissue for electron microscopy. In: Heimer L, Robards MJ (eds) neuroanatomical tract-tracing methods. Plenum Press, New York, pp 345–376
Google Scholar
Fritzsch B, Wilm C (1990) Dextran amines in neuronal tracing. Trends Neurosci 13:14
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fritzsch B, Muirhead KA, Feng F, Gray BD, Ohlsson-Wilhelm BM (2005) Diffusion and imaging properties of three new lipophilic tracers, NeuroVue Maroon, NeuroVue Red and NeuroVue Green and their use for double and triple labeling of neuronal profile. Brain Res Bull 66:249–258
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fuschiotti P, Schoehn G, Fender P, Fabry CM, Hewat EA, Chroboczek J, Ruigrok RW, Conway JF (2006) Structure of the dodecahedral penton particle from human adenovirus type 3. J Mol Biol 356:510–520
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gabriele ML, Smoot JE, Jiang H, Stein BE, McHaffie (2006) Early establishment of adult-like nigrotectal architecture in the neonatal cat: a double-labeling study using carbocyanine dyes. Neuroscience 137:1309–1319
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gautier A, Geny D, Bourgoin S, Bernard JF, Hamon M (2017) Differential innervation of superficial versus deep laminae of the dorsal horn by bulbo-spinal serotonergic pathways in the rat. IBRO Rep 2:72–80
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Géral C, Angelova A, Lesieur S (2013) From molecular to nanotechnology strategies for delivery of neurotrophins: emphasis on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Pharmaceutics 5:127–167
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gerfen CR, Sawchenko PE (1984) An anterograde neuroanatomical tracing method that shows the detailed morphology of neurons, their axons and terminals: immunohistochemical localization of an axonally transported plant lectin, Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L). Brain Res 290:219–238
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gerfen CR, Sawchenko PE (1985) A method for anterograde axonal tracing of chemically specified circuits in the central nervous system: combined Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) tract tracing and immunohistochemistry. Brain Res 343:144–150
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ghanem A, Conzelmann KK (2016) G gene-deficient single-round rabies viruses for neuronal circuit analysis. Virus Res 216:41–54
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Glover JC, Petursdottir G, Jansen JKS (1986) Fluorescent dextran amines used as axonal tracers in the nervous system of chicken embryo. J Neurosci Meth 18:243–254
CAS Google Scholar
Godement P, Vanselow J, Thanos S, Bonhoeffer F (1987) A study in developing visual systems with a new method of staining neurones and their processes in fixed tissue. Development 101:697–713
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gonzalo N, Moreno A, Erdozain MA, García P, Vázquez A, Castle M, Lanciego JL (2001) A sequential protocol combining dual neuroanatomical tract-tracing with the visualization of local circuit neurons within the striatum. J Neurosci Meth 111:59–66
CAS Google Scholar
Grafstein B (1967) Transport of protein by goldfish optic nerve fibers. Science 157(3785):196–198
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Graham RC, Karnovsky MJ (1965) The histochemical demonstration of monoamine oxidase activity by coupled peroxidatic oxidation. J Histochem Cytochem 13:604–605
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Groenewegen HJ, Wouterlood FG (1990) Light and electron microscopic tracing of neuronal connections with Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHAL), and combinations with other neuroanatomical techniques. In: Wouterlood FG, Van den Pol AN (eds) Analysis of neuronal microcircuits and synaptic interactions. Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy (Björklund A, Hökfelt T Eds), vol 8. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 47–124
Google Scholar
Grove EA, Domesick VB, Nauta WHJ (1986) Light microscopic evidence of striatal input to intrapallidal neurons of cholinergic cell group Ch4 in the rat: a study employing the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA–L). Brain Res 367:379–384
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gumbs MCR, Vuuregge AH, Eggels L, Unmehopa UA, Lamuadni K, Mul JD, Fleur LA (2019) Afferent neuropeptide Y projections to the ventral tegmental area in normal-weight male Wistar rats. J Comp Neurol 527:2659–2674
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hafner G, Witte M, Guy J, Subhashini N, Fenno LE, Ramakrishnan C, Kim YS, Deisseroth K, Callaway EM, Oberhuber M, Conzelmann KK, Staiger JF (2019) Mapping Brain-wide afferent inputs of parvalbumin-expressing GABAergic neurons in barrel cortex reveals local and long-range circuit motifs. Cell Rep 28:3450–3461
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hancock MB (1986) Two-color immunoperoxidase staining: visualization of anatomic relationships between immunoreactive neural elements. Am J Anat 175:343–352
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harris JA, Oh SW, Zeng H (2012) Adeno-associated viral vectors for anterograde axonal tracing with fluorescent proteins in nontransgenic and Cre driver mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci (Suppl) 59:Unit 1.20
Google Scholar
Harrison SC (2010) Looking inside adenovirus. Science 329:1026–1027
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Heilingoetter C, Jensen MB (2016) Histological methods for ex vivo axon tracing: a systematic review. Neurol Res 38:561–569
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Herrera M, Hurtado-García JF, Collia F, Lanciego J (1994) Projections from the primary auditory cortex onto the dorsal cortex of the inferior colliculus in albino rats. Arch Ital Biol 132:147–164
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hill TJ, Field HJ, Roome APC (1972) Intra-axonal location of Herpes Simplex virus particles. J Gen Virol 15:253–255
Google Scholar
Honig M (1993) DiI labelling. Neurosci Prot 93-050-16-01- 20
Honig MG, Hume RI (1986) Fluorescent carbocyanine dyes allow living neurons of identified origin to be studied in long-term cultures. J Cell Biol 103:171–187
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hoogland PV, Wouterlood FG, Welker E, Van der Loos H (1991) Ultrastructure of giant and small thalamic terminals of cortical origin: a study of the projections from the barrel cortex in mice using Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L). Exp Brain Res 87:159–172
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Horikawa K, Armstrong WE (1988) A versatile means of intracellular labeling: injection of biocytin and its detection with avidin conjugates. J Neurosci Meth 25:1–11
