&quot;The ‘Sea of Fire’ as a Chinese Manichaean Metaphor — Source Materials for Mapping an Unnoticed Image.&quot; Asia Major 24.2 (2011) 1–52.

Gábor Kósa

The assumption that an already established Zoroastrian religion served as the source for terms, concepts, and themes, which Mani and Manichaeans appropriated and altered, is due for reassessment. Building on the work of P. O. Skjaervø, this study argues that (1) Zoroastrianism and Manichaeism arose together, side by side, in the third century (2) against the background of older Iranian religious cultural traditions, (3) each fitting those antecedent cultural artifacts into different systems of interpretation and application.

the book of the Teaching of the Light featuring the book of Letters by the Persian prophet Mani AD 225-265 Gnostic chronology of the Order of Nazorean Essenes clip from timeline by Abba Yesai Nasrai, O:N:E: http://essenes.net/chronnaz.html Mani, a disciple of Thomas from the Elchasite monks in Iran, a monk-priest-prophet raised up right after the progress of Bardesanes AD 220, converting a Shah of India to follow the Gospel. the Teaching of the Light AD 216 Mar Mani, the promised Paraclete and Maitreya, was born on 8 Nissan, AD 216 in Mardinu, a little village in Iraq, and grows up in the Elchasite monastery after age 4. 222 Bardesanes died about 222, an important mystic and esoteric figure, and credited with the Nazorean essenesque Hymn of the Pearl found in the Acts of Thomas. AD 228 The angel At-Taum appears unto Mani in a vegetarian Elchasite monastery. (at age 12) 240 Mani separated from the Elkasite community in his 24th year, at the end of King Ardashir's reign.

A pproximately at the time when Abu Jaʿfar Mohammad b. Jarir Tabari was compiling his Tarikh al-Rasul wa al-Muluk, the High Priest Ādurbād ī Ēmēdān was compiling the Dēnkard and, along with other Zoroastrian sages, redacting important Pahlavi texts. The coming of the Abbasids and the establishment of Islam in fact appears to have driven many to look back and write a history of the past according to their communal perspective. For Zoroastrians, the process of writing down the tradition had already begun during the late Sasanian period. It seemed necessary to record the events of the past so that the leaders of the community of the Good Religion would be able to pass them down from their memory to the future co-religionists. This memory included a history that existed in oral and written form. For this sacred Zoroastrian histori-ography, of which Dēnkard IV is the best known source, the two most important polarizing and devastating events which had cataclysmic repercussions were the coming of Alexander of Macedon in the fourth century bce and that of the Arab Muslims in the seventh century ce. If one is to accept the narrative provided by the Dēnkard IV as well as the Ardā Wirāz Nāmag, these two historical calamities created dire situations for the Good Religion. These texts state that the first event resulted in the murder of the Magi, and the motley crew of Greco-Macedonians who decimated the memory of the Avesta, and as a result doubt and heterodoxy was brought to fore. 1 Another Zoroastrian reads the event as such (SE 4–5): pas zardušt dēn āwurd az framān ī wištāsp-šāh 1000 ud 200 fragard pad dēn dibīrīh pad taxtagīhā ī zarrēn kand ud nibišt ud pad ganj ī ān ātaxš nihād. Ud pas gizistag skandar sōxt ud andar ō drayāb abgand Then Zoroaster brought the Religion. By the order of King Vištāsp 1200 fragards (chapters) in the writing of religious scripture were engraved on golden tablets and written and deposited in the treasury of that fire-temple. And then the accursed Alexander burnt them and threw them into the sea 2

the chinese manichaean sea of fire gábor kósa The Sea of Fire as a Chinese Manichaean Metaphor: Source Materials for Mapping an Unnoticed Image I n this essay I concentrate on what is merely a small part of a larger Manichaean cosmogonical narrative. In order to understand this small part, it is useful first to summarize the turning points of the history of Manichaeism, and then give a brief overview of the Manichaean sources used. In this first part, my presentation will provide general and simplified information in order to make some basic facts accessible to those who are not students of Manichaeism. The most substantial portion of the essay elaborates on a single image – the “Sea of Fire” – and associated concepts by collecting and comparing the available Chinese and non-Chinese Manichaean texts. The aim is to show how the Chinese Manichaean texts at our disposal derive in certain ways from a stock of Western-language forebears, and how certain themes and linguistic forms from the latter texts remained in the Chinese counterparts. Another aim is to show how such themes are related to both Manichaean religious ideas and Chinese concepts. MAnIChAeISM A Short History of the Religious Movement Mƒn… (216–ca. 277 ad), the founder of Manichaeism, was born not far from the capital of the Arsacid empire (ca. 250 bc−226 ad), Seleucia-Ctesiphon, and was brought up in a Jewish-Christian baptismal community (elchasaites) to which his father Patt…g brought the young The first version of this essay was written with the help of a postdoctoral scholarship from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (FY2008); it was completed with a scholarship from the Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation for International Scholarly exchange (PD003-U-09). I am greatly indebted to my JSPS host researcher, Prof. Yutaka Yoshida, who helped me in many ways during my stay in Kyoto. I am deeply thankful to howard L. Goodman for invaluable suggestions and also grateful for the comments of Asia Major’s anonymous reviewers. 1 gábor kósa Mƒn… during the time of the last Arsacid ruler, Ardawƒn (r. 213–224 ad). According to Manichaean sources, he received several private revelations during his years in this community, including two major ones from his heavenly Twin (Gk.: syzygos) that gave him the knowledge (Gk.: gn±sis) of how the universe came into being and why the human race was created. After finding contradictions between his own revelations and the teachings of the elchasaite community, Mƒn… left them and made his first public appearance in 240 ad. At that point he started his mission. First, in 240–241 ad, he traveled to the farthest part of the empire, northwestern India (Tˆrƒn, Sindh) by sea, where he converted the formerly Buddhist king of Tˆrƒn kingdom, Tˆrƒn-›ƒh. After his return from India, Mƒn… continued his mission by converting two brothers of the ruling Sasanian house, Mihr-›ƒh (Lord of Mesene) and P‰r±z, after which in 242 he gained an audience at the main court of šƒbuhr I (r. 241−272 ad). Mƒn… remained in the emperor’s retinue and was later authorized to disseminate his teachings in the Persian empire (245–255 ad). Between 255 and 260 Mƒn… was proselytizing in the northeastern part of Iran, then settled in Weh-Ardah›…r on the western bank of the Tigris (near Ctesiphon) in order to organize his church. he sent missionaries to India and the Roman empire, including egypt, Parthia and Marw. Missions to Palmyra, Georgia, Armenia, Asia Minor and the Arabian peninsula were also launched. While šƒbuhr’s successor, king Šhrmazd I (r. 272−273 ad), still supported Mƒn…, nonetheless with the enthronement of Bahrƒm I (r. 274–277 ad) the successful spread of the new religion encountered a substantial obstacle: the Zoroastrian priests, especially Kerd…r the Mowbed, considered the new religion a threat to their own power, and persuaded Bahrƒm I to imprison Mƒn… in B‰th Lapa¾ (Gond‰›ƒpˆr), where he was chained for twenty-six days, before dying on February 26, 277. 1 Despite the death of its founder, the new religion spread quickly in the Roman empire. Mƒr S…sin, Papos, Mƒr Zakˆ and Abzaxyƒ created several Manichaean communities in Rome, Alexandria and Upper egypt, with some writings in Greek and Latin, and many scriptures in Coptic (Sub-Akhmimic or Lykopolitan dialect). Roman emperors tried to stop the spread of Manichaeism by legal prohibitions (for example, Diocletian in 302, Valentinian in 372, Justinian in 527). In addition, Manichaeism came under heavy attack by Christian apologists who 1 For a summary of Mƒn…’s life, see Werner Sundermann, “Mani,” in Encyclopedia Iranica (http://www.iranica.com/articles/ mani-founder-manicheism), accessed July 11, 2010. 2 the chinese manichaean sea of fire considered it a dangerous heresy. The most famous opponent was Augustine of hippo (354−430 ad), who himself had been a Manichaean between 373−382. In several writings exclusively dedicated to the subject (such as Contra Faustum, Contra Felicem, Contra Fortunatum, Contra epistulam Fundamenti) and in various other works, Augustine made every effort to delegitimize Manichaeism. Christian theologians and leaders (for example, Leo, the Great in 445) succeeded to the extent that Manichaeism slowly disappeared from the Roman empire by the 600s. The mission to the east was based on the third century achievements of Mƒr Amm±, later on Manichaeans further developed their religious communities. With additional centers in Abar›ahr, Marw, Balkh–²mˆ Daryƒ, and with more and more Parthian and Sogdian converts, the spread of Manichaeism entered into a new and more successful phase. With the eastern shift, Manichaeism entered the Transoxanian regions where Manichaean scriptures in Parthian, Sogdian and, later, Uyghur languages were written. In 694 ad Manichaean missionaries reached the court of the Chinese empress Wu Zetian 武則天 (r. 690−705 ad). The history of Manichaeism in China can be roughly divided into two phases: from 694 to 842 Manichaeism was basically a religio licita (between 731–750 allowed only for foreigners). The first known Manichaean missionary arrived at the Chinese court in 694, and the empress welcomed the new teaching. 2 In 732 in an edict by the emperor Xuanzong 玄宗 (r. 712–756 ad) Manichaeans were accused of pretending to be Buddhists, and with the exception of “Western barbarians” (xihu 西胡), presumably referring to Sogdians, they were prohibited from their practice. 3 The Uyghur Bögü Khan officially adopted Manichaeism as a state religion in 762/763. When the rebellion of An Lushan 安祿山 and Shi Chaoyi 史朝義 (755−763 ad) was terminated by the military intervention of the Uyghurs, the dependence of the Chinese court on the Uyghurs forced the Chinese emperors to allow the religion. Several Manichaean temples were built in Luoyang 洛陽 and other prefectures (Jing 荊, Yang 揚, hong 洪, Yue 越), and scriptures were translated into Chinese. 4 After their defeat by the Kirghiz in 840, the steppe Uyghurs fled, portions settling in Qo¢o (Turfan) and continuing to practice their religion for at least 150 years; they produced important pieces of 2 Fozu tongji 佛祖統記, as printed in Takakusu Junjir± 高楠順次郎 and Watanabe Kaigyoku 渡邊海旭, eds., Taish± shinshˆ daiz±ky± 大正新修大藏經 (Tokyo: Taish± Issaiky± Kank±kai, 1924–1932; hereafter T. ) 49.2035: 370a, 474c. 3 Fozu tongji T. 49.2035: 374c, 474c, Da Song sengshilüe 大宋僧史略 T. 54.2126: 253b. 4 Fozu tongji T. 49.2035: 370a, 378c, 474c, Da Song sengshilüe T. 54.2126: 253c. 3 gábor kósa Manichaean art. 5 When Chinese emperors no longer were dependent on Uyghur help, emperor Wuzong 武宗 (r. 840−846 ad) could launch a massive attack against all foreign religions in China in 843–845, including Manichaeism, Zoroastrianism and Buddhism. 6 As can be gleaned from a Chinese historical source (Minshu 閩書), it was after 845 that Chinese Manichaeans moved from the northern part of the country to the southeast, especially to Fujian and Zhejiang. Under the guidance of a certain hulu fashi 呼祿法師 (“hulu” probably referring to Uyghur ulu�, or great dharma-teacher), Chinese Manichaeans seem to have reorganized their apparently extant small communities and survived at least until the sixteenth century. 7 Besides the written sources that report about their presence in these regions, we also possess concrete bits of evidence: a Manichaean temple with a unique statue of Mƒn…, archaeological finds of bowls with the inscription Ming jiao hui 明教會 (“Community of the Religion of Light”), and several Yuan-Mingera paintings (presently preserved in Japan) that attest to a Manichaean presence in southeastern China. 8 Manichaean Texts Similarly to later Manichaean missionaries, the founder Mƒn…, who was the author of six works in Syriac and one in Middle Persian, considered translation into local languages as the most important part of the mission. Whenever Manichaeans entered a new region, they translated Mƒn…’s works and composed in Mƒn…’s spirit new works in the local languages. In the West, aside from the apologetic literature of the Church Fathers, we possess original Manichaean works, such as the Greek Cologne Mƒn… Codex (found in egypt in 1969 and preserved in Cologne), the Tebessa Codex (found in Algeria in 1918, housed in Paris), and the presently published three great Coptic works (the Psalm-book, the Kephalaia and the Homilies), with some new findings from Kellis (Dakhleh Oasis in Upper egypt). 