Figure - available from: Environmental Science and Pollution Research
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Van Krevelen plots for a, d CHON and b, e CHO molecular formulas in HC and THC samples, and c, f bar diagram indicates the contribution of major classes of CHON and CHO in HC and THC samples. The size of sphere is represented by the relative abundance of molecular formula. Boxes overlain on the plots indicate biomolecular compound classes

Van Krevelen plots for a, d CHON and b, e CHO molecular formulas in HC and THC samples, and c, f bar diagram indicates the contribution of major classes of CHON and CHO in HC and THC samples. The size of sphere is represented by the relative abundance of molecular formula. Boxes overlain on the plots indicate biomolecular compound classes

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
With the increased interest in the practical use of hydrochar, concerns about the possible environmental biotoxicity of hydrochar and its released dissolved organic matters (DOM) have grown. As a common method for removing bio-oil on the surface of hydrochar, the effect of organic solvent washing on the properties of hydrochar released DOM remains...

Citations

... In their recent review, Karatas et al. (2022) [37] point out that both organics and inorganics could play a role in phytoxicity, and numerous approaches for its reduction have been tried, ranging from washing and composting to thermal treatment. For example, washing with organic solvents and/or water mixtures was found to reduce organic compounds [38,39], but may require water washing to remove the solvent, depending on the application. The washing of hydrochars Sustainability 2024, 16, 338 3 of 24 ...
Article
Full-text available
The reuse potential for the large annual production of spent coffee grounds (SCGs) is underexploited in most world regions. Hydrochars from SCGs produced via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) have been recognized as a promising solid fuel alternative. To increase demand, optimization of the HTC and two post-treatment processes, washing and agglomeration, were studied to improve hydrochar in terms of energetic properties, minimizing unwanted substances, and better handling. HTC experiments at three scales (1–18.75 L) and varying process conditions (temperature T (160–250 °C), reaction time t (1–5 h), and solid content %So (6–20%) showed that the higher heating value (HHV) can be improved by up to 46%, and most potential emissions of trace elements from combustion reduced (up to 90%). The HTC outputs (solid yield—SY, HHV, energy yield—EY) were modeled and compared to published genetic programming (GP) models. Both model types predicted the three outputs with low error (<15%) and can be used for process optimization. The efficiency of water washing depended on the HTC process temperature and type of aromatics produced. The furanic compounds were removed (69–100%; 160 °C), while only 34% of the phenolic compounds (240 °C) were washed out. Agglomeration of both wet SCG and its hydrochar is feasible; however, the finer particles of washed hydrochar (240 °C) resulted in larger-sized spherical pellets (85% > 2000–4000 µm) compared to SCGs (only 4%).
Article
Hydrothermal carbonization of wet biomasses has been known to produce added-value materials for a wide range of applications. From catalyst substrates, to biofuels and soil amendments, hydrochars have distinct advantages to offer compared to conventional materials. With respect to the agricultural application of hydrochars, both positive and negative results have been reported. The presence of N, P and K in certain hydrochars is appealing and may contribute to the reduction of chemical fertilizer application. However, regardless of biomass, hydrothermal carbonization results in the production of phytotoxic organic compounds. Additionally, hydrochars from sewage sludge often contain heavy metal concentrations which exceed the regulatory limits set for agricultural use. This review critically discusses the phytotoxic aspects of hydrochar and provides an account of the substances commonly responsible for these. Furthermore, phytotoxicity reduction approaches are proposed and compared with each other, in view of field-scale applications.