CAS Google Scholar
Huisman AM, Ververs B, Cavada C, Kuypers HG (1984) Collateralization of brainstem pathways in the spinal ventral horn in rat as demonstrated with the retrograde fluorescent double-labeling technique. Brain Res 300:362–367
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Husband SA, Shimizu T (1999) Efferent projections of the ectostriatum in the pigeon (Columba livia). J Comp Neurol 406:329–345
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jansen AS, Wessendorf MW, Loewy AD (1995) Transneuronal labeling of CNS neuropeptide and monoamine neurons after pseudorabies virus injections into the stellate ganglion. Brain Res 683:1–24
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jensen-Smith H, Gray B, Muirhead K, Ohlsson-Wilhelm B, Fritzsch B (2007) Long-distance three-color neuronal tracing in fixed tissue using NeuroView dyes. Immunol Invest 36:763–789
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnson RT (1964) The pathogenesis of herpes virus encephalitis. I. Virus pathways to the nervous system of suckling mice demonstrated by fluorescent antibody. J Exp Med 119:343
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jongen-Rêlo AL, Amaral DG (2000) A double labeling technique using WGA-apoHRP-gold as a retrograde tracer and non-isotopic in situ hybridization histochemistry for the detection of mRNA. J Neurosci Meth 101:9–17
Google Scholar
Jung SK, Morimoto R, Otsuka M, Omote H (2006) Transmembrane topology of vesicular glutamate transporter 2. Biol Pharm Bull 29:547–549
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Junyent F, Kremer E (2015) CAV-2—why a canine virus is a neurobiologist’s best friend. Curr Opin Pharmacol 24:86–93
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kajiwara R, Wouterlood FG, Sah A, Boekel AJ, Baks-te Bulte LT, Witter MP (2008) Convergence of entorhinal and CA3 inputs onto pyramidal neurons and interneurons in hippocampal area CA1—an anatomical study in the rat. Hippocampus 18:266–280
PubMed Google Scholar
Karra D, Dahm R (2010) Transfection techniques for neuronal cells. J Neurosci 30:6171–6177
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Katz LC (1987) Local circuitry of identified projection neurons in cat visual cortex brain slices. J Neurosci 7:1223–1249
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Katz LC, Iarovici DM (1990) Green fluorescent latex microspheres: a new retrograde tracer. Neuroscience 34:511–520
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Katz LC, Burkhalter A, Dreyer W (1984) Fluorescent latex microspheres as a retrograde neuronal marker for in vivo and in vitro studies of visual cortex. Nature 310:489–500
Google Scholar
Keizer K, Kuypers HG (1989) Distribution of corticospinal neurons with collaterals to the lower brain stem reticular formation in monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Exp Brain Res 74:311–318
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Keizer K, Kuypers HG, Huisman AM, Dann O (1983) Diamidino yellow dihydrochloride (DY 2HCl); a new fluorescent retrograde neuronal tracer, which migrates only very slowly out of the cell. Exp Brain Res 51:179–191
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kelly RM, Strick PL (2004) Macro-architecture of basal ganglia loops with the cerebral cortex: use of rabies virus to reveal multisynaptic circuits. Progr Brain Res 143:449–459
Google Scholar
Kim EJ, Jacobs MW, Ito-Cole T, Callaway EM (2016) Improved monosynaptic neural circuit tracing using engineered rabies virus glycoproteins. Cell Rep 15:692–699
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
King MA, Louis PM, Hunter BE, Walker DW (1989) Biocytin: a versatile anterograde neuroanatomical tract-tracing alternative. Brain Res 497:361–367
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kita H, Armstrong W (1991) A biotin-containing compound N-(2-aminoethyl)biotinamide for intracellular labeling and neuronal tracing studies: comparison with biocytin. J Neurosci Meth 37:141–150
CAS Google Scholar
Klausberger T, Somogyi P (2008) Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science 321(5885):53–57
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Köbbert C, Apps R, Bechmann I, Lanciego JL, Mey J, Thanos S (2000) Current concepts in neuroanatomical tracing. Progr Neurobiol 62:327–352
Google Scholar
Kononenko NL, Witter MP (2012) Presubiculum layer III conveys retrosplenial input to the medial entorhinal cortex. Hippocampus 22:881–895
PubMed Google Scholar
Kristensson K (1970) Transport of fluorescent protein in peripheral nerves. Acta Neuropathol 16:293–300
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kristensson K, Olsson Y (1971a) Uptake and retrograde transport of peroxidase in hypoglossal neurons. Electron microscopical localization in the neuronal perikaryon. Acta Neuropathol 19:1–9
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kristensson K, Olsson Y (1971b) Retrograde axonal transport of protein. Brain Res 29:363–365
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kristensson K, Ghetti B, Wiśniewski HM (1974) Study on the propagation of herpes simplex virus (type 2) into the brain after intraocular injection. Brain Res 69:189–201
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kristensson K, Nennesmo I, Persson L, Lycke E (1982) Neuron to neuron transmission of Herpes Simplex virus. J Neurol Sci 54:149–156
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kuhlman SJ, Huang ZJ (2008) High-resolution labeling and functional manipulation of specific neuron types in mouse brain by Cre-activated viral gene expression. PLoS One 3:e2005
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kulik A, Matesz K, Székely G (1994) Mesencephalic projections of the cochlear nucleus in the frog, Rana esculenta. Acta Biol Hung 45:323–335
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kuypers HG, Bentivoglio M, van der Kooy D, Castman-Berrevoets CE (1979) Retrograde transport of bisbenzimide and propidium iodide through axons to their parent cell bodies. Neurosci Lett 12:1–7
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kuypers HG, Bentivoglio M, Castman-Berreveoets CE, Bharos AT (1980) Double retrograde neuronal labeling through divergent axon collaterals, using two fluorescent tracers with the same excitation wavelength which label different features of the cell. Exp Brain Res 40:383–392
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lanciego JL, Wouterlood FG (1994) Dual anterograde axonal tracing with Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) and biotinylated dextran amine (BDA). Neurosci Prot 94:6–13
Google Scholar
Lanciego JL, Wouterlood FG (2006) Multiple neuroanatomical tract-tracing: approaches for multiple tract tracing. In: Zaborszky L, Wouterlood FG, Lanciego JL (eds) Neuroanatomical tract-tracing 3: molecules, neurons, and systems. Springer, New York, pp 336–365