5 Zsuzsanna Gulácsi, Manichaean Art in Berlin Collections, Corpus Fontium Manichaeorum, Series Archaeologica et Iconographica 1 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2001). 6 Xin Tangshu 新唐書 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1975), j. 217, p. 6133; Jiu Tangshu 舊唐書 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1975), j. 18, p. 594. 7 he Qiaoyuan 何喬遠, comp., Minshu 閩書, j. 7 (Fuzhou: Fujian renmin chubanshe, 1994), vol. 1, pp. 171–72. 8 For a general history of Manichaeism, see Samuel n. C. Lieu, Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China. A Historical Survey, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum neuen Testament 63 (2nd edn., Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1992). 4 the chinese manichaean sea of fire From the Christian apologetic literature, I will quote relevant passages from the fourth-century works of Titus of Bostra (Contra Manichaeos), St. ephrem (Prose Refutations), Serapion Thmuitanus (Adversus Manichaeos), hegemonius (Acta Archelai, 330–348 ad) and Augustinus (De natura boni). From our point of view, the most important Coptic works are the fourth-century Psalm-book, a collection of about 360 psalms for various liturgical occasions, such as the Psalms of the Bema, or addressed to various divinities (for example, Psalms to Jesus), and the fourth-century Kephalaia, allegedly expounded by Mƒn… in response to the questions of his disciples on cosmogony, cosmology and numerous other topics. While the Psalm-book was mainly used in a liturgical context, the Kephalaia was relatively more doctrinal. The present article also uses excerpts from the Coptic materials excavated from Kellis in modern times. 9 Unlike the archaeologically excavated psalms and letters of the Kellis material, the codices of the Coptic Psalm-book, Homilies and Kephalaia, which ultimately derive from Med…net Mƒd… (Gk.: narmoûthis), were purchased from dealers between 1930−1932 and are presently housed in Dublin and Berlin. 10 Moving eastward, aside from a handful of comments by Syriac and Arabic authors (including Th. bar K±n…, an-nad…m, al-B…rˆn…), we have several original Manichaean writings at our disposal: Middle Persian, Parthian, Sogdian and Uyghur fragments, nearly all deriving from the Turfan region and preserved in Berlin, and three Chinese Manichaean scriptures – the Compendium, the Hymnscroll, and the Traité – all found in Dunhuang, Cave 17. The Middle Iranian fragments, 11 usually given a number preceded by the letter M (for Manichaean), include ecclesiastic history, cosmo9 The Psalm-book is quoted from Charles R.C. Allberry, A Manichaean Psalm-Book. Part II, Manichaean Manuscripts in the Chester Beatty Collection, vol. 2 (Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1938); the Kephalaia from Alexander Böhlig and hans Jacob Polotsky, eds. and trans., Kephalaia I,1. Hälfte (Lieferung 1–10), Manichäische handschriften der Staatlichen Museen Berlin 1 (Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1940), and Alexander Böhlig, ed., Kephalaia I,2. Hälfte (Lieferung 11–12), Manichäische handschriften der Staatlichen Museen Berlin 1 (Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1966), and Iain Gardner, trans., The Kephalaia of the Teacher: The Edited Coptic Manichaean Texts in Translation with Commentary (Leiden: e.J. Brill, 1995). The Kellis texts are cited according to Iain Gardner (with S. Clackson and M. Franzmann and K.A. Worp), Kellis Literary Texts. Vol. 1, Dakhleh Oasis Project Monograph 4; Oxbow Monograph 69 (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1996). The best available collection of translated texts from the Roman empire is Iain Gardner and S.n.C. Lieu, Manichaean Texts from the Roman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004). 10 On these codices see James Robinson, “The Fate of the Manichaean Codices of Medinet Madi 1929−1989,” in Gernot Wiessner and hans-Joachim Klimkeit, eds., Studia Manichaica II. Internationaler Kongress zum Manichäismus 6−10, August 1989, St Augustin/Bonn (Wiesbaden: Otto harrassowitz, 1992), pp. 19−62. 11 For a recent summary of Middle Iranian Manichaean texts, see Werner Sundermann, 5 gábor kósa gonical and cosmological descriptions, prayers and confessions, letters and postscripts, various parables, and beautiful hymns to the church leaders and the divinities of the Manichaean pantheon. The most important Middle Iranian texts for us here are those composed in Parthian by Mƒn…’s followers: the third-to-fourth-century Angad r±›nƒn (“Rich in Light”) and Huyadagmƒn (“Fortunate for Us”), which are hymn-cycles on the lamentations of the soul suffering in the bondage of matter (hyl‰ ) and its desire to return to the Realm of Light. 12 Though Uyghur Manichaean texts also comprise cosmogonical, cosmological and historical texts, various hymns, and prayers, the most typical examples are pieces of an elaborated confessional literature (X uƒstvƒn…ft). 13 For the purposes of this article, at this point we must pay attention to the three Chinese Manichaean texts. 14 The Compendium (Moni guangfo jiaofa yilüe 摩尼光佛教法儀略) is an introduction to basic concepts written in Chinese by a Manichaean high priest in 731 ad at the behest of Xuanzong (S.3969, P.3884). Our most important source will be the so-called Hymnscroll (Moni jiao xiabu zan 摩尼教下部讚; referred to in the main body of the present article as h , with a following number, for example, “ h. 19” would indicate the nineteenth column of the Hymnscroll manuscript). It was found in Dunhuang and is housed in the British Library (S.2659); it was translated from a Middle Iranian language by a certain Daoming 道明. It is a long manuscript (1044 x 28 cm) consisting of hymns to various divine beings (Jesus, Mƒn…, the Father of Light, Light envoys, Five Lights, and others) which were sung by the Manichaean believers at diverse liturgical occasions. The other important Chinese source for this article will be the so-called Traité (Bosi jiao canjing 波斯教殘經; referred to, below, as tr , also followed by column numbers of the manuscript). It too was found in Dunhuang and is housed in Beijing at the national Library China (BD00256); it “Manichaean Literature in Iranian Language,” in Ronald e. emmerick and Maria Macuch, eds., ehsan Yarshater, gen. ed., The Literature of Pre-Islamic Iran: Companion Volume I (London: Macmillan Press, 2008), pp. 197−265. 12 The Huyadagmƒn is quoted according to Werner Sundermann, trans., The Manichaean Hymn-cycles Huyadagmƒn and Angad R±›nƒn in Parthian and Sogdian (London: SOAS, 1990; hereafter MhA), including Sundermann’s emendations; the Angad r±›nƒn is quoted from Mary Boyce, The Manichaean Hymn-cycles in Parthian, London Oriental Series 3 (London, new York, Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1954; hereafter MhP ). 13 A good collection of translated Middle Iranian and Uyghur texts is hans-Joachim Klimkeit, trans., Gnosis on the Silk Road: Gnostic Texts from Central Asia (new York: harperSanFrancisco, 1993; hereafter GSR). 14 For a concise summary of the Chinese Manichaean texts, see Gunner B. Mikkelsen, “More Light on the Chinese Manichaean Texts from Dunhuang and Turfan: A Publication Overview and Some Comments on X. Tremblay’s Sérinde,” Manichaean Studies Newsletter 18 (2003), pp. 25–32. 6 the chinese manichaean sea of fire contains general material on Manichaean cosmogony followed by a detailed narrative on the works of the so-called Light-nous, an important figure in the complex Manichaean pantheon. This text (621 x 21.5 cm) was also translated from Middle Iranian, presumably Parthian, and in addition has Middle Persian, Sogdian and Uyghur parallels. 15 Consistency and Inconsistency in the Manichaean Doctrines The fundamental structure of the mythological and cosmogonical background of Manichaeism remained remarkably consistent from Upper egypt to southeastern China. The Coptic texts and the Chinese scriptures, as well as the Middle Iranian and Uyghur fragments between them, basically reveal a consistent religious system, as far as the Two Principles, Three Periods and the majority of a highly complex series of emanations constituting the Manichaean cosmogony are concerned. Moreover, they fundamentally also share the same value-system (ethics) and hierarchical church organization, which mirrored these cosmogonical concepts. The theory of Two Principles refers to two eternally present realms – Light and Darkness; this duality, which also entails a fundamental opposition, never ceases to exist. The concept is usually termed an ontological dualism, which is often considered as the most essential constituent element of the Manichaean doctrine. In fact, an equally important, though less well-known, concept is that of the Three Periods, which divides universal history thus: First Period: The empires of Light and Darkness, having existed side by side, ultimately saw an attack launched by Darkness against the Realm of Light. Second Period: As a response, the king of the Realm of Light, the Father of Greatness, defended his kingdom by emanating various divine figures (Mother of Life, Friend of Lights, Light-nous, to name but a few). After several mythological events, the Light that was swallowed and captured by the forces of the Darkness is retrieved through the creation of the universe which, with help from Manichaean believers (especially the “chosen ones,” or elects), works like a huge purifying machine: it distills the captured light 15 These three Chinese Manichaean scriptures are abbreviated thus: TR. = Traité; H = Hymnscroll; C = Compendium. The texts are quoted according to their ms. column. Due to technical reasons some character variants are quoted in their standard form. They were also included in Taish± shinshˆ daiz±ky±; for Compendium, see T. 54.2141a: 1279c– 1281a; Traité is at T. 54.2141b: 1281a–1286a; and Hymnscroll is at T. 54.2140: 1270b–1279c. Buddhist texts are quoted according to the Taish±. All other primary sources are indicated in the footnotes. Translations of all Chinese texts are those of the author. 7 gábor kósa particles and transports them back to the Realm of Light. This is also the period of human history, in the last phase of which the maximum quantity of Light has been saved, people are judged, and after a great fire the world collapses. Third Period: The two realms become separate again forever, this time without the possibility of contacting one another in the future. The consistency of this structure and these fundamental religious tenets, however, does not mean that there were no differences among regional versions of Manichaeism. Such differences could concern actual religious practices (for instance, monasteries, confessional rituals, and the importance of certain festivals), doctrinal issues like the role of the Third Messenger and Jesus, or the final fate of light particles, and literary metaphors and expressions (as will be seen later in this paper). The consistency that we do see for centuries, ranging from Persia to China, is nonetheless surprising, especially when one considers the Manichaean missionaries’ technique in eurasia: they did not only translate their words into the language of the empire they aimed to “conquer,” but they also sought out religious analogies that could make their rather peculiar system more accessible to potential converts. They used Christian terminology in the West, Zoroastrian in Iran, and Buddhist in the east. It should be stressed that Christianity, and especially the figure of Jesus in a Manichaean interpretation, played a pivotal role in the entire system, even in the Buddhism-inspired Chinese scriptures. Though Manichaeism is frequently termed as par excellence a so-called syncretistic religion, it was, in fact, not syncretistic but synthetic in its origin, and exceptionally flexible and adaptive in its mission. 16 In China, for example, Manichaean missionaries appropriated the contemporary Buddhist discourse of the Tang dynasty and applied the unique terminology of popular Buddhist sutras in their translation process. 17 Thus original Manichaean works were rendered not merely into Chinese, but into Buddho-Chinese garb. Chinese Manichaean 16 For a recent summary of Manichaean missionary technique, see Werner Sundermann, “Manichaeism IV. Missionary Activity and Technique” (http://www.iranica.com/articles/ manicheism-iv-missionary-activity-and-technique-), accessed July 11, 2010. 