Google Scholar
Lanciego JL, Wouterlood FG (2011) A half century of experimental neuroanatomical tracing. J Chem Neuroanat 42:157–183
PubMed Google Scholar
Lanciego JL, Goede PH, Witter MP, Wouterlood FG (1997) Use of peroxidase substrate Vector^® VIP for multiple staining in light microscopy. J Neurosci Meth 74:1–7
CAS Google Scholar
Lanciego JL, Wouterlood FG, Erro E, Giménez-Amaya JM (1998a) Multiple axonal tracing: simultaneous detection of three tracers in one and the same section. Histochem Cell Biol 110:509–515
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lanciego JL, Luquin MR, Guillén J, Giménez-Amaya JM (1998b) Multiple neuroanatomical tracing in primates. Brain Res Prot 2:323–332
CAS Google Scholar
Lanciego JL, Wouterlood FG, Erro E, Arribas J, Gonzalo N, Urra X, Cervantes S, Giménez-Amaya J (2000) Complex brain circuits studied via simultaneous and permanent detection of three neuroanatomical tracers in the same histological section. J Neurosci Meth 103:127–135
CAS Google Scholar
Lanciego JL, Gonzalo N, Castle M, Sánzhez-Escober C, Aymerich MS, Obeso JA (2004) Thalamic innervation of striatal and subthalamic neurons projecting to the rat entopeduncular nucleus. Eur J Neurosci 19:1267–1277
PubMed Google Scholar
Lapper SR, Bolam JP (1991) The anterograde and retrograde transport of neurobiotin in the central nervous system of the rat: comparison with biocytin. J Neurosci Meth 39:163–174
CAS Google Scholar
LaVail JH, LaVail MM (1972) Retrograde axonal transport in the central nervous system. Science 176:1416–1417
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li D, Seeley PJ, Bliss TVP, Raisman G (1990) Intracellular injection of biocytin into fixed tissue and its detection with avidin-HRP. Neurosci Lett Suppl 38:581
Google Scholar
Li S-J, Vaughan A, Sturgilkl JF, Kepecs A (2018) A viral receptor complementation strategy to overcome CAV-2 tropism for efficient retrograde targeting of neurons. Neuron 98:905–917
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liang FY, Moret V, Wiesendanger M, Rouiller EM (1991) Corticomotoneuronal connections in the rat: evidence from double-labeling of motoneurons and corticospinal axon arborizations. J Comp Neurol 311:356–366
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liguz-Lecznar M, Skangiel-Kramska J (2007) Vesicular glutamate transporters (VGLUTs): the three musketeers of glutamatergic system. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 67:207–218
Google Scholar
Lindh B, Aldskogius H, Hökfelt T (1989) Simultaneous immunohistochemical demonstration of intra-axonally transported markers and neuropeptides in the peripheral nervous system of the guinea pig. Histochem 92:367–376
CAS Google Scholar
Liu WL, Behbehani MM, Shipley MT (1993) Intracellular filling in fixed brain slices using Miniruby, a fluorescent biocytin compound. Brain Res 608:78–86
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lo L, Anderson DJ (2011) A cre-dependent, anterograde transsynaptic viral tracer for mapping output pathways of genetically marked neurons. Neuron 72:938–950
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Loewy AD (1995) Pseudorabies virus: a transneuronal tracer for neuroanatomical studies. In: Keplitt M, Loewy AD (eds) Viral vectors: gene therapy and neuroscience applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 349–366
Google Scholar
López IP, Salin P, Kachidian P, Barroso-Chinea P, Rico AJ, Gómez-Bautista V, Conte-Perales L, Coulon P, Kerkerian-Le Goff L, Lanciego JL (2010) The added value of rabies virus as a retrograde tracer when combined with dual anterograde tract-tracing. J Neurosci Meth 194:21–27
Google Scholar
Luo L, Callaway EM, Svoboda K (2018) Genetic dissection of neural circuits: a decade of progress. Neuron 98:256–281
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Luppi PH, Fort P, Jouvet M (1990) Iontophoretic application of unconjugated choleratoxin B subunit (CTB) combined with immunohistochemistry of neurochemical substances: a method for transmitter identification of retrogradely labeled neurons. Brain Res 534:209–224
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lyckman AW, Fan G, Rios M, Jaenisch R, Sur M (2005) Normal eye-specific patterning of retinal inputs to murine subcortical visual nuclei in the absence of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Vis Neurosci 22:27–36
PubMed Google Scholar
Ma DL, Qu J, Goh EL, Tang FR (2016) Reorganization of basolateral amygdala-subiculum circuitry in mouse epilepsy model. Front Neuroanat 9:167
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, Ng LL, Palmiter RD, Hawrylycz MJ, Jones AR, Lein ES, Zeng H (2010) A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 13:133–140
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maeda S, Fujihira M, Minato Y, Kuwahara-Otani S, Tanaka K, Hayakawa T, Yagi H (2017) Differential distribution of renal nerves in the sympathetic ganglia of the rat. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 300:2263–2272
CAS Google Scholar
Makarenko IG (2007) Prenatal carbocyanine dye tracing of septo-hypothalamic connections. Brain Res 1130:38–47
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Martin X, Dolivo M (1983) Neuronal and transneuronal tracing in the trigeminal system of the rat using the herpes virus suis. Brain Res 273:253–276
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Maskos U, Kissa K, St Cloment C, Brulet P (2002) Retrograde trans-synaptic transfer of green fluorescent protein allows the genetic mapping of neuronal circuits in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10120–10125
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mazarakis ND, Azzouz M, Rohll JB, Ellard FM, Wilkes FJ, Olsen AL, Carter EE, Barber RD, Baban DF, Kingsman SM, Kingsman AJ, O’Malley K, Mitrophanous KA (2001) Rabies virus glycoprotein pseudotyping of lentiviral vectors enables retrograde axonal transport and access to the nervous system after peripheral delivery. Hum Mol Genet 10:2109–2121
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mebatsion T, Gonzelmann KK (1996) Specific infection of CD4 + target cells by recombinant rabies virus pseudotypes carrying the HIV-1 envelope spike protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:11366–11370
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mendoza KC, McLane VD, Kim S, Griffin JD (2010) In vitro application of gold nanoprobes in live neurons for phenotypical classification, connectivity assessment, and electrophysiological recording. Brain Res 1325:19–27
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mesulam M-M (1982) Tracing neural connections with horseradish peroxidase. Handbook series: methods in the neurosciences. Wiley, Chichester
Google Scholar
Mesulam MM, Rosene DL (1979) Sensitivity in HRP neurohistochemistry: a comparative and quantitative study of nine methods. J Histochem Cytochem 27:763–773
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Molnar Z, Blackey D, Bysron I, Carney R (2006) Tract-tracing in developing systems and in postmortem human material using carbocyanine dyes. In: Zaborszky L, Lanciego JL, Wouterlood FG (eds) Neuroanatomical tract-tracing methods: molecules, neurons, and systems, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 366–393
Google Scholar
Morecraft RJ, Ugolini G, Lanciego JL, Wouterlood FG, Pandya DN (2009) Classic and contemporary neural tract tracing techniques. In: Johansen-Berg H, Behrens T (eds) Diffusion MRI: from quantitative measurement to in vivo neuroanatomy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 273–308
Google Scholar
Morecraft RJ, Binneboese A, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, Ge J (2017) Localization of orofacial representation in the corona radiata, internal capsule and cerebral peduncle in Macaca mulatta. J Comp Neurol 525:3429–3457
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mufson EJ, Brady DR, Kordower JH (1990) Tracing neuronal connections in postmortem human hippocampal complex with the carbocyanine dye DiI. Neurobiol Aging 11:649–653
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Naidoo J, Stanek LM, Ohno K, Trewman S, Samaranch L, Hadaczek P, O’Riordan C, Sullivan J, San Sebastian W, Bringas JR, Snieckus C, Mahmoodi A, Mahmoodi A, Forsayeth J, Bankiewicz KS, Shihabuddin LS (2018) Extensive transduction and enhanced spread of a modified AAV2 capsid in the non-human primate CNS. Mol Ther 26:2418–2430
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nance DM, Burns J (1990) Fluorescent dextrans as sensitive anterograde neuroanatomical tracers: applications and pitfalls. Brain Res Bull 25:139–145
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nassi JJ, Cepko CL, Born RT, Beier KT (2015) Neuroanatomy goes viral! Front Neuroanat 9:80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2015.00080
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nauta WJ, Gygax PA (1951) Silver impregnation of degenerating axon terminals in the central nervous system: (1) Technic. (2) Chemical notes. Stain Technol 26:5–11
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Neely MD, Stanwood GD, Deutch AY (2009) Combination of diOlistic labeling with retrograde tract tracing and immunohistochemistry. J Neurosci Meth 184:332–336
Google Scholar
Northcutt RG (2011) Olfactory projections in the white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus: an experimental study. J Comp Neurol. 519:1999–2022
PubMed Google Scholar
Northcutt RG, Westhoff G (2011) Connections of the medial telencephalic wall in the spotted African lungfish. Brain Behav Evol Neurol 77:14–32
Google Scholar
Osakada F, Mori T, Cetin AH, Mrashel JH, Virgen B, Callaway EM (2011) New rabies virus variants for monitoring and manipulating activity and gene expression in defined neural circuits. Neuron 71:617–631
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Otake K, Sasaki H, Ezure K, Manabe M (1988) Axonal projections from Bötzinger expiratory neurons to contralateral ventral and dorsal respiratory groups in the cat. Exp Brain Res 72:167–177
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Oyibo HK, Znamenskiy P, Oviedo HV, Enquist LW, Zador AM (2014) Long-term Cre-mediated retrograde tagging of neurons using a novel recombinant pseudorabies virus. Front Neuroanat 8:86
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Peel AL, Zolotukhin S, Schrimsher GW, Muzyczka N, Reier PJ (1997) Efficient transduction of green fluorescent protein in spinal cord neurons using adeno-associated virus vectors containing cell type-specific promoters. Gene Ther 4:16–24
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pignataro D, Sucunza D, Rico AJ, Dopeso-Reyes IG, Roda E, Rodríguez-Pérez AI, Labandeira-García JL, Broccoli V, Kato S, Kobayashi K, Lanciego JL (2018) Gene therapy approaches in the non-human primate model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 125:575–589
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pinault D (1996) A novel single-cell staining procedure performed in vivo under electrophysiological control: morpho-functional features of juxtacellularly labeled thalamic cells and other central neurons with biocytin or Neurobiotin. J Neurosci Meth 65:113–136
CAS Google Scholar
Pomeranz LE, Reynolds AE, Hengartner CJ (2005) Molecular biology of peudorabies vrus: impact on neurovirology and veterinary medicine. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69:462–500
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Porrero C, Rubio-Garrido P, Avendaño C, Clascá F (2010) Mapping of fluorescent protein-expressing neurons and axon pathways in adult and developing Thy1-eYFP-H transgenic mice. Brain Res 1345:59–72
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Raab M, Boeckers TM, Neuhuber WL (2010) Proline-rich synapse-associated protein-1 and 2 (ProSAP1/Shank2 and ProSAP2/Shank3)-scaffolding proteins are also present in postsynaptic specializations of the peripheral nervous system. Neuroscience 171:421–433
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Raux H, Iseni F, Lafay F, Blondel D (1997) Mapping of monoclonal antibody epitopes of the rabies virus P protein. J Gen Virol 78:119–124
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Reardon TR, Murray AJ, Turi GF, Wirblich C, Croce KR, Schnell MJ, Jessell TM, Losonczy A (2016) Rabies virus CVS-N2c ΔG strain enhances retrograde synaptic transfer and neuronal viability. Neuron 89:711–724
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Reiner A, Honig MG (2006) Dextran amines: versatile tools for anterograde and retrograde studies of nervous system connectivity. In: Zaborszky L, Wouterlood FG, Lanciego JL (eds) Neuroanatomical tract-tracing 3: molecules, neurons, and systems. Springer, New York, pp 304–335
Google Scholar
Reiner A, Veenman CL, Honig MG (1993) Anterograde tracing using biotinylated dextran amine. Neurosci Prot 93(section):050-14
Google Scholar
Reiner A, Veenman CL, Medina L, Jiao Y, Del Mar N, Honig MG (2000) Pathway tracing using biotinylated dextran amines. J Neurosci Meth 103:23–37
CAS Google Scholar
Rhoades RW, Fish SE, Chiaia NL, Bennett-Clarke C, Mooney RD (1989) Organization of the projections from the trigeminal brainstem complex to the superior colliculus in the rat and hamster: anterograde tracing with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin and intra-axonal injection. J Comp Neurol 289:641–656