17 See e.g. Gunner B. Mikkelsen, “Skilfully Planting the Trees of Light: The Chinese Manichaica, Their Central Asian Counterparts, and Some Observations on the Translation of Manichaeism into Chinese,” in Søren Clausen, ed., Cultural Encounters: China, Japan and the West: Essays Commemorating 25 Years of East-Asian Studies at the University of Aarhus (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 1995), pp. 83–108; Gunner Mikkelsen, “Sukhƒvat… and the Light-world: Pure Land elements in the Chinese Manichaean Eulogy of the Light-world,” in Jason D. BeDuhn, ed., New Light on Manichaeism: Papers from the Sixth International Congress on Manichaeism (Leiden: Brill, 2009), pp. 201−12. 8 the chinese manichaean sea of fire scriptures, as will be clear from the examples cited, abound with typical Budhist expressions such as buddha (fo 佛), hell (diyu 地獄), sa¿sƒra (lunhui 輪迴), nirvƒ¡a (niepan 涅槃), wish-fulfilling jewel (ruyi bao 如意寶), dharma-gate (famen 法門), and bliss (anle 安樂, Sk.: sukhƒ), which, however, appear in an unmistakably Manichaean context. 18 While sifting through the plethora of sutras in Cave 17 (Mogao), Paul Pelliot was himself misled by the seemingly Buddhist idioms of the so-called Manichaean Traité. 19 The linguistic dexterity and the terminological ingenuity of the Manichaean translators is mirrored in the natural use of the Buddhist vocabulary to express a Manichaean message. On the other hand, Buddhists (as with Christians in the West) often attacked Manichaeans because of this appropriation of the Buddhist terminology. In their critiques the heretical nature of Manichaeism was frequently stressed. 20 Being one of the most widely and wildly persecuted religions in human history, until the twentieth century Manichaeism was known only from the apologetic literature of Christian Church Fathers or the objective descriptions of Theodorus bar K±n… or Ibn al-nad…m. With the discoveries in Turfan and Dunhuang, as well as the egyptian Med…net Mƒd…, scholars have gained a new vista on this extinct religion: for the first time the original voice of Manichaean priests and common believers could be heard. With more finds later on (Cologne Mƒn… Codex, Tebessa Codex, Kellis, Sogdian letters from Bezeklik), we are now in a position to state with certainty that despite the multiple linguistic and conceptual translations, the fundamental parts of the Manichaean system is consistent in all regions, while certain doctrinal, ritual and literary aspects have a local feature. For the most part, though the texts themselves are cached in various languages, the Manichaean cosmogonical and cosmological system constitutes a relatively coherent unity, which, despite the oft-persecuted religion’s fragmentary legacy, can still be reconstructed. As an explanatory metaphor, one can consider the Manichaean cosmological system as a gigantic three-dimensional puzzle, the different layers of which are the various linguistic traditions and the puzzle pieces being the individual Manichaean concepts. Fundamental conSee e.g. Mikkelsen, “Skilfully Planting the Trees of Light,” pp. 102–3. Mikkelsen, “Skilfully Planting the Trees of Light,” pp. 90–93. 20 Fozu tongji T. 49.2035: 370a: “demonic teaching, heretical law” (mojiao xiefa 魔教邪法). Wang Yangde 王延德, who visited Gaochang between 981–984 ad, remarks that “there are also Manichaean temples (at Gaochang), monks from Persia practice their religion there. This is what the Buddhist sutras call a heretical teaching. 復有摩尼寺，波斯僧各持其法。佛經所謂外道者也。” (Songshi 宋史 [Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1977], j. 490, p. 14112). 18 19 9 gábor kósa cepts (such as the Two Principles, Three Periods, Father of Light) appear in almost all transmitted texts, therefore these pieces in the puzzle are present at all levels. Other, more subtle details (such as the names of the five sons of the Living Spirit) are preserved only in certain traditions, therefore these are present only at certain levels (for example, the Sogdian and the Greek lists of these five sons are not complete, therefore there are missing pieces at the Sogdian and the Greek level, but are preserved at the Coptic or Chinese level). Therefore, certain cosmogonical events can be reconstructed on the basis of texts in all the languages of Manichaeism, while others can be gleaned from only two or three sources in certain linguistic traditions. 21 Thus, as far as the basic ideas are concerned, a Coptic source might indeed be a good analogy for a Chinese sentence from the Hymnscroll, even if we cannot always trace the exact path between them. naturally, the closer the analogy, the more secure the explanation is, thus researchers of Manichaeism attempt to recover the philologically secure antecedents of the respective texts. however, in some cases these are simply not available: the vast bulk of Coptic material cannot be interpreted in the light of a similarly great amount of Greek or Syriac source scriptures, thus more remote analogies are required. The model introduced above was primarily designed for written documents, since the fundamental sources for reconstructing the Manichaean cosmogonical and cosmological system are texts written in various languages from Coptic to Chinese, while the single large reservoir of a Manichaean pictorial tradition, the Uyghur Manichaean art from Turfan, has not yielded a comprehensive pictorial representation of the Manichaean system comparable to the “picture” that emerges from the written material. This situation has changed in 2010 with the publication of a recently identified Chinese Manichaean painting, preserved in a Japanese private collection. 22 One of these Chinese Manichaean paintings depicts the entire cosmological system in an astonishingly detailed manner, providing the first, almost complete, pictorial representation of the Manichaean cosmology. It thus adds a second, pictorial, layer to the Chinese “textual” level of the puzzle. no comparable finding has ever surfaced from another cultural tradition, thus presently the only “double (pictorial 21 This is also true of other aspects of Manichaeism: we know from many sources that Mƒn… wrote a large number of letters, but it is only an-nad…m’s al-Fihrist which preserved their titles. 22 Yutaka Yoshida 吉田豊, “Shinshutsu Maniky± kaiga no keijij± 新出マニ教絵画の形而上,” Yamato bunka 大和文華 121 (2010), pp. 1−34. 10 the chinese manichaean sea of fire and textual) level” of the three-dimensional Manichaean puzzle is the Chinese one. Though this painting attests to the sophisticated knowledge that southeastern Chinese Manichaeans might have possessed at a relatively late period (13–15th c.), curiously, no such coherent and detailed knowledge is present in any of the extant Chinese Manichaean writings. Regardless of the possibility that there might have existed Chinese scriptures which contained such information but were lost, at present the only way to decipher the Chinese painting is to make use of the non-Chinese (for example, Parthian or even Coptic) written material, that is, we can fill in the gaps of the Chinese level of the puzzle with pieces from non-Chinese levels. The entire Manichaean system basically revolves around one goal: the rescuing of Light particles imprisoned in the world, itself a mixture of Light and Darkness, and delivering them to their original home, the Realm of Light. Since these two principles are opposed in all aspects, it is natural that Light, being entrapped and “chained” by Darkness, is suffering in the world, the par excellence metaphor of which is the soul (light) suffering in the body (darkness, matter). 23 The sufferings of Light or the Light-Soul in matter (hyl‰ ) is a recurrent topic in various Manichaean hymns, as this is the best symbol of the Manichaean attitude to the world and their eternal longing for the return to the pure land of Light. These sufferings are usually vividly described in a metaphorical language, treated below. From the Coptic Psalm-book to the Chinese Hymnscroll, Manichaean hymns abound with highly sophisticated images, a characteristic that fits in perfectly with Mƒn…’s original intentions. With a book published in 1978, Victoria Arnold-Döben became the first, and so far the only, scholar to attempt to map the fundamental images and symbols used by the Manichaeans. 24 Arnold-Döben’s seminal work demonstrated that Manichaeans not only possessed a coherent set of religious concepts, but they also expressed these concepts with the help of a surprisingly consistent matrix of images (trees, treasure, jewel, merchants, ships, sea, harbors). This metaphorical richness can be possibly attributed to the fundamentally mythological character of the Manichaean system. “As a full-fledged Gnostic system of thought, Manichaeism represented 23 I use “metaphor” in its broad, general sense and do not confine it to the realm of literature, though I analyze religious narratives with an apparent literary dimension. On the great variety of metaphors, see e.g. Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (new York: Cambridge University Press, 2008). 24 Victoria Arnold-Döben, Die Bildersprache des Manichäismus, Arbeitsmaterial zur Religionsgeschichte 3 (Köln: e.J. Brill, 1978). 11 gábor kósa the last significant outburst of mythological thought in the world of antiquity.” 25 Based on a mythologically perceived cosmogonical description, Manichaeism possesses the poetic and symbolic imagery of mythologies. 26 Though Manichaean metaphors often have a regional flavour (a Christian one in the West and a Buddhist one in the east), 27 I greatly rely on Arnold-Döben’s insight that Coptic, Middle Iranian and Chinese Manichaean metaphors share a great amount of elements. 28 On the other hand, the fundamental tenet of the present paper is to show some regional differences that emerge from these shared metaphors. Although it remains a standard work of reference to this day, Arnold-Döben’s book, as one would expect in the case of any work of this kind, has left room for further research: it did not fully exploit the Chinese sources, and, needless to say, it did not cover all the metaphors 25 Sarah Stroumsa and Gedaliahu G. Stroumsa, “Aspects of Anti-Manichaean Polemics in Late Antiquity and under early Islam,” The Harvard Theological Review 81.1 (1988), p. 40. 26 This mythological language abounds with visual metaphors which might be partly traced back to the founder’s fascination with visual imagery. According to the Cologne Mƒn… Codex, the most reliable biography of Mƒn… that we possess, the founder based his religious system on explicitly visual revelations; see 2.2−13.2; 18.1−23.1, Ron Cameron and Arthur J. Dewey, trans., Cologne Mani Codex (P. Colon. inv. nr. 4780): “Concerning the Origin of His Body”, early Christian Literature series 3; Texts and Translations, Society of Biblical Literature 15 (Missoula, Montana: Scholars Press, 1979), pp. 9−15, 18−23. On other sources and on Mƒn…’s Twin as his source of authority, see L.J.R. Ort, Mani: A Religion-Historical Description of His Personality (Leiden: e.J. Brill, 1967), pp. 77−95. The Cologne codex also lists those of Mƒn…’s predecessors who shared with him the feature of receiving some kind of visual revelation (Cologne Mƒn… Codex 48.1−62.1; Cameron and Dewey, Cologne Mani Codex, pp. 36−49). Mƒn… himself stated that he distinguished himself from previous prophets not only by writing down his teachings but also by making a separate work (Eik±n) which visually illustrates his doctrines. (See Jes P. Asmussen, “Ar¥ang,” in Encyclopaedia Iranica Online [vol. 2], 1987, available at www.iranica.com; Lieu, Manichaeism, pp. 175−77; Werner Sundermann, “Was the ²rdhang Mani’s Picture-book?” in Aloïs Van Tongerloo and Luigi Cirillo, eds., Il manicheismo – nuove prospettive della ricercha. Quinto Congresso Internazionale di studi sul manicheismo, Napoli, 2–8 settembre 2001 – Atti (Turnhout: Brepols, 2005), pp. 373–84; Zsuzsanna Gulácsi, “Mani’s “Picture-Box”? A Study of a Chagatai Textual Reference and Its Supposed Pictorial Analogy from the British Library (Or. 8212–1619),” in ibid., pp. 149–66; idem, Mani’s Picture-Book: Searching for a Late Antique Mesopotamian Pictorial Roll and Its Mediaeval Transformation in Central and East Asian Art (Leiden: Brill, forthcoming). Scribes and illustrators were sent along with the Manichaean missionaries to ensure a high quality of translations (reunited fragments M216c and M1750/R; GSR: 205−6; Lieu, Manichaeism, p. 175). Manichaean art, especially book art, was unparalleled in its time and is still observable even in a fragmentary state; hansJoachim Klimkeit, Manichaean Art and Calligraphy (Leiden: e.J. Brill, 1982); Zsuzsanna Gulácsi, Manichaean Art in Berlin Collections; idem, Mediaeval Manichaean Book Art: A Codicological Study of Iranian and Turkic Illuminated Book Fragments from 8th- 11th Century East CE (Leiden: Brill, 2005). The importance of visuality is also noticable in the literary works. 27 Arnold-Döben, Die Bildersprache, p. 5. 