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ribeiro EA, Necto AR, Pomeranz LE, Ekstrand MI, Koo JW, Nestker EJ (2019) Viral labeling of neurons synaptically connected to nucleus accumbens somatostatin interneurons. PlosOne 14(3):e0213476
CAS Google Scholar
Rice CD, Weber SA, Waggoner AL, Jessell ME, Yates BJ (2010) Mapping of neural pathways that influence diaphragm activity and project to the lumbar spinal cord in cats. Exp Brain Res 203:205–211
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Richmond FJ, Gladdy R, Creasy JL, Kitamura S, Smits E, Thomson DB (1994) Efficacy of seven retrograde tracers, compared in multiple-labelling studies of feline motoneurones. J Neurosci Meth 53:35–46
CAS Google Scholar
Rico AJ, Dopeso-Reyes IG, Martínez-Pinilla E, Sucunza D, Pignataro D, Roda E, Marín-Ramos D, Labandeira-García JL, George SR, Franco R, Lanciego JL (2017) Neurochemical evidence supporting dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromers in the striatum on the long-tailed macaque: changes following dopaminergic manipulation. Brain Struct Funct 222:1767–1784
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rockland KS (1995) Morphology of individual axons projecting from area V2 to MT in the macaque. J Comp Neurol 355:15–26
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rosene DL, Roy NJ, Davis BJ (1986) A cryoprotection method that facilitates cutting frozen sections of whole monkey brains for histological and histochemical processing without freezing artifact. J Histochem Cytochem 34:1301–1315
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Pudavar HE, Bergey EJ, Oseroff AR, Morgan J, Dougherty TJ, Prasad PN (2003) Ceramic-based nanoparticles entrapping water-insoluble photosensitizing anticancer drugs: a novel drug-carrier system for photodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc 125:7860–7865
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ruigrok TJ, Apps R (2007) A light microscope-based double retrograde tracer strategy to chart central neuronal connections. Nat Protoc 2:1869–1878
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ruigrok TJH, Teune TM, van der Burg J, Sabel-Goedknegt H (1995) A retrograde double labeling technique for light microscopy. A combination of axonal transport of cholera toxin B-subunit and a gold-lectin conjugate. J Neurosci Meth 61:127–138
CAS Google Scholar
Ruigrok TJ, Hensbroek RA, Simpson JI (2011) Spontaneous activity signatures of morphologically identified interneurons in the vestibulocerebellum. J Neurosci 31:224–712
Google Scholar
Russchen FT, Jonker AJ (1988) Efferent connections of the striatum and the nucleus accumbens in the lizard Gekko gecko. J Comp Neurol 276:61–80
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Salin P, Castle M, Kachidian P, Barroso-Chinea P, López IP, Rico AJ, Kerkerian-Le Goff L, Coulon P, Lanciego JL (2008) High-resolution neuroanatomical tract-tracing for the analysis of striatal microcircuits. Brain Res 1221:49–58
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Salin P, López IP, Kachidian P, Barroso-Chinea P, Rico AJ, Gómez-Bautista V, Coulon P, Kerkerian-Le Goff L, Lanciego JL (2009) Changes to interneuron-driven striatal microcircuits in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 34:545–552
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sauer B (1998) Inducible gene targeting in mice using the cre/lox system. Methods 14:381–392
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schmued LC (2016) Development and application of novel histochemical tracers for localizing brain connectivity and pathology. Brain Res 1645:31–35
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schmued LC, Fallon JH (1986) Fluoro-Gold: a new fluorescent retrograde axonal tracer with numerous unique properties. Brain Res 377:147–154
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schmued LC, Heimer L (1990) Iontophoretic injection of fluoro-gold and other fluorescent tracers. J Histochem Cytochem 38:721–723
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schmued L, Kyriakidis K, Heimer L (1990) In vivo anterograde and retrograde axonal transport of the fluorescent rhodamine dextran-amine, Fluoro-Ruby, within the CNS. Brain Res 526:127–134
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schofield BR, Schofield RM, Sorensen Motts SD (2007) On the use of retrograde tracers for identification of axon collaterals with multiple fluorescent retrograde tracers. Neuroscience 146:773–783
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Shafton AD, McAllen RM (2013) Location of cat brain stem neurons that drive sweating. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 304:R804–R809
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sik, Tamamaki N, Freund TF (1993) Complete axon arborization of a single CA3 pyramidal cell in the rat hippocampus, and its relationship with postsynaptic parvalbumin-containing interneurons. Eur J Neurosci 5:1719–1728
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Smith Y (1992) Anterograde tracing with PHA-L and biocytin at the electron microscopic level. In: Bolam JP (ed) Experimental neuroanatomy, a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 61–79
Google Scholar
Smith Y, Hazrati LN, Parent A (1990) Efferent projections of the subthalamic nucleus in the squirrel monkey as studied by the PHA-L anterograde tracing method. J Comp Neurol 294:306–323
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sodeik B (2000) Mechanisms of viral transport in the cytoplasm. Trends Microbiol 8:465–472
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Söderberg O, Leuchowius KJ, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Weibrecht I, Larsson LG, Landegren U (2008) Characterizing proteins and their interaction in cells and tissues using the in situ proximity ligation assay. Methods 45:227–232
PubMed Google Scholar
Sohal VS, Zhang F, Yizhar O, Deisseroth K (2009) Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance. Nature 459:698–702s
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Staiger JF, Wouterlood FG (1990) Efferent projections from the lateral septal nucleus to the anterior hypothalamus in the rat: a study combining Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin tracing with vasopressin immunocytochemistry. Cell Tiss Res 261:17–23
CAS Google Scholar
Strack AM, Loewy AD (1990) Pseudorabies virus: a highly specific transneuronal cell body marker in the sympathetic nervous system. J Neurosci 10:2139–2147
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stretton AOW, Kravitz EA (1968) Neuronal geometry: determination with a technique of intracellular dye injection. Science 162:132–134
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sun S, Schaffer DV (2018) Engineered viral vectors for functional interrogation, deconvolution, and manipulation of neural circuits. Curr Opin Neurobiol 50:163–170