28 It should be also stressed that myths and metaphors were probably reality for the Manichaeans, see e.g. In Epictetum Encheiridion (27:71,44–72,15) which states that “they [Manichaeans: G.K.] do not use them [their mythological narratives: G.K.] as myths nor do they think that they have any other meaning but believe that all the things which they say are true (i.e. literal)”; quoted in Jason D. BeDuhn, The Manichaean Body in Discipline and Ritual (Baltimore and London: The Johns hopkins University Press, 2000), p. 265. 12 the chinese manichaean sea of fire used in Manichaean scriptures. The present paper investigates a heretofore unstudied image, the Sea of Fire (huohai 火海). This Chinese image was born from the conceptual matrix which was present in diverse sources, but it seems that it was only in China where it reached a relatively full-fledged form. By collecting materials and parallels relevant to the Sea of Fire, this study perhaps will contribute to further research that may one day constitute an encyclopedic analysis of Manichaean metaphors and images. The eXPReSSIOn “SeA OF FIRe” In The ChIneSe MANICHAICA From a sinological point of view, the expression Sea of Fire is of special interest, since, as will be made clear, it appears foremost in the Chinese Manichaean corpus. We see the phrase altogether six times in the Hymnscroll, four occurrences in the first two hymns addressed to Jesus: “A hymn in eulogy of Jesus” (Zan Yishu wen 讚夷數文, h. 7–44); and “A hymn in eulogy of Jesus, Second Canto” (Zan Yishu wen di’er die 讚夷數文第二疊, h. 45–82). These two hymns are placed at the head of the collection, thus their importance is undeniable. “Sea of Fire” also features once in the Traité, although all previous editions and translations have rendered it mistakenly. 29 h. 19–26. now we sincerely implore and supplicate that we should be removed from the poisoned fire-sea of the body of flesh, its soaring waves are boiling and bubbling ceaselessly, the makaras surface and submerge to swallow (our) vessel. [ h. 20] Originally this is the palace of Mƒra, the country of rƒk™asa, and also the dense forests, the marsh of reeds and rushes, where all the evil wild beasts jostle intermingled with one another, where the poisonous insects and venomous snakes gather. [ h. 21] This is also 29 While the manuscript has “huohai 火海,” all editions give “great sea (dahai 大海)”; see Édouard Chavannes and Paul Pelliot, “Un traité manichéen retrouvé en Chine,” J A, Xe série, 18 (1911), p. 591 [pp. 499–617]; Chen Yuan 陳垣, “Monijiao canjing yi 摩尼教残經一,” in Chen Yuan 陳垣, Chen Yuan xueshu lunwenji 陳垣學術論文集 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1980 [1923]), vol. 1, p. 391; Lin Wushu 林悟殊, Monijiao ji qi dong jian 摩尼教及其東漸 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1987), p. 229; idem, Mo-ni-chiao chi ch’i tung chien 摩尼教及其東漸 — Manichaeism and Its Eastward Expansion, rev. edn. (Taipei: Shushin Books, 1997), p. 282; Gunner B. Mikkelsen, Dictionary of Manichaean Texts in Chinese (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006), p. 12. All translations render “dahai ” accordingly as “dans la vaste mer” (Chavannes and Pelliot, “Un traité,” p. 588), or “in das grosse Meer” (ernst Waldschmidt and Wolfgang Lentz, “Die Stellung Jesu im Manichäismus,” Abhand lungen der königlichen preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 4 [1926], p. 48; helwig Schmidt-Glintzer, ed. and trans., Chinesische Manichaica: Mit textkritischen Anmerkungen und einem Glossar [Wiesbaden: Otto harrassowitz, 1987], p. 103). On the background of this error, see Kósa Gábor, “Correction in the Chinese Manichaean Traité,” Imre Galambos and Imre hamar, eds., Papers from the Budapest Conference on Chinese Manuscripts (working title, Budapest: eLTe University, forthcoming). 13 gábor kósa the body of the Demon(ess) of Greed, and also P‰sˆs [Beisusi] with many forms, the fivefold pit of the land of darkness, and also the lightless courtyards of the five poisons. [ h. 22]. And also the three merciless, poisoned seedlings, and also the five poisonous springs of ruthlessness. 30 … [ h. 25] The armour and the weaponry of all demon-kings, the poisonous net of all opposing teachings, which sinks the precious wares and the merchants, which can cloud the light-buddhas of the Sun and and Moon. [ h. 26] The gates of all hells, the roads of all rebirths, in vain do they agitate against the eternally established nirvƒ¡a king, in the end they will be burnt and imprisoned in the eternal hell.” 31 h. 29. Beneficient and glorious Jesus buddha, raise (your) great compassion and forgive our sins! Listen to these words of suffering and pain, and deliver us from this poisoned sea of fire! 32 h. 32. We wish you would still the huge waves of the sea of fire! Through the curtain of dark clouds and dark mist let the sun of Great Law shine everywhere, that our hearts and soul may be always bright and pure! 33 h. 47. Power in the power of the Unsurpassable honoured of the Lights, King in the wisdom of the unsurpassable sweet dew, who gives cintƒma¡i universally to sentient beings, and leads them out of the deep sea of fire! 34 h. 85. We should resolutely choose and peacefully concentrate on the gate of true teaching, (we must) diligently seek for nirvƒ¡a to cross the sea of fire! 35 30 While the Five Poisoned Springs can be explained by the Manichaean concepts of the Land of Darkness (e.g. M183/I, M39; Jes P. Asmussen, Manichaean Literature: Representative Texts Chiefly from Middle Persian and Parthian Writings, Persian heritage Series 22 [new York: Delmar, 1975], p. 139), in the case of the Three Poisons it is worth recalling the Buddhist notion of sandu 三毒, that is, desire (tan[yu] 貪[欲]), Sk.: rƒga), anger (zhen[hui] 瞋[恚], Sk.: dve™a) and ignorance (yu[chi] 愚[癡], Sk.: moha). This reference is important for the very reason that the “fire of the three poisons” (san du huo 三毒火) appears in Buddhist texts; e.g., Dafangguangfo huayanjing 大方廣佛華嚴經 (T. 10.293: 826b.26−27) mentions it together with the poison of five desires: ([The bodhisattva] “is not burnt by the fire of the three poisons, is not hurt by the poison of the five desires …” 不為一切三毒火燒，五欲毒不中. 31 我今懇切求哀請，願離肉身毒火海。騰波沸涌无暫停，魔竭出入吞舩舫。元是魔宮羅剎國，復是稠林籚葦澤。諸惡禽獸交橫走，蘊集毒虫及蚖蝮。亦是惡業貪魔躰，復是多形卑訴[訢]斯; 亦是暗界五重坑，復是无明五毒院; 亦是无慈三毒苗，復是无惠五毒泉。… 一切魔王之甲仗，一切犯教之毒網，能沈寶物及商人，能翳日月光明佛。一切地獄之門戶，一切輪迴之道路，徒搖常住涅槃王，竟被焚燒囚永獄。 32 廣惠庄嚴夷數佛，起大慈悲捨我罪。聽我如斯苦痛言，引我離斯毒火海。 33 願息火海大波濤! 暗雲暗霧諸繚蓋，降大法日普光輝，令我心性恒明淨。 34 无上明尊力中力，无上甘露智中王! 普施眾生如意寶，接引離斯深火海。 35 決定安心正法門，勤求涅槃超火海。 14 the chinese manichaean sea of fire h. 363. Rescue the light-nature from all perils that it may be able to leave the huge waves of the sea of fire, the whole community wishes that it may be so forever! 36 tr. 338. Using this net of Light, fish for us and save us from the sea of fire, place us in the jewel-boat! 37 The notion of a Sea of Fire was also associated with other Manichaean expressions that, as we will see, were not isolated concepts, but often related by connotation to the Sea of Fire. Thus the Chinese sources quoted above associated the following motifs with it: 1. Body of flesh: h. 19 (roushen 肉身); 2. Poison: h. 19 (du 毒); h. 29 (毒); 3. The Land of Mƒra, the Five Pits: h. 20 (the palace of Demon/ess, or Mogong 魔宮); h. 21 (the body of the Demon/ess of Greed, tanmo ti 貪魔體); h. 21 (the fivefold pit of the Land of Darkness, anjie wu chong keng 暗界五重坑); h. 21 (the five lightless, poisonous courtyards, wuming wu du yuan 无明五毒院); h. 26 (gate to hell, diyu zhi menhu 地獄之門戶); h. 47 (deep, shen 深); 4. Monsters, demons, wild beasts: h. 19 (makara, mojie 魔竭); h. 20 (the country of rƒk™asas, luocha guo 羅剎國); h. 20 (evil wild beasts, zhu e qinshou 諸惡禽獸); h. 20 (poisonous insects, duchong 毒虫; venomous snakes, yuanfu 蚖蝮); h. 21 (P‰sˆs, beisusi 卑訴[訢]斯); 5. Tossing waves: h. 19 (tossing waves boiling and bubbling, tengbo feiyong 騰波沸涌); h. 32, h. 363 (huge waves, da botao 大波濤); 6. Swallowing ships and treasures: h. 19 (swallowing ships, tun chuanfang 吞船舫); h. 25 (sink precious wares and merchants, chen baowu ji shangren 沈寶物及商人); tr. 338 (jewel-boat, baochuan 寶舩); 7. net: h. 25 (poisonous net of opposing teachings, fanjiao zhi duwang 犯教之毒網); tr. 338 (net of Light, mingwang 明網); 8. Rebirth: h. 26 (the roads of rebirth, lunhui zhi daolu 輪迴之道路); 9. Deliverance: h. 19 (leave, li 離); h. 29 (leading out, yin wo li 引我離); h. 32 (soothing, xi 息); tr. 338 (fish for us and save us, laodu 撈渡). From such associations, the Sea of Fire can be seen as fundamentally related to the Realm of Darkness (Land of Mƒra, monsters) and its primal representative in Manichaeism, the human body (body of flesh). It is also closely related to metaphors such as tossing waves, swallowing up of ships, nets, and with religious notions such as rebirth and the desire to be liberated (deliverance). As will become clear, the fire of the sea undoubtedly derives from the notion of the Land of Darkness, and thus refers to a sort of “hellish” fire. 36 37 請救普厄諸明性，得離火海大波濤，合眾究竟願如是! 緣此明網於火海中，撈渡我等，安置寶舩! 15 gábor kósa In what follows I investigate the above nine motifs one by one, and though I naturally stress the importance of the Chinese parallels, following the general tradition of Manichaeism research, I will also survey the non-Chinese analogies, even if they are to be found as far away in time or space as Greek and Coptic sources. I will attempt to map the conceptual matrix of the nine motifs that underlies the Chinese (and Parthian) Manichaean expression “Sea of Fire”. Mapping in this case means to draw a chart of associated metaphors and concepts from the Chinese sources, and simultaneously compare this chart with a similar one from the non-Chinese tradition. I argue that although “Sea of Fire” itself, with the exception of a single Parthian parallel, is not to be found in any other Manichaean text, the majority of the related concepts in the Chinese corpus can be identified in non-Chinese Manichaean writings. As I survey the terms, I clarify the exact meaning of Sea of Fire and demonstrate its partial indebtedness to Buddhist vocabulary. I contend that the imagery pervading the first two hymns of the Chinese Hymnscroll shares many elements with the imagery of the Parthian Angad r±›nƒn, and thus I can conclude that these two hymns of the Chinese Hymnscroll were most probably translated from a rather similar Parthian hymn. COnCePTS ReLATeD TO The SeA OF FIRe In the colophon to the Hymnscroll written, supposedly, by the translator Daoming 道明, it is unambiguously stated that the hymns presented in the collection are translations. h. 417–22. From the 3,000 pieces of the original fan text, I translated more than twenty. Though the texts, the eulogies, the songs and the prayers were originally composed according to the four regions, the translations by Daoming were based entirely on the fan text. 梵本三千之 / 條，所譯二十餘道; 又緣經、讚、唄、願，皆依四 / 處製焉，但道明所翻譯者，一依梵本。 The only problem in interpreting the colophon is that “fan 梵” originally denoted Sanskrit or another type of Indic language, but Sanskrit must be ruled out, since there is no trace of any Manichaean text in Sanskrit. Probably, the use of fan reflects Daoming’s strategy to legitimize the sacred origin of the Manichaean hymns by lending them a past similar to the way in which Buddhist sutras were frequently presented as translations from Sanskrit. We must ask which language does fan specifically refer to? 16 the chinese manichaean sea of fire Since W. B. henning’s discovery, 38 it is common knowledge among Manichaean scholars that one of the Chinese hymns, Tan mingjie wen 歎明界文 (In Praise of the World of Light ; h. 261–338), has a slightly fragmented but available Parthian original (the first canto of the Huyadagmƒn). 39 however, this fact is not conclusive for the question we are pursuing, since this hymn might have had Sogdian or Uyghur versions, presently lost, which might bear even a closer resemblance to the Chinese translation (there are in fact extant Sogdian and Uyghur fragments, though these do not show a greater similarity to the Chinese version than to the Parthian one 40). Moreover, even if Tan mingjie wen had been translated from Parthian, it is not mandatory that all the hymns of the collection were as well, and Daoming could have termed both as “fan,” since we cannot expect a Tang-era translator to have used our notions of a linguistically correct terminological distinction between Parthian and Middle Persian. There is one linguistic clue, however, which suggests that Parthian was the source language of the two Jesus-hymns. The Chinese transcription of P‰sˆs appears in h. 21, and although e. Waldschmidt and W. Lentz assumed that it is the transcription of Sanskrit vihi¿sƒ (“harm,” “harmfulness”), 41 S.n.C. Lieu has correctly identified it with P‰sˆs (a demonic figure). 42 P‰sˆs has only Parthian and Sogdian occurrences, 43 and as we know that the Chinese hymnscroll practically does not contain any Sogdian transcription, 44 it seems safe to assume that P‰sˆs was 38 Walter B. henning, “Annotations to Mr. Tsui’s Translation’, app. to Tsui Chi, ‘Mo ni Chiao hsia Pu Tsan: The Lower (Second?) Section of the Manichaean hymns,’ ” BSOAS XI (1943–46), pp. 216–19. 39 Peter Bryder, The Chinese Transformation of Manichaeism. A Study of Chinese Manichaean Terminology (Löberöd: Plus Ultra, 1985), pp. 63–74; idem, “huyadagmƒn,” in Li Zeng xiang 李增祥, ed., Geng Shimin xiansheng 70 shouchen jinian wenji 耿世民先生70 寿辰纪念文集 (Beijing: Minzu chubanshe, 1999), pp. 252–75. 40 Mikkelsen, “Sukhƒvat… and the Light-world,” p. 207, n. 26. 41 Waldschmidt−Lentz, “Die Stellung Jesu im Manichäismus,” p. 101, n. 3. 42 On this identification, see Samuel n. C. Lieu, “From Parthian into Chinese. The transmission of Manichaean texts in Central Asia,” Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 90.4 (1995), col. 368 [cols. 357−72]. Cf. Mary Boyce, “Sadw‰s and P‰sˆs,” BSOAS 13 (1951), p. 911 [pp. 908–915]: “P‰sˆs has evidently been aggrandized like her mate, and appears not only as the mother of mankind but also as hyle personified.” Also see M741/V/11a: “the sinful, dark P‰sˆs” ( bzkr pysws t’ryg); M741/V/16b: “all demons of wrath, the sons of that P‰sˆs” (h(rw)yn ‘šmg’n z’dg’n cy hw pysws). On these and other occurrences, see Werner Sundermann, “Die Dämonin P‰sˆs,” in Dieter Weber, ed., Languages of Iran: Past and Present: Iranian Studies in Memoriam David Neil MacKenzie (Wiesbaden: harrassowitz, 2005), pp. 210−11 [pp. 207−12]). 43 Ibid. 44 Yoshida Yutaka 吉田豊, “Kanyaku Maniky± bunken ni okeru kanji onsha sareta chˆsei irango ni tsuite 漢訳マニ教文献における漢字音写された中世イラン語について,” Nairiku Ajia gengo no kenkyˆ 內陸アジア言語の研究 2 (1987), pp. 1−15. 17 gábor kósa transcribed from a Parthian original. Consequently, it will be useful to search for further Parthian analogies for these two Chinese hymns. 45 Werner Sundermann expressed a view on Parthian as the source language of Chinese Manichaean scriptures as follows: I would like to submit one general observation I cannot convincingly explain. Most Chinese Manichaean texts which draw on an Iranian pattern or original go back to or were immediately translated from a Parthian original. The Chinese Traité manichéen was, if I am right, translated from a Parthian text. In any case, it comes ultimately from a Parthian version. Two of the three so-called phonetic hymns [in the Hymnscroll: G.K.] are Parthian compositions; only one is Middle Persian. The Chinese hymn In Praise of the World of Light depends on a text composed in Parthian, the first canto of the Huyadagmƒn. … The first Chinese hymn In Praise of the Five Lights draws on the Parthian Sermon on the Soul. Is that by mere coincidence, or did Parthian Manichaean literature play a particular role for the Chinese Manichaean tradition?” 46 Parthian by this time was confined to the ritual sphere; its users, however, were ethnically not Parthians but Sogdians. It is usually acknowledged that Sogdians played a major role in spreading various religions, including Manichaeism, in the areas of the Silk Road. “The Manichaean missionary legations that arrived at Chang’an during the eighth and ninth centuries were mainly teachers and merchants of Sogdian extraction.” 47 It is also generally assumed that while the Sogdian language was a sort of lingua franca on the Silk Road, Sogdian Manichaeans preserved Parthian as a sacred medium. 48 The Hymnscroll, for example, included two Parthian hymns transcribed into Chinese ( h. 154–58, h. 176–83). 49 As mentioned before, 50 Xuanzong’s edict in 732 ad, which forbade the Chinese from practicing Manichaeism, made an exception for the Western hu 西胡 people, presumably identifiable 45 Werner Sundermann, “Iranian Manichaean Texts in Chinese Remake. Translation and Transformation,” in A. Cadonna and L. Lanciotti, eds., Cina e Iran. Da Alessandro Magno alla Dinastia Tang, Orientalia Venetiana 5 (Firenze: Leo S. Olschki editore, 1996), pp. 104, 118 [pp. 103–19]. 46 Sundermann, “Iranian Manichaean Texts,” pp. 117–18. 47 Mikkelsen, “Skilfully Planting the Trees of Light,” p. 89. 48 Walter B. henning, Ein manichäisches Bet- und Beichtbuch (Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften and W. de Gruyter & Co., 1937), p. 14. This may be partly due to the supposed Parthian origin of Mƒn…, and the missionary activity of Mƒr Amm± in the 3rd century. 49 On the phonetically transcribed hymns, see Bryder, Chinese Transformation of Manichaeism, pp. 43–62. Yutaka Yoshida, “Manichaean Aramaic in the Chinese hymnscroll,” B S O A S 46.2 (1983), pp. 326–31. 50 Lieu, Manichaeism, 228–29. 18 the chinese manichaean sea of fire as Sogdians. 51 This would mean that by the first half of the eighth century there were Sogdian Manichaean communities in China. 52 According to the trilingual Karabalgasun inscription, the Uyghur khaghan met four Sogdian Manichaeans in Chang’an, and Sogdians remained influential during the Uyghur Manichaean period, that is, the eighth to tenth centuries. 53 Returning to the original topic, the closest analogy to our nine associated concepts, and more specifically h. 19−26, is the first part of the Parthian Angad r±›nƒn, where the metaphor of being tossed about in the sea is used to describe the sufferings of the light-soul in the material world. In this hymn we also encounter the only exact equivalent of a sea of fire, or fiery sea (zr(y) ’dwryn), as well as another important, though not literal, analogy. Their [demons’, enemies’] fury gathered, like a sea of fire / The seething waves rose up that they might engulf me. 54 It was tossed and troubled as a sea with waves. Pain was heaped on pain, whereby they ravage my soul. / On all sides the anguish reached (me); fire was kindled, and the fog (was full) of smoke. / The wellsprings of Darkness had all been opened. The [giant] fishes transfixed me with fear. 55 In the following nine sections, I analyze the nine motifs associated with the Sea of Fire, see above. The close reading of the texts, which requires ample quotations, is intended to establish hitherto unnoticed parallels between Chinese and non-Chinese Manichaean texts. Ibid., 231–32. On the Sogdians’ presence in China, see Rong Xinjiang, “The Migrations and Settlements of the Sogdians in the northern Dynasties, Sui and Tang,” trans. B. Doar, China Archaeology and Art Digest IV.1. (2000), pp. 117–63. 53 On the Turco-Sogdian milieu, see Étienne de la Vaissière, Sogdian Traders: A History (Leiden: Brill, 2005), pp. 199–225. 54 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 117). Angad r±›nƒn I,19 (MhP: 116): ’wd ’mwšt hwyn dybhr o cw’gwn zr(y) ’dwryn / ’wd pdr’št wrm h’wyndg o kw ’w mn ngwhynd. In locating Middle Iranian texts, I found D. Durkin-Meisterernst’s online text-editions ( http://www.bbaw.de/forschung/ turfanforschung/dta/mirtext/wmirtext.html) extremely useful. When I cite the english translation of a non-Chinese text, first I give the name of the translator and the source of the translation, then the identification of the text, its source and the original text. When I cite from a non-english translation (typically German), I give the identification of the text, the source of the translation and the original text, implying that I translated the German text into english. 55 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 115). Angad r±›nƒn I,13−15 (MhP: 114): ’wd ’(’)šyft ’wd pšyft o / cw’gwn zryh pd wrm / ’wd drd ’mwšt o / kw mn gryw wyg’nynd / ’c hrw ’’rg o / hw ’njwgyf t pryf t / pdyd ’dwr o / ’wd nyzm’n dwdyyn / [’w](d) wyš’d bwd ’hynd o / hrwyn t’r x’nyg / [… … m’]sy’g’n o / pdgryft hym pd trs. 51 52 19 gábor kósa The Body of Flesh h. 19 expressly links Sea of Fire with the body of flesh (see above), and later on, without making it explicit, unfolds this metaphor. 56 In the Chinese Manichaean texts the body of flesh is contrasted with the soul ( tr. 2: benxing 本性; tr. 71, h. 90, h. 406: mingxing 明性), or light-elements ( tr. 29: wu mingxing 五明性) imprisoned in it, 57 which are sometimes depicted in the process of being liberated from the body. 58 The following Chinese citations illustrate the relation of body to the soul. tr. 2. The body of flesh and the original nature [soul]: are they one [the same] or two (different entities)? 59 tr. 188. … similarly to the light-soul which resides in that dark body… 60 tr. 71–72. Thus the great envoy of Wise Light [the Light-nous] with skilful means sifts and rescues the light-nature from this body of flesh, so that it can attain liberation. 61 h. 393–94. If the day of impermanency [death] arrives, we rid ourselves of this abominable body of flesh, all the buddhas, saints and wise surround us everywhere… 62 The Manichaean praxis of “exhausting the body and saving the soul” ( c. 105−6: laoshen jiuxing 勞身救性) refers to the aforementioned liberation — something achieved with the help of ascetic rules. As the Chinese sources attest, the body of flesh has several characteristics: it is poisonous, evil, greedy and lustful ( tr. 23: du’e tanyu 毒惡貪慾), ignorant ( h. 49: wuzhi 无知), and has several additional features: 63 56 On body of flesh (roushen), see e.g. Ma Xiaohe 马小鹤, “Sute wen t’mp’r (roushen) kao 粟特文 t’mp’r (肉身)考,” Faguo hanxue 法國漢學 10 (2005), pp. 478−96, on the Manichaean concept of body see e.g. BeDuhn, The Manichaean Body, pp. 92−125. 57 Chinese Manichaean translations used terms containing xing 性 (“innate nature”) to render Middle Iranian “soul” (gryw), the latter also meaning “self”. In addition to the most commonly used and unmistakebly Manichaean mingxing 明性 (which clearly reflects the luminous nature of the soul), the Buddhist benxing 本性 was also used to convey the same meaning (cf. tr.35−36: guangming benxing 光明本性). Though in the latter case the Manichaeans borrowed the Buddhist expression, naturally it does not mean that benxing 本性 can be equated with soul in a Buddhist context. 58 Cf. De haeresibus 46.15: “he came to free the souls, not the bodies” (venisse ad animas, non ad corpora liberandas). 59 宍身、本性，是一為是二耶 ﹖ 60 … 又如明性處彼暗身 … 61 以是義故，惠明大智[=使]以善方便於此宍身銓救明性，令得解脫。On 智 = 使, cf. Chavannes and Pelliot, “Un traité,” p. 541, n. 3. 62 若至无常之日，脫此可 / 厭肉身，諸佛聖賢，前後圍遶 … 63 The Hymnscroll ( h.104−5) claims that people who consume meat suffer from the hungry fire of greed and lust (tanyin jihuo 貪婬饑火). 20 the chinese manichaean sea of fire tr. 66–68. Thus this body of flesh, which is also called the Old Man, is nothing but bone, sinew, vein, flesh, skin, hatred, fury, lust, anger, ignorance and greed, gluttony, lust. These thirteen together constitute the body, and thus resemble the lightless realm without beginning. 64 The creator and ruler of the body of flesh is the Demon(ess) of Greed 65 ( h. 94: roushen tanmo zhu 肉身貪魔主), thus it is not surprising to see the finite body paralleled with an infinite number of demons of a poisonous nature ( tr. 112–13). As the Demon(ess) has concealed herself in the human body ( h. 90), at the time of death not only does the soul leave the body, but the Demoness also emerges from her hiding-place. Thus, “When the body of flesh perishes, the Demon(ess) comes out” ( 肉身破壞，魔即出; h. 95). Also, h. 23 claims that “all male and female demons emerge from the body of flesh” ( 一切魔男及魔女，皆從肉身生緣現). The concept that the body inherently belongs to the Land of Darkness is also attested in various non-Chinese sources, as in the following quotations. It shows us that the Chinese sources are faithfully preserving a general Manichaean association. Because (Mƒn…) claims that God created the universe from these two (principles), the man’s body deriving from the evil, but his soul from the Good. 66 And if this body which clothes us possesses the same nature as Darkness, as they [the Manichaeans: G.K.] assert, and this soul which is in us possesses the same nature as Light… 67 The allotment of light is the soul in men, while that of darkness is their body and their material construction. 68 64 如此宍身，亦名故人，即是骨、筋、脈、宍、皮、怨、嗔、婬、怒、癡及貪、饞、婬，如是十三共成一身，以像无始无明境界。 65 As tanmo 貪魔 is evidently identical with ²z (see Jes P. Asmussen, “²z,” in Encyclopaedia Iranica Online [vol. 2.], 1987, available at www.iranica.com), I use Demoness to express her female character, though the Chinese word does not imply this aspect. 66 Titus Bostrensis: Contra Manichaeos 17. nils-Arne Pedersen, Demonstrative Proof in Defence of God. A Study of Titus of Bostra’s Contra Manichaeos – The Work’s Sources, Aims and Relation to Its Contemporary Theology (Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2004), p. 435: ἐξ ἀμφοῖν μὲν γὰρ τούτοιν φησὶ θεὸν δημιουργῆσαι τόδε τὸ πᾶν, τοῦ δὲ ἀνθρώπου εἶναι μὲν τὸ σῶμα τῆς κακίας, εἶναι δὲ τὴν ψυχὴν τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ. 67 Prose Refutations of Ephrem 80.42–48; trans. J.C. Reeves, “Manichaean Citations from the Prose Refutations of ephrem,” in Paul Mirecki and Jason BeDuhn, eds., Emerging from Darkness. Studies in the Recovery of Manichaean Sources [Leiden, new York, Köln: Brill, 1997], p. 253 [pp. 217–88]. 