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sun Y, Nguyen AQ, Nguyen JP, Le L, Saur D, Choi J, Callaway EM, Xu X (2014) Cell-type-specific circuit connectivity of hippocampal CA1 revealed through Cre-dependent rabies tracing. Cell Rep 7:269–280
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Swanson LW (1981) Tracing central pathways with the autoradiographic method. J Histochem Cytochem 29:117–124
PubMed Google Scholar
Szabó E, Csáki Á, Boldogkői Z, Tóth Z, Köves K (2015) Identification of autonomic neuronal chains innervating gingiva and lip. Auton Neurosci 190:10–19
PubMed Google Scholar
Tamamaki N, Yanagawa Y, Tomioka R, Miyazaki J, Obata K, Kaneko T (2003) Green fluorescent protein expression and colocalization with calretinin, parvalbumin, and somatostatin in the GAD67-GFP knock-in mouse. J Comp Neurol 467:60–79
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tanahira C, Higo S, Watanabe K, Tomioka R, Ebihara S, Kaneko T, Tamamaki N (2009) Parvalbumin neurons in the forebrain as revealed by parvalbumin-Cre transgenic mice. Neurosci Res 63:213–223
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Taniguchi H, He M, Wu P, Kim S, Paik R, Sugino K, Kvitsiani D, Fu Y, Lu J, Lin Y, Miyoshi G, Shima Y, Fishell G, Nelson SB, Huang ZJ (2011) A resource of Cre driver lines for genetic targeting of GABAergic neurons in cerebral cortex. Neuron 71:995–1013
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Taverna S, van Dongen YC, Groenewegen HJ, Pennartz CM (2004) Direct physiological evidence for synaptic connectivity between medium-sized spiny neurons in rat nucleus accumbens in situ. J Neurophysiol 91:1111–1121
PubMed Google Scholar
Teague Goodpasture EW (1923) Transmission of the virus of herpes febrilis along nerves in experimentally infected rabbits. J Med Res 44:39
Google Scholar
Tervo DG, Hwang BY, Viswanathan S, Gai T, Lavzin M, Ritola KD, Lindo S, Michael S, Kuleshova E, Ojala D, Huang CC, Gerfen CR, Schiller J, Dudman JT, Hantman AW, Looger LL, Schaffer DV, Karpova AY (2016) A designer AAV variant permits efficient retrograde access to projection neurons. Neuron 92:372–382
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Thompson AM, Thompson GC (1987) Efferent projections from posteroventral cochlear nucleus to lateral superior olive in guinea pig. Brain Res 421:382–386
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Toney GM, Daws LC (2006) Juxtacellular labeling and chemical phenotyping of extracellularly recorded neurons in vivo. Meth Mol Biol 337:127–137
CAS Google Scholar
Tordo J, O’Leary C, Antunes ASLM, Palomar N, Aldrin-Kirk P, Basche M, Bennet A, D’Souza Z, Gleitz H, Godwin A, Holley RJ, Parker H, Liao AY, Rouse P, Saam Youshani A, Dridi L, Martins C, Levade T, Stacey KB, Davis DM, Dyer A, Clément N, Björklund T, Ali RR, Agbandje-McKenna M, Rahim AA, Pshezhetsky A, Waddington SN, Linden RM, Bigger BW, Henckaerts E (2018) A novel adeno-associated virus capsid with enhanced neurotropism corrects a lysosomal transmembrane enzyme deficiency. Brain 141:2014–2031
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Trojanowski JQ (1983) Native and derivatized lectins for in vivo studies of neuronal connectivity and neuronal cell biology. J Neurosci Meth 9:185–204
CAS Google Scholar
Trojanowski JQ, Gonatas JO, Gonatas NK (1981) Conjugates of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) with cholera toxin and wheat germ agglutinin are superior to free HRP as orthogradely transported markers. Brain Res 223:381–385
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ugolini G (1995) Specificity of rabies virus as a transneuronal tracer of motor networks: transfer from hypoglossal motoneurons to connected second-order and higher order central nervous system cell groups. J Comp Neurol 356:457–480
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ugolini G (2010) Advances in viral transneuronal tracing. J Neurosci Meth 194:2–20
Google Scholar
Ugolini G, Kuypers HG (1986) Collaterals of corticospinal and pyramidal fibers to the pontine gray demonstrated by a new application of the fluorescent fibre labeling technique. Brain Res 365:211–227
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ugolini G, Kuypers HGJM, Simmons A (1987) Retrograde transneuronal transfer of Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV1) from motoneurons. Brain Res 422:242–256
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ugolini G, Kuypers HG, Strick PL (1989) Transneuronal transfer of herpes virus from peripheral nerves to cortex and brainstem. Science 243(4887):89–91
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Unal G, Paré JF, Smith Y, Paré D (2014) Cortical inputs innervate calbindin-immunoreactive interneurons of the rat basolateral amygdaloid complex. J Comp Neurol 522:1915–1928
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van den Pol AN, Ghosh PK (1998) Selective neuronal expression of green fluorescent protein with cytomegalovirus promoter reveals entire neuronal arbor in transgenic mice. J Neurosci 18:10640–10651
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Van der Kooy D, Sawchenko PE (1982) Characterization of serotonergic neurons using concurrent fluorescent retrograde axonal tracing and immunohistochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem 30:794–798
PubMed Google Scholar
Van der Kooy D, Steinbusch HWM (1980) Simultaneous fluorescent retrograde axonal tracing and immunofluorescent characterization of neurons. J Neurosci Res 5:479–484
PubMed Google Scholar
van der Want JJ, Klooster J, Cardozo BN, de Weerd H, Liem RS (1997) Tract-tracing in the nervous system of vertebrates using horseradish peroxidase and its conjugates: tracers, chromogens and stabilization for light and electron microscopy. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 1:269–279
PubMed Google Scholar
Veenman CL, Reiner A, Honig MG (1992) Biotinylated dextran amine as an anterograde tracer for single- and double-label studies. J Neurosci Methods 41:239–254
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vercelli A, Repici M, Garbossa D, Grimaldi A (2000) Recent techniques for tracing pathways in the central nervous system of developing and adult mammals. Brain Res Bull 51:11–28
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
von Engelhardt J, Eliava M, Meyer AH, Rozov A, Monyer H (2007) Functional characterization of intrinsic cholinergic interneurons in the cortex. J Neurosci 27:5633–5642
Google Scholar
Wan XS, Trojanowski JQ, Gonatas JO, Liu CN (1982) Cytoarchitecture of the extranuclear and commissural dendrites of hypoglossal nucleus neurons as revealed by conjugates of horseradish peroxidase with cholera toxin. Exp Neurol 78:167–175