68 Trans. M. Vermes; Vermes, trans., and Samuel n.C. Lieu, intro. and comm., Hegemonius: Acta Archelai. (The Acts of Archelaus) (Turnhout: Brepols, 2001), p. 45. Acta Archelai VII.1–2 (Charles henry Beeson, ed., Hegemonius, Acta Archelai [GCS 16] [Leipzig: J.C. hein- 21 gábor kósa “The body is inherently sinful, derived from the evil nature” … the soul, as they say, “derived from a chaste root.” 69 They say: the root of all body is Darkness… 70 The body which belongs to evil from its nature. 71 The Manichaeans say: “We wear the body of Satan, but the soul belongs to God. … Because the soul is good, and the body is evil.” 72 They say that their bodies derive from the clan of Darkness. 73 (The Manichaeans) claim that “the body is evil, and the soul is from good.” 74 “…the demonic ²z who built this body…” 75 Yielding to the desires of the body (especially gluttony, the most conspicuous one) is to be avoided by the elect, the Manichaean priests or “chosen ones”, since these desires originate from Darkness. The strict ascetic rules observed by the Manichaean elect are in fact part of a struggle against the human body and its desires, and ultimately a struggle against Darkness, their originator. tr. 168. Its [one of the “dark trees”] colour is to be passionately fond of the hundred flavours of drink and food, thus benefitting their body of flesh. 76 richs, 1906] p. 9): καὶ τοῦ μὲν φωτὸς εἶναι μέρος τὴν ἐν ἀνθρώποις ψυχήν, τοῦ δὲ σκότους τὸ σῶμα καὶ τὸ τῆς ὕλης δημιούργημα [et lucis quidem esse partem animam quae in hominibus est, tenebrarum autem corpus et quae ex materia est conditio]. 69 Prose Refutations of Ephrem 86.7−13; trans. Reeves, “Manichaean Citations,” p. 251. 70 Hymni contra haereses 17.3 (edmund Beck, Ephräms Polemik gegen Mani und die Manichäer – im Rahmen der zeitgenössischen griechischen Polemik und der des Augustinus [Louvain: Secrétariat du Corpus SCO, 1978], p. 35). 71 Prose Refutations of Ephrem 147.19. (Beck, Ephräms Polemik, p. 45). 72 Serapion Thmuitanus: Adversus Manichaeos 12 (Alfred Adam, ed., Texte zum Manichäismus, Kleine Texte für Vorlesungen und Übungen 175 [Berlin: Walter de Gruyter et Co., 1954; 2nd edn.], p. 59): φασὶ γὰρ Μανιχαῖοι: τὸ σῶμα ἐφορέσαμεν τοῦ Σατανᾶ, ἡ δὲ ψυχὴ τοῦ θεοῦ. [...] ἀγαθὴ οὖν ἡ ψυχή, πονηρὸν δὲ τὸ σῶμα. 73 De natura boni 45: ...et carnes suas de gente tenebrarum esse dicunt. 74 Severianus of Gabala: In Centurionem 15 (Michel Aubineau, Un traité inédit de Christologie de Sévérien de Gabala in Centurionem et Contra Manichaeos et Apollinaristas. Exploitation par Sévère d’Antioche ( 519) et le synode du Latran ( 649), Cahiers d’Orientalisme V [Genève: Patrick Cramer, 1983], p. 122): τῶν τὴν σάρκα πονηρὰν ὁριζομένων, τὴν δὲ ψυχὴν ἐκ τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ. Also see M 9 II (Mary Boyce, A Reader in Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian. Texts with Notes, Acta Iranica 3. sér., II, 9; Textes and mémoires [Téhéran–Liège: Bibliothèque Pahlavi; Leiden: e.J. Brill, 1975]; hereafter, RMMP: ae), pp. 89–90; De haeresibus 46.19. 75 M801a 42/18−43/1 (henning, Ein manichäisches Bet- und Beichtbuch, p. 38, line 665−66): δywδ’t ’’z kyy mwnw tmb’r ptys’c… . See also Werner Sundermann, Mittelpers ische und parthische kosmogonische und Parabeltexte der Manichäer mit einigen Bemerkungen zu Motiven der Parabeltexte von Friedmar Geissler, Berliner Turfantexte IV (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1973), pp. 26−31. 76 色是貪嗜百味飲食，資益宍身。 22 the chinese manichaean sea of fire tr. 305–6. The third [characteristic of the elect: G.K.] is that whenever he walks or stays, sits or lies, he does not favor his body of flesh by seeking all kinds of fine and comfortable robes, bedding, drink and food, soups and potions, elephants and horses, and carriages to glorify his body. 77 “Body of flesh” (Chin.: roushen 肉身; Parth.: tnb’r; Sogd.: tmb’r, tanb’r; 78 and Uygh.: ät’öz), 79 is explicitly called “infernal” (tmy t’mp’r) in a Sogdian letter. 80 In the Manichaean sysem, the body is thus associated with Darkness and its attributes. Furthermore, similarly to the Chinese sources, other Manichaean texts also link this carnal body to the motif of ocean or fire, as evidenced by the following excerpts. And this body, that is upon you; consider (it) thus. It has been entirely made and created by tricks and deceit. Deep within it, many are the powers, the ideas, the intentions, the thoughts which are (all) bubbling and stirring. Thus is (its) mien, like the ocean Samudra (in) which the disturbances are many. 81 The fire that dwells in the body, its affairs are drinking / and eating, but the soul thirsts always for the Word of God. 82 … together with the fire and [the lu]st [that] dwell in men and 三者若行，若住，若坐，若臥，不寵宍身，求諸細滑衣服臥具，飲食湯藥，象馬車乘，以榮其身。 e.g. M131/I/79 (henning, Ein manichäisches Bet- und Beichtbuch, p. 45); M801a/43/1 (ibid., p. 38); cf. Mikkelsen, “Skilfully Planting the Trees of Light”, p. 102. 79 Chavannes and Pelliot, “Un traité,” p. 508. n. 2. See e.g. T II D 173c (Albert von Le Coq, Türkische Manichaica aus Chotscho. III [Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1922], p. 12). 80 81TB65:2/30. Yoshida Yutaka 吉田豊, “Sute wen kaoshi 粟特文考釋,” in Liu hong liang 柳洪亮, ed., Tulufan xinchu Monijiao wenxian yanjiu 吐鲁番新出摩尼教文献研究. Studies in the New Manichaean Texts Recovered from Turfan (Xinjiang Tulufan diqu wenwuju, 2000), pp. 3−199, p. 90. The same expression appears as tmyh tmb’r in M372 R I 3 (Yoshida, “Sute wen kaoshi,” p. 104). 81 Trans. A. Van Tongerloo (“Light, More Light,” in Aloïs Van Tongerloo and Søren Giversen, eds., Manichaica Selecta. Studies Presented to Prof. J. Ries on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday, Manichaean Studies 1 [Lovanii: International Association of Manichaean Studies and Center of the history of Religions, BCMS Louvain, 1991]), p. 377 [pp. 371−78]). TM 298 (Le Coq, Türkische Manichaica, p. 9; Tongerloo, “Light, More Light,” p. 377; see also hans-Joachim Klimkeit, “Jesus’ entry into Parinirvana: Manichaean Identity in Buddhist Central Asia,” Numen 33.2 (1986), p. 226 [pp. 225–40]; hans-Joachim Klimkeit, “The Fair Form, the hideous Form and the Transformed Form: On the Form Principle in Manichaeism,” in Manfred heuser and hans-Joachim Klimkeit, Studies in Manichaean Literature and Art, nag hammadi and Manichaean Studies 46 (Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill, 1998), p. 163 [pp. 142–72]): ymä bu ätöz / kim sizni üzä turur inčä körüŋ / qolulaŋ tolup barča t(ä)vän / körün armaγan azγurmaqan / itmiš y(a)ratmïš ol ičtin sïŋar öküš / ärürlär küčlüglär köŋül(l)är biliglär / saqïnčlar kim čoqrayurlar qamšayurlar / ančola mäŋ(i)zligg ärürlär qaltï / uluγ taluy s(a)mutrï kim bulγaq t[älgük] / öküš ol. This parallel has already been mentioned by Waldschmidt−Lentz (“Die Stellung Jesu im Manichäismus,” p. 11). 82 Psalm-Book 40,29−30: ts[et]e etouhx xNpswma pSxwb Ntas pe ouwm / á x [is]w. t2uyh xws esabe Mpseje Mpnoute Nneu nim. On the fire of eating and drinking see Psalm-Book 55,28. 77 78 23 gábor kósa women, inflaming [them] inward to one another. 83 And [she [²z: G.K.] placed] greed and lust in [the middle [of the body: G.K.]], imitatin[g the Call and the] Answer [and raging fire was the same as the Column of Glory]. 84 And who jailed you [god of Light: G.K.] in this dark prison, this incarceration, this place of no refuge, which constitutes this body of flesh? … And who made you a servant of his shameless, dark, unquenchable, vile fire? 85 We can thus conclude that both the Chinese and the non-Chinese sources basically associate the human body with Darkness, and also link the human body to the motif of fire and/or ocean. Poison In two cases, the Hymnscroll ( h. 19, h. 29) designates the Sea of Fire as poisonous (du). In the Chinese sources its poisonous nature is closely linked again with the Land of Darkness: the Demoness of Greed and the demons possess a poisonous heart and nature ( tr. 21, tr. 29: du xin 毒心; tr. 113: du xing 毒性), and poisonous, evil thoughts ( tr. 68: du’e siwei 毒惡思惟); demons derive from the poisonous race ( h. 191: hei’an du lei 黑暗毒類), and burn with a chaotic, poisonous flame ( h. 193: zadu yan 雜毒焰). In the human body they plant poisonous trees of death ( tr. 35: wu du si shu 五毒死樹; h. 69: wu du shu 五毒樹), which produce poisonous fruits ( tr. 36: du guo 毒菓). During the process of salvation, the envoy of Light binds the poisonous snakes and wild beasts ( tr. 53−54: zhong dushe ji zhu e’shou 眾毒蛇及諸惡獸) and fells the poisonous trees (of death) ( tr. 55: zhanfa dushu 斬伐毒樹; tr. 157−158: faque wu zhong du’e sishu 伐卻五種毒惡死樹), overturns the dark earth of the poisonous, evil, dark greed and lust ( tr. 152: fan du’e tanyu andi 翻毒惡貪慾暗地). The already quoted description of Mƒra’s palace abounds with the term “poison”, as does that of the two dark nights 86: 83 Kephalaia 26,15−17: tsete mN [txhdo]/nh [et]ouhx xn Nxaut mN nsxiame eslwb¥ M[mau] / axoun anouerhu. 84 M240/R/5−6 (Werner Sundermann, Der Sermon vom Licht-Nous. Eine Lehrschrift des östlichen Manichäismus. Edition der parthischen und soghdischen Version [Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1992], pp. 62−63): ’wd ](’)’z ’wd ’wrjwg (p)[d *mdy’n nš’st] / [pd xrwštg u] (pdw’)xtg (n)[yš’n… (Using an analogy from another fragment, the last part [“and raging fire was the same as the Column of Glory”] was inserted by Sundermann.) 85 Trans. h.-J. Klimkeit (GSR: 149−150, slightly modified). M131/I/73−79, 91−95 (henning, Ein manichäisches Bet- und Beichtbuch, pp. 44−45): ky βynd ’tyh kyy / prkštδrt prymynd / prm t’rc βndktyc / prw nwptfr’wn cykt / pr pw’nwt ° kyy ’ty / xwty ‘ycy x’ y’tny / tmb’r (…) ’rtf kyy / kwn’ ’sp’syh / wynyy rwrt tmyq / ’’tr xwrndyy wynyy / pw ’mb’r nwβznyy… 86 In the al-Fihrist (Gustav Flügel, Mani, seine Lehre und seine Schriften. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Manichäsmus. Aus dem Fihrist des Abû’l-faradsch Mu¹ammad ben Is¹a ķ al- 24 the chinese manichaean sea of fire h. 20. Originally this is the palace of Mƒra, the country of rƒk™asa, and also the dense forests, the marsh of reeds and rushes, where all the evil wild beasts jostle intermingled with one another, where the poisonous insects and venomous snakes gather. h. 21. This is also the body of the Demon(ess) of Greed, and also P‰sˆs with many forms, the fivefold pit of the land of darkness, and also the lightless courtyards of the five poisons. h. 22. And also the three merciless, poisoned seedlings, and also the five poisonous springs of ruthlessness. … h. 24. The dark mother of all the demon-kings, the source of all evil deeds, and also the heart of the fierce and poisonous yak™as, 87 and also the reflection in the thoughts of the Demon(ess) of Greed. h. 25. The armour and the weaponry of all demon-kings, the poisonous net of all opposing teachings, which sinks the precious wares and the merchants, which can cloud the light-buddhas of the Sun and the Moon. 88 tr. 213–17. Moreover, next there are the two types of dark nights. As for the first night, it is the Demon(ess) of Greed, her twelve hours are bone, sinew, veins, flesh and skin, and also hatred, fury, lust, anger, ignorance, greed, hungry fire, these ones are the impure poisons, thus they resemble the Land of Darkness that is without beginning and without light, the first dark night. The second dark night is the wild, poisonous desire which is flaming and blazing; the twelve hours are the twelve dark and poisoned thoughts. This dark night resembles the sign of the primeval rise of the demons. 89 Warrâ ķ , bekannt unter dem Namen Ibn Abî Ja‘ ķ ûb an-Nadîm [Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag/Leipzig, 1862/1969], p. 86; Bayard Dodge, The Fihrist of al-Nadim. A Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture, Records of Civilization; Sources and Studies 83 [new York: Columbia Press, 1970] 2, p. 777) one of the elements of the Land of Darkness is poison (as-samm), though the majority of the sources (De moribus Manichaeorum 9,14; Liber Scholiorum [A. V. Williams Jackson and Abraham Johannan, “Theodore bar Khoni on Mƒn…’s Teachings, Translated from the Syriac with notes,” in A.V. Williams Jackson, Researches in Manichaeism. With Special Reference to the Turfan Fragments (2nd edn., new York: AMS Press InC, 1932/1965)], pp. 223–24 [pp. 219–54]; De haeresibus 46.7; Contra Epistulam Fundamenti 31,34; Kephalaia 48,6–9) do not list it among the five dark elements (Georges Vajda, “Le témoignage d’al-Mƒtur…d… sur la doctrine des Manichéens, des Day™ƒnites et des Marcionites,” Arabica 13 [1966], p. 16 [pp. 1–38, 113– 28]). On poison, see also A. V. Williams Jackson, “The Manichaean Cosmological Fragment M. 98–99 in Turfan Pahlavi,” in Jackson, Researches in Manichaeism, p. 68 [pp. 22–73]. 