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang J, Chi F-L, Xin Y, Regner MF (2013) The distribution of vestibular efferent neurons receiving innervation of secondary vestibular afferent nerves in rats. Laryngoscope 123:1266–1271
PubMed Google Scholar
Wang Q, Henry AM, Harris JA, Oh SW, Joines KM, Nyhus J, Hirokawa KE, Dee N, Mortrud M, Parry S, Ouellette B, Caldejon S, Bernard A, Jones AR, Zeng H, Hohmann JG (2014) Systematic comparison of adeno-associated virus and biotinylated dextran amine reveals equivalent sensitivity between tracers and novel projection targets in the mouse brain. J Comp Neurol 522:1989–2012
PubMed Google Scholar
Washbourne P, McAllister AK (2002) Techniques for gene transfer into neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:566–573
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Weissman TA, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW, Livet J (2011) Generating and imaging multicolor brainbow mice. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 7:763–769
Google Scholar
Wessendorf MW (1990) Characterization and use of multi-color fluorescence microscopic techniques. In: Björklund A, Hökfelt T, Wouterlood FG, van der Pol AN (eds) Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy, vol 8. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–45
Google Scholar
Wickersham IR, Finke S, Conzelmann K-K, Callaway EM (2007a) Retrograde neuronal tracing with a deletion-mutant rabies virus. Nat Meth 4:47–49
CAS Google Scholar
Wickersham IR, Lyon DC, Barnard RJ, Mori T, Finke S, Conzelmann KK, Young JA, Callaway EM (2007b) Monosynaptic restriction of transsynaptic tracing from single, genetically targeted neurons. Neuron 53:639–647
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Witten IB, Steinberg EE, Lee SY, Davidson TJ, Zalocusky KA, Brodsky M, Yizhar O, Cho SL, Gong S, Ramakrishnan C, Stuber GD, Tye KM, Janak PH, Deisseroth K (2011) Recombinase-driver rat lines: tools, techniques, and optogenetic application to dopamine-mediated reinforcement. Neuron 72:721–733
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wouterlood FG, Groenewegen HJ (1985) Neuroanatomical tracing by use of Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA L): electron microscopy of PHA L filled Neuronal Somata, Dendrites, Axons and Axon Terminals. Brain Res 326:188–191
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wouterlood FG, Jorritsma-Byham B (1993) The anterograde neuroanatomical tracer biotinylated dextran amine: comparison with the tracer PHA-L in preparations for electron microscopy. J Neurosci Meth 48:75–87
CAS Google Scholar
Wouterlood FG, Bol JGJM, Steinbusch HWM (1987) Double-label immunocytochemistry: combination of anterograde neuroanatomical tracing with Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin and enzyme immunocytochemistry of target neurons. J Histochem Cytochem 35:817–823
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wouterlood FG, Goede PH, Groenewegen HJ (1990) The in situ detectability of the neuroanatomical tracer Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin. J Chem Neuroanat 3:11–18
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wouterlood FG, Böckers T, Witter MP (2003) Synaptic contacts between identified neurons visualized in the confocal laser scanning microscope. Neuroanatomical tracing combined with immunofluorescence detection of postsynaptic density proteins and target neuron-markers. J Neurosci Meth 128:129–142
CAS Google Scholar
Wouterlood FG, van Haeften T, Eijkhoudt M, Baks-te-Bulte L, Goede PH, Witter MP (2004) Input from the presubiculum to dendrites of layer-V neurons of the medial entorhinal cortex of the rat. Brain Res 1013:1–12
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wouterlood FG, Boekel AJ, Meijer GA, Beliën JAM (2007) Computer assisted estimation in the CNS of 3D multimarker overlap or touch at the level of individual nerve endings. A confocal laser scanning microscope application. J Neurosci Res 85:1215–1228
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wouterlood FG, van Oort S, Bloemhard L, Flierman NA, Spijkerman J, Wright CI, Beliën JAM, Groenewegen HJ (2018a) Neurochemical fingerprinting of amygdalostriatal and intra-amygdaloid projections: a tracing-immunofluorescence study in the rat. J Chem Neuroanat 94:154–172
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wouterlood FG, Engel A, Daal M, Houwen G, Meinderts A, Jordà Siquier T, Beliën JAM, van Dongen YC, Scheel-Krüger J, Thierry AM, Groenewegen HJ, Deniau JM (2018b) Mesencephalic dopamine neurons interfacing the shell of nucleus accumbens and the dorsolateral striatum in the rat. J Neurosci Res 96:1518–1542
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xue HG, Yamamoto N, Yoshimoto M, Yang CY, Ito H (2001) Fiber connections of the nucleus isthmi in the carp (Cyprinus carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Brain Behav Evol 58:185–204
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yao F, Zhang E, Gao Z, Ji H, Marmouri M, Xia X (2018) Did you choose appropriate tracer for retrograde tracing of retinal ganglion cells? The differences between cholera toxin subunit B and Fluorogold. PLoS One 13(10):e0205133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205133
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zaborszky L, Wouterlood FG, Lanciego JL (2006) Neuroanatomical tract-tracing 3: molecules-neurons-systems. Springer, New York
Google Scholar
Zhang J, Zhang AJ, Wu SM (2006) Immunocytochemical analysis of GABA-positive and calretinin-positive horizontal cells in the tiger salamander retina. J Comp Neurol 499:432–441
PubMed Google Scholar
Zhao S, Maxwell S, Jimenez-Beristain A, Vives J, Kuehner E, Zhao J, O’Brien C, de Felipe C, Semina E, Li M (2004) Generation of embryonic stem cells and transgenic mice expressing green fluorescence protein in midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Eur J Neurosci 19:1133–1140
PubMed Google Scholar
Zhou N, Hao Z, Zhao X, Maharjan S, Zhu S, Song Y, Yang B, Lu L (2015) A novel fluorescent retrograde neural tracer: cholera toxin B conjugated carbon dots. Nanoscale 7:1563–1564
Google Scholar
Zhu X, Lin K, Liu Q, Yue X, Mi H, Huang X, He X, Wu R, Zheng D, Wei D, Jia L, Wang W, Manyande A, Wang J, Zhang Z, Xu F (2019) Rabies virus pseudotyped with CVS-N2C glycoprotein as a powerful tool for retrograde neuronal network tracing. Neurosci Bull. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-019-00423-3
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhuang X, Masson J, Gingrich JA, Rayport S, Hen R (2005) Targeted gene expression in dopamine and serotonin neurons of the mouse brain. J Neurosci Meth 43:27–32
Google Scholar
Zingg B, Dong H-W, Tao HW, Zhang LI (2018) Input–output organization of the mouse claustrum. J Comp Neurol 526:2428–2443
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