87 Yakṣa (yecha 夜叉) was probably already included in the Parthian original (cf. M7 II V ii 22: e.g. yxš’n [Waldschmidt–Lentz, “Die Stellung Jesu im Manichäismus,” p. 10]; also see M1202; Desmond Durkin-Meisterernst, Dictionary of Manichaean Texts. Vol. III. 1. Dictionary of Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian [Turnhout: Brepols, 2004], p. 375). 88 元是魔宮羅剎國，復是稠林籚葦澤。諸惡禽獸交橫走，蘊集毒虫及蚖蝮。亦是惡業貪魔躰，復是多形卑訢[=訴]斯; 亦是暗界五重坑，復是无明五毒院; 亦是无慈三毒苗，復是无惠五毒泉。… 一切魔王之暗母，一切惡業之根源，又是猛毒夜叉心，復是貪魔意中念。一切魔王之甲仗，一切犯教之毒網，能沈寶物及商人，能翳日月光明佛。 89 其次復有兩種暗夜。第一夜者，即是貪魔; 其十二時者，即是骨、筋、脈、宍、皮等，及以怨 25 gábor kósa Several non-Chinese sources also testify that poison is a typical characteristic of the Land of Darkness, the sa¿sƒra and more specifically the human body: And that ²z and Ahriman, darkness and gloom, evil-smelling hot wind and the poison of death, the wrathful burning and the poison of the demons. 90 In [the existence] of a mad, savage, poisonous animal, ceaselessly like this, being submerged in the dust of forgetfulness of rebirths. 91 …as I have been born in this terrible, phantasmic house, this castle of death, this poisonous form, the body made of bone… 92 In connection with the Sea of Fire, h. 22 mentions the Five Poisonous Springs (wu du quan 五毒泉), which can be explained by the notion of Five Dark Pits, a primeval attribute of the Land of Darkness. The motif of (poisonous) springs of Darkness also makes an appearance in non-Chinese texts: The wellsprings of Darkness had all been opened. The [giant] fishes transfixed me with fear. 93 Poisonous springs gush from him, and from him are breathed out [smoky] fogs… 94 he has flung much poison and wickedness from that deep …95 This lying body of death is a nameless poison. The Old Man is a nameless poison. Just like the flood which damages the tender sowing, just like the fire. 96 憎、嗔恚、婬慾、忿怒、愚癡、貪欲、飢火，如是等輩，不淨諸毒，以像暗界无始无明第一暗夜。第二夜者，即是猛毒慾熾焰; 十二時者，即是十二暗毒思惟。如是暗夜，以像諸魔初興記驗。 90 Trans. h.-J. Klimkeit (GSR: 230). M7980/I/V/ii/8−14 (RMMP: y, pp. 67–68): ’wd h’n ’ ’z w ’hrmn / ’wd t’r ’wd t m / ’wd hwš’g ‘y / dwjgn ’wd zhr ‘y / mrg ’wd swcyšn / ‘y xyšmyn °° ’wd / zhr ‘y dyw’n… 91 Trans. Larry V. Clark, “The Manichean Turkic Pothi-Book,” Altorientalische Forschungen 9 (1982), p. 181/lines 26−27 [pp. 145−218]. T III D 260 (Clark, ibid., p. 168/lines 26−27): [mun]qul qal aquluγ yılqıta. Tutčıı üsüksüz monıteg [.] tuqumuγ a[žun-] / -uγ unıtmaqlıγ. tooz topraqqa patılıp. Cf. W. Bang and A. von Gabain, Türkische Turfan-Texte. III. Der grosse Hymnus auf Mani (Berlin: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften, W. de Gruyter & Co., 1930), pp. 186−87. 92 Trans. h.-J. Klimkeit (GSR: 149). M395/34−38 (henning, Ein manichäisches Bet- und Beichtbuch, p. 43): … cw prymyδ sym xwtšy mrcyny ptrwp j’rnyy yδw ’stk’njl tmb’r ’’jtym. 93 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 115). Angad r±›nƒn I,15 (MhP: 114): [’w](d) wyš’d bwd ’hynd o hrwyn t’r x’nyg / [......m’]sy’g’n o pdgryft hym pd trs. 94 Trans. Mary Boyce, “Some Parthian Abecedarian hymns,” BSOAS 14 (1952), pp. 435–50 (hereafter cited as SPAh), p. 442. M507/R/5 (SPAh, p. 441; RMMP: am, p. 97): jhryn x’ns’r ‘zdm[y](n)d ’c hw oo ’wd dmyn[d] ’c hw nyzm[’n dwdyn]. 95 Trans. Boyce (SPAh, p. 442). M507/V/15 (SPAh, p. 441; RMMP: am, p. 97): pwr ’(š)yxt jhr ’wd b[z](g)yft oo ’(c hw) jfr’n / ’br .... 96 M284b/R/ii/10−19. (Christiane Reck, ed., Gesegnet sei dieser Tag. Manichäische Festtags- 26 the chinese manichaean sea of fire …the poison stinging scorpions, … with their floods of death. 97 At this point it is also worth citing some non-Chinese analogies for the paradoxical compound of fiery springs and fountains. In these excerpts fire and water appear together as attributes of the Land of Darkness. Lo, the Darkness I have subdued, lo, the fire of the fountains [I have / extinguished] it… 98 For I have removed myself from the bitter / … and come to port before the sea became stormy. / The … salt sea, I was not washed [in it / ever, nor did I [receive the] slavery of / the fire of insatiety before my eyes (?) 99 They knew not the Church, they fell into the fire, they did not / understand. Let no man [add toil to us: G.K.]. / The desire [is] the Flood; the eye of malice / is the fire. 100 he [Living Spirit: G.K.] closed the fountains of / fire that they might not again send up darkness, he / quenched the furnaces of fire… 101 Water and springs in the Realm of Light are naturally precisely the opposite of the descriptions above: they are fragrant and marvellous, as they contain the water of life. h. 290. The hundred creeks, the rivers and the sea, the water springs, the water of life in their depth is fragrant and wondrous, if (someone) enters them, he does not drift, nor does he drown, there are no tides which would cause any harm. 102 hymnen. Edition der mittelpersischen und parthischen Sonntag-, Montags- und Bema hymnen [Turnhout: Brepols, 2004], pp. 113−14): jhr ’st / ’n’myg ‘ym / nys’w drwjn oo / jhr ’st ’n’myg / ‘ym kfwn mrdwhm / oo h’mgwng cw’gwn / hynw’r ky n’syd / ’w nswg kyšf’n / h’mgwng cw’gwn / ’dwr. 97 Trans. I. Gardner. P. Kell. Copt. 2/37−38 (Gardner, Kellis Literary Texts, p. 64): [ ]xe anouoxe Nbakmet’’`oue / [ ]m xN neukataklusmos Nte pmou. 98 Psalm-Book 55,6−7: eis] pkeke aïcBïaf eis tsete NNxalm[e aiw¥/me] Mmas … 99 Psalm-Book 99,12−16: je e aïsext Nn[. . . . . / . . e]tsa¥e aïmane empate piam bi x[aime / . . .] . s Ncalassa etmalX Mpiji jwkm[e nxhts / an]hxe oute tsete NtmNtatsi Mpiji tes/mn]tqaouan xaïet. 100 Psalm-Book 171,18−21: MpousNouwn tekklhsia auxeïe atsete emp[ou/Mme . Mpwrt . / pkataklusmos tepicumia tsete pbel NtmN/tbanïeire. 101 Psalm-Book 212,19−21: aftwm Nxalme N/tsete : je nouswt atNnau keke axrhï : a[f/w¥M Nkam[inos N/t]sete… 102 百川河海及泉源，命水湛然皆香妙，若入不漂及不溺，亦無暴水來損耗。 27 gábor kósa The Land of Mƒra and the Five Pits In the Chinese scriptures, the motif of the sea (of fire) is linked to the Land of Darkness and — in the Chinese, Buddhism-inspired terminology — Mƒra (Mo 魔), its lord: 103 the Hymnscroll mentions Mƒra’s palace, Mƒra’s body, the gate of hell, and the five lightless, poisonous courtyards (again, see number 3 of the motifs listed above). The association between the sea and the Land of Darkness also appears in non-Chinese sources: [The First Man, who is in the Darkness] his ship is his four sons who are swathed over his body. The sea is the la[nd of darkness … / …] his net is […] and his powers. 104 [The sea is] [the] error of the universe, the law o[f sin]… 105 …and the deadly pool of hell 106 The sea motif in these texts is always connected to the Land of Darkness, just like the motif of depth (shen) and the fivefold pit (wuchong keng). It is to be noted that the first significant events of the Manichaean cosmogony (the attack of Darkness, the descent and suffering of the First Man, and his being led up from the pit of darkness by the Mother of Life and the Living Spirit) serve both as an archetype of and, at the same time, an explanation for the suffering and deliverance of the soul/ light (actually the sons/weapons of the First Man). tr. 8–10. You must know that before this universe came into being, the two envoys of Light, the Pure Wind and the Benign Mother entered the dark pit of the Lightless Land, in order to pull out the valiant, ever-victorious (Primeval Thought, who wore) the armor of great wisdom, the five kinds of light-body; they took him and ascended, they led him out from the five pits. 107 103 Generally see Paul van Lindt, The Names of Manichaean Mythological Figures: A Comparative Study on Terminology in the Coptic Sources, Studies in Oriental Religions 26 (Wiesbaden: Otto harrassowitz, 1992), pp. 198−210; hanns-Peter Schmidt, “Vom awestlischen Dämon ²zi zur manichäischen ²z, der Mutter aller Dämonen,” in Ronald e. emmerick, Werner Sundermann, and Peter Zieme, eds., Studia Manichaica. IV. Internationaler Kongress zum Manichäismus, Berlin, 14.–18. Juli 1997 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2000), pp. 517–27; Werner Sundermann, “The Zoroastrian and the Manichaean Demon ²z,” in Siamak Adhami, ed., Paitimƒna. Essays in Iranian, Indo-European, and Indian Studies in Honor of Hanns-Peter Schmidt (Costa Mesa, Calif.: Mazda Publisher, Inc., 2003) 2, pp. 328−38; Rui Chuanming 芮传明, “Monijiao hylè, ²z, Tan Mo kao 摩尼教 hylè、²z、贪魔考,” Shilin 史林 (2006.5), pp. 88−99. 104 Kephalaia 28,12−15: pefjai pe pefftau [n]¥hre etqale a/jm pefswma calassa pe pka[x Mpkeke … / … pef¥ne p[e … / mn nefqam. 105 Kephalaia 28,30−31: [t]planh mpkosmos pnomos Nt[e mnabe … 106 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 97). Huyadagmƒn Va,7b (MhP: 96): ’wt n(r)[h] ’hrywwr. An interesting “personal experience” of Mƒn… is described in the Cologne Mƒn… Codex (77,4−79,12), where in a vision Mƒn… sees Sita drowning in the water of darkness. 107 汝等當知，即此世界未立以前，淨風、善母二光明使入於暗坑无明境界，拔擢驍健、常 28 the chinese manichaean sea of fire tr. 145–47. Relying on this column, the seeds of truth can get out from the five kinds of lightless, dark pits. This resembles the function of the five-five sons of the Primeval Thought and the Pure Wind as supporting columns for the five light bodies in the macroscosm. 108 The fivefold pit ( h. 21, tr. 145−46) or the five pits ( tr. 10: wu keng 五坑) appear both in the Hymnscroll and the Traité. These five pits are evidently the same as the five worlds/pits of the Land of Darkness referred to in other sources (Syriac: câlmâ; Parth.: ’hrywr; Copt.: (p+ou) nkosmos, tameia; Gk: κόσμοι, ἄντρα; Lat.: antra). 109 In his Enchiridion Epicteti, Simplicius designates the Darkness as “five-formed” (πενταμόρφος). 110 The following quotations attest to the presence of this notion in diverse non-Chinese sources. The quarrelsome Prince of Darkness has subdued those five pits of destruction, through great …(?) terror and wrath. 111 But the Kingdom of Darkness consists of five store-/ houses... 112 ...the five abysses of the Dark. 113 ... in the five trees that are in the five [worlds of] the land of darkness. 114 (The Living Spirit) “in order to create that great structure, the new Paradise, over it, he filled the five ditches of death and levelled (them). 115 勝 □□□□ 大智甲五分明身，策持昇進，令出五坑。 108 真實種子，依因此柱得出五重无明暗坑。猶如大界先意、淨風各有五子，与五明身作依止柱。 109 Jackson, “The Manichaean Cosmological Fragment,” pp. 48–49. n. 35. Cf. De moribus Manichaeorum 9,14; Contra Epistulam Fundamenti 28,1; In Enchiridion Epicteti 71. 110 In Enchiridion Epicteti 71,21 (Samuel n. C. Lieu, “Manichaeism in early Byzantium: Some Observations,” in Luigi Cirillo and Aloïs Van Tongerloo, eds., Atti del terzo congresso internazionale di studi “Manicheismo e Oriente Cristiano Antico”, Arcavata di Rende – Amantea, 31 agosto – 5 settembre 1993, Manichaean Studies 3 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997), pp. 226–27 [pp. 217–34]). The Five Pits are closely associated with the five dark elements, which are the opposites of the five light elements (De moribus Manichaeorum 9,14; Liber Scholiorum [Jackson and Johannan, “Theodore bar Khoni,” pp. 223–24]; De haeresibus 46.7: Contra Epistulam Fundamenti 31,34: Kephalaia 48,6–9: Kephalaia 68,17). 111 Trans. M. Boyce (SPAh, p. 442). M507/V/14 (SPAh, p. 441, RMMP: am, p. 97): ‘styh’g ’xšynd t’ryg oo nydrxt ’w hwyn / pnǰ ’hrywr oo pd wzrg ’m’n trs ’wd dybhr. 112 Psalm-Book 9,17–18: tmNtRro xws Mpkeke es¥oop xN+ou Nta/mion... 113 Psalm-Book 10,9: p+ou Nnoun Mpkeke... 114 Kephalaia 48,15–16: xm p+ou p¥hn etxn p+ou [Nkosmos Nte] / pkax Mpkeke. 115 GSR: 226. M98/I/V/5−8 (RMMP: y, p. 61; cf. Jackson, “The Manichaean Cosmological Fragment,” p. 32): ’wd r’z ‘y / wzrg, whyšt ‘y nwg ’br ’pwrydn / r’y o h’n pnz knd’r ‘y mrg hngnd / ’wd h’mgyn qyrd. 29 gábor kósa These Five Pits belong to the original state of the Land of Darkness, and are not to be confused with the Three Ditches, which were created during the cosmogonical process, although the qualities stored in them are quite similar to the ones treated here (water, darkness, fire). The reason for this is that Three Ditches store the elements of Darkness removed from the world by the Three Vessels. In the following I quote non-Chinese sources to illustrate the motif of three dark ditches. And the waste and the accretion of the Three Vessels, they of [water and of] darkness [and] of fire, which had been discharged upon (the earth), he gathered them and [and deposited them in the] sea that is within the walls and the vessels; because of this sea waters are salty. For they have received salt and bitterness from the washing out and cleansing of the three vessels. 116 And all around the same earth, he made four walls and three ditches. And he imprisoned the demons in those three inner ditches.117 The first is the ditch of water, the second is that of darkness, and the third is fiery... 