In the first place, we thank our tutors and mentors that took us long ago into our journey in the wonderful world of neuroanatomy: Francisco Collia, Anthony Lohman†, and Enrico Mugnaini. Throughout the years, there have been many collaborations. We would like to specially mention here work carried out together with Henk Groenewegen, Harry Steinbusch, Wolfgang Härtig, Menno Witter, Theo van Haeften, Karl Deisseroth, Laszlo Zaborszky, and Jeroen Beliën. Much work on the ChaT-eYFP-Cre-mouse reported in this review was done by Antonio Luchicci and Bernard Bloem. For multi-tracing experiments engaging rabies virus, we have had a long-time pleasant collaboration with Pascal Salin, Lydia Kerkerian-Le Goff, and Anthony Reiner. Experiments combining the PLA technique with retrograde tracing were performed in close collaboration with Rafael Franco. Expert technical assistance was provided by Peter Goede, John Bol, Amber Boekel-Boeve, Angela Engel, and Elvira Roda. Nico Blijleven was always at hand to keep the optoelectronic equipment and our computers up and running.

Funding

Current research of José L. Lanciego is supported by ERC Advanced Grant ref. 340,527, Ciberned’s intramural program ref. PI2017/02, FEDER/Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades–Agencia Estatal de Investigación ref. BFU2017-82407-R and by the Department of Health of the Government of Navarra refs. 046-2017_NAB7 and 0011-1383-2019-000006 (PI031).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Neurosciences Department, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pio XII Avenue 55, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
Jose L. Lanciego
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CiberNed), Pamplona, Spain
Jose L. Lanciego
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
Jose L. Lanciego
Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Floris G. Wouterlood

Authors

Jose L. Lanciego
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Floris G. Wouterlood
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jose L. Lanciego or Floris G. Wouterlood.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Animal handling was conducted at all times in accordance with the European Council Directive 2010/63/UE as well as in keeping with Spanish legislation (RD53/2013). The experimental design was approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Testing of the University of Navarra (refs: 037-00, 010-06, 009-12, 018-08, 021-17, and 016-17).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lanciego, J.L., Wouterlood, F.G. Neuroanatomical tract-tracing techniques that did go viral. Brain Struct Funct 225, 1193–1224 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02041-6

Download citation

Received: 06 October 2019
Accepted: 31 January 2020
Published: 15 February 2020
Issue Date: May 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02041-6

Keywords

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Neuroanatomical tract-tracing techniques that did go viral

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Generation of ‘semi-guided’ cortical organoids with complex neural oscillations

BDNF: A Key Factor with Multipotent Impact on Brain Signaling and Synaptic Plasticity

Cerebellum Lecture: the Cerebellar Nuclei—Core of the Cerebellum

Introduction: the legacy of the old school

Neuroanatomical tracing with transport methods

Anterograde axonal tracing with Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L)

PHA-L tracing protocol

General

Injection

Post-injection

Incubation

Recipe for one-dimensional PHA-L detection

Immunofluorescence detection

Advantages and disadvantages

Multi-dimensional tracing with PHA-L

Labeling of axon terminals and their (presumed) post-synaptic targets

Protocol

Mounting and coverslipping procedure for fluorescence imaging

Imaging

Note on diffraction-limited imaging

Analysis of acquired images

Axonal tracing with biotinylated dextran amine (BDA)

BDA tracing protocol

Application

Fixation and detection

Recipe for one-dimensional BDA detection

Results with BDA tracing

Advantages and disadvantages

Multi-dimensional BDA tracing: neurochemical fingerprinting

Example E: detection of GPCR heteromers within identified projection neurons

Biotin derivatives and carbocyanine dyes

Biocytin and neurobiotin

Carbocyanine dyes

Tritiated amino acids and radioautography

Particles: large and small

Non-fluorescent and fluorescent retrograde tracing

Good old horseradish peroxidase

Fluorescent retrograde tracers

Fluoro-Gold: application notes and source

An impressive track record: the CTB family

The slow, unstoppable rise of viruses as tracing tools

First-generation vector: neurotropic viruses

Recombinant viruses that transfect cells to produce a fluorescent marker

Sidestep into the world of adenoviruses

Viruses flipping the light switch in specific neurons

Microcircuit tracing with genetically altered rabies virus in Cre mice

Flipping light switches: AAV and neurotransmitter-specific tracing

Final notes

References

Acknowledgements

Funding

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Corresponding authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

Keywords

Search

Navigation