118 Those three poisonous dark ditches and the conflagrations...119 The qualities deposited in the Three Ditches are good analogies, because they exhibit the unmixed forms of the dark principle. On the other hand, the hymns on the sufferings of the soul cannot be connected with the notion of Three Ditches, as light is not present there in any form. It should be also emphasized that during the cosmogonical process the Living Spirit, in order to create the eight earths, 120 seems to abolish the Five Pits, though this cosmogonical event was probably unknown to the Chinese Manichaean community. But even if it had been well-known, this presumably would not have prevented them from using the metaphor of dark pits and sea to express the sufferings of the soul tormented by the Darkness. 116 Kephalaia 113,35−114,3: psarme de mn pouwxme Mp¥amt Mmanjiore pap/[mau pap]keke [mn] patsete etau¥ouwu ajwf afsauxou / … calassa et¥oop xixoun NsBteue / mN Mmanjiore etbe peï Mmouïeue Ncalassa malx / epeidh auji oumlax mN ousi¥e xitM piwe abal Mpka/carismos Mp¥amt Mmanjioore. Later on in the text there is another reference to it (Kephalaia 114,7−114,9): “And t[ha]t waste, the sediment of the washing out of the wheel, he cast it down and mixed it with the sea water”. 117 GSR: 226. M 99/I/R/13−17 (RMMP: y, p. 62): ’wd ’br hm zmyq / pyr’mwn ch’r prysp ’wd / s h p’rgyn kyrd. ’wd pd h’n / ‘y ’ndrwn p’rgyn dyw’n ’ndr / przyd. 118 M312/V/13–14 (Werner Sundermann, Ein manichäisch-soghdisches Parabelbuch; mit einem Anhang von Friedmar Geissler (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1985), p. 32. n.138): nxwyn ’byn p’rgyn o [bdyg] t’ryg o hrdyg ’dwryn. 119 Trans. D.n. MacKenzie. M535/V/8−9 (D. n. MacKenzie, “Mani’s šƒbuhragƒn I.,” BSOAS 42 (1979), p. 514 [pp. 500–34]): [h’]n sh p’(r)gyn ‘y [zh]ryn t’ryn / [’]w[d] swcyšn... 120 M98/I/V/7−8 (GSR: 226): “ … he [Mihryazd = Living Spirit] filled the five ditches of death and leveled them” (h’n pnz knd’r ‘y mrg hngnd / ’wd h’mgyn qyrd). 30 the chinese manichaean sea of fire The pits are furthermore logically associated with depth, mentioned in h. 47 as “deep pit” ( h. 49: sui keng 邃坑) or “bottomless pit” ( h. 104: wudi keng 无底坑) in the Chinese sources, and its analogies (abyss, falling) can be found also in non-Chinese ones, as below: I shall deliver (thee) from all the waves of the sea, and from its deep wherein thou hast gone through these drownings. 121 Thou wast held back within the abyss, where all is turmoil; thou wast made captive in every place. / Thou wast suspended amid all rebirths. Thou hast suffered ravage amid all cities. 122 nor is there [limit] for the Darkness in depth. 123 And all who enter there fall head first into the deep abyss. And there they begin to boil in merciless oppression. … [s]o also the boiling souls [are suffering(?)] pain [an]d will never die. 124 In one direction on the border of this bright and holy land there was a land of darkness deep and vast in extent, where abode fiery bodies, destructive races. 125 Thou shall [not] fall (?) within… [where all] (is) full of fire, distress and stabs. 126 They will fall into the deep and be devoured in death. They will clothe themselves in darkness, distress, and fire. 127 The bottomless nature of the Land of Darkness is evidently, though not explicitly, related with the Manichaean concept of its “position”: it is infinite in the south, which actually also means the downwards direction. 128 121 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 147). Angad r±›nƒn VI,45 (MhP, p. 146; MhA, p.17): [’w t] zryy jfr’n o kw pd hwyn nx’b šwd ’yy / [kr’](n) ’(z)’(d) ’c hw o ’wd (’c) hrwyn wrm’n. 122 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 167). Angad r±›nƒn VIIa,13−14 (MhP: 166): ’wt nhxt ’yy ’[w] jfr o cy hrwyn ’šwb / ’wt kyrd ’yy [wrd]g o pd hrwyn wy’g’n / ’wt ’gws(t ’yy) o pd hrwyn ’’jwn / w (bwd ’y)y w(y)gndg o p(d) hr(w)yn šhryst’n. 123 Al-Fihrist (Flügel, Mani, p. 63,6−7; Dodge, The Fihrist of al-Nadim, p. 788). 124 T II D 52 reunited with T I TM 378 4−7, 11−12 (MhA, pp. 31−32): rty wyspy ky ZY wδ’y-δ cyntrp’r / tys’nt ptkwn ’wpt’nt / ZKwy n’ywkw z-wβ’k c’δrp’r ZY wr / βr’γ’z-’nt ’yšty pr pw z-’rnc tr’n(kw) (…) [m’y](δ) ZY m[s pt’w](’nt) xw rw’nt / ’yšy-’n(tc) ZKw’βz[y’ Z]Y kδ[’c]w L’ myr’nt. 125 Trans. R. Stothert, “Against the epistle of Manichaeus Called Fundamental,” in Ph. Schaff, ed., St. Augustin. The Writings Against the Manicheans and Against the Donatists: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church (1887; rpt. Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing, 2004), p. 136 [pp. 129−50]. Contra Epistulam Fundamenti 15,19: Iuxta unam vero partem ac latus illustris illius ac sanctae terrae erat tenebrarum terra profunda et immensa magnitudine, in qua habitabant ignea corpora, genera scilicet pestifera. 126 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 99). Huyadagmƒn VIb,21 (MhP, p. 98; MhA, p. 15): [….ny] (k)[f]’h ’ndr o p(d.)[..](nd)[….](.)(.)[..] / [cy hm]g pwr ’dwr o tn(g)[ ’w](d) wxs’’g. 127 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 165). Angad r±›nƒn VIIa,2 (MhP: 164): qfynd pd jfr’n o x’z’d (b)[w]ynd pd mrn / ’wt p[dm]wcynd ’w t’r o ’w (tnn)g w ’dwr. 128 Byard Bennett, “Iuxta unum latus terra tenebrarum: The Division of Primordial Space in Anti-Manichaean Writers’ Description of the Manichaean Cosmogony,” in Paul Mirecki 31 gábor kósa Though the sea itself is a metaphor of the Land of Darkness, the creatures in it do not have an aquatic, but a fiery nature, which is the manifestation of the greed and lust (tanyu 貪慾; Middle Persian and Parthian ²z, Parthian ƒwarµ±g) inherent in them. This is a rather important motif, as it will ultimately serve as an explanation for the fiery nature of the sea itself. The following citations exemplify the fiery character of the demonic creatures. Thou hast put to shame the demons and devils of fire.. 129 I am in the midst of my enemies, the beasts surrounding me; / the burden which I bear is of the powers and principalities. / They burned (?) in their wrath, they rose against me … they / burnt (?) me in their fire… 130 They became lions in the day through their devouring fire. 131 They [beasts, enemies: G.K.] burn in their fire… 132 Thou shall [not] fall (?) within… [where all] (is) full of fire, distress and stabs. 133 The fifth [property of the King of Darkness: G.K.] is his burning, which burns like an iron as if poured out from fire. 134 And they escaped from hell which is ever aflame. 135 The hideous form … and the (ugly) form; he scorches, he destroys... 136 and Jason BeDuhn, eds., The Light and the Darkness. Studies in Manichaeism and Its World (Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill, 2001), p. 74 [pp. 68–78]. 129 Psalm-Book 64,28: ak+¥ipe NNdaimwn mNNïx Ntsete. 130 Psalm-Book 54,13−15, 17−18: +xNtmhte Nnajaje ere Nchrion kwte ara[i / tetpw e+bi xaras tanaryhu te mNNe3ousia / aum[ou]X xNteubLke autwwn axrhï ajwï (…) au/r]a[y]t xN[t]ousete… 131 Psalm-Book 156,11: au]Rmouï xNpxoou xNtsete Nrefouwm. The lion as a symbol of darkness (or hyl‰) − most probably of Biblical origin − also makes an appearance in the Coptic sources (e.g. Psalm-Book 69,20−21; 107,24−25; cf. Lindt, The Names of Manichaean Mythological Figures, p. 203). Moreover according to the Manichaean and general near eastern astrological tradition, the lion can be paralleled with fire. For another explanation see Martin Schwartz, “From healer to hyl‰: Levantine Iconography as Manichean Mythology,” Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology 1 (2006), pp. 145−47. 132 Trans. I. Gardner. P. Kell. Copt. 2/C1: 47−48 (Gardner, Kellis Literary Texts, p. 66): souryx xN teusete… 133 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 99). Huyadagmƒn VIb,21 (MhP, p. 98; MhA, p. 15): [….ny] (k)[f]’h ’ndr o p(d.)[..](nd)[….](.)(.)[..] / [cy hm]g pwr ’dwr o tn(g)[ ’w](d) wxs’’g. 134 Kephalaia 31,6−7: pmax+ou pe pefrwyX etrwyX Ntxe nou/pei¥ Nbanipe eunaouatxf abal xN tsete. 135 Trans. L.V. Clark (“The Manichean Turkic Pothi-Book,” p. 186/175). D 260,5 V 5 (ibid., 172/line 175): ya[l]mayu turur tamu-tı[n o]ztılar. 136 Trans. M. Boyce (SPAh, p. 442). M507 R 1−2 (SPAh, p. 441; RMMP: am, p. 96): dyw (d)w[r](c)yh[r […] ’w(d) cyhrg oo … h’wyd wyg’(n)[yd]… 32 the chinese manichaean sea of fire And [she [²z: G.K.] placed] greed and lust in [the middle [of the body: G.K.], imitatin[g the Call and the] Answer[ and raging fire was the same as the Column of Glory]. 137 The Dark Tree is [Greed]. And its trunk is the Great Fire. 138 The first hunter [of Darkness: G.K.] is the King of they who belong to the darkness, who hunted after the living soul with his net at the beginning of the worlds. his net is his fire and his lust… 139 And from all sides it is clothed in fierce anger. And fully installed are (there) the blaze and the flame and the merciless fire. And those who are dwelling there are merciless demons. 140 In the eulogy portion of the Traité, the Great Saint figures as a skilful and wise captain on the vast sea ( tr. 325: juhai qiaozhi chuanshi 巨海巧智舩師), and just after this appellation he is named as the merciful helping hand for those who suffer in the pit of fire ( tr. 325: huokeng cibei jiushou 火坑慈悲救手). The pit is associated with fire not only in the Traité ( tr. 325), but also in the Hymnscroll. These instances, however, refer to the mixture of the two principles and the state of the mixed universe that the suffering light-soul wishes to leave. h. 35. We only wish that Jesus would send down his mercy to free us from the bonds of demons. Presently we reside in the pit of fire; lead us quickly and give us peace in the pure land! 141 Monsters, Demons, Beasts The Land of Darkness and the subaquatic world associated with it abound in various types of monsters and beasts: makaras and rƒk™asas, venomous insects and snakes, and so forth (number 4, above). These monsters also appear as the representatives of Darkness and enemies of the soul in other contexts. h. 49–50. All dependants of the ignorant body of flesh, together with those who are in the gloomy pits, the demonic nature that obstructs inside and outside, always harming our pure body. h. 50. All the evil beasts beyond all comparison, all the unclassifiable 137 M240/R/5−6 (Sundermann, Der Sermon vom Licht-Nous, pp. 62−63): ’wd ](’)’z ’wd ’wrjwg (p)[d *mdy’n nš’st] / [pd *xrwštg u] (pdw’)xtg (n)[yš’n… 138 M312/R/3−4 (ibid., pp. 74−75): d’lwg t’ryg / [’’z ](°) ’(w)š tn ’dwr wzrg. 139 Kephalaia 29,18−21: p¥arp Nqerhq pe prro / Nnapkeke petafqwrq at2uyh etanx xm pef¥ne / xN ta00ryh nNkosmos … pef¥ne pe tefse/te mN tefepicumia. 140 T II K 178 R 3−8 (MhA, p. 26): [rt](y) cnn wyspn’cw kyr’n / [n]γwst’kw prw trγw yp’kw oo rty / pwrny pt[š](p)rt’kw xcy xw swc’kh / ZY prδ’w ZY pw z’rcn’wkw ’’tr oo oo / rty ’skw’yn’y-ty ky ZY wr skw’n(t) / pw z-’rc’nw(ktw δy)wt xnt. 141 唯願夷數降慈悲，解我離諸魔鬼縛。現今處在火坑中，速引令安清淨地。 33 gábor kósa poisonous snakes, … 142 h. 65. We are the light-sheep of the Great Saint, who shed tears, cry and complain: the wolves and the other wild beasts abruptly snatched us from the good light-flock. 143 tr. 43−48. The five light-bodies were fettered and suffered like this, they forgot their original nature, as if they were mad or drunken. They were in a state similar to this: if there was a man who wove a basket from snakes with their heads all inside, spitting venom everywhere. he took another man whom he hung inside with his head downward. This man would be covered by venom, and as he was upside down, his mind would be confused, he would not even have time to think of his parents, relatives and his former happiness. now the five light-natures, fettered by the demons in the body of flesh, suffering day and night, were just like this. 144 tr. 52–55. When the envoy of Light appears in the world, he teaches and converts the sentient beings, thus freeing them from suffering. First he sends down the wonderful sound of Law through the gates of ears; next he enters the old habitation and with the great, wonderful spell he fastens all the poisonous snakes and wild beasts so that they could not move. next he takes the axe of wisdom and fells the poisonous trees, removes their trunks and stumps and also the soiled grass. he purifies and adorns the palace, placing there the throne of Law, and takes the seat. 145 In the Coptic Kephalaia there are several references to marine monsters: one of them consists of fire and lust [114,3−115,4], the other is the sea-giant (136,23−26). Similarly, other non-Chinese sources refer to monsters which are associated with water or fire. 146 142 无知肉身諸眷屬，併是幽邃坑中子。內外堛塞諸魔性，常時害我清淨躰。一切惡獸无能比，一切毒蛇何能類。 143 我是大聖明羔子，垂淚含啼訴[訢]冤屈。卒被犲狼諸猛獸，劫我離善光明牧。 144 其五明身，既被如是苦切禁縛，廢忘本心，如狂，如醉。猶如有人以眾毒蛇編之為籠，頭皆在內，吐毒縱橫; 復取一人倒懸於內，其人爾時為毒所逼，及以倒懸，心意迷錯，無暇思惟父母親戚及本歡樂。今五明性在宍身中為魔囚縛，晝夜受苦，亦復如是。 145 若有明使出興於世，教化眾生，令脫諸苦。先從耳門，降妙法音; 後入故宅，持大神呪，禁眾毒蛇及諸惡獸，不令自在; 復齎智斧，斬伐毒樹，除去株杌，并餘穢草。並令清淨，嚴飾宮殿，敷置法座而乃坐之。 146 The description of the world-sea (sm’wtry, Sk.: samudra) which appears among the Sogdian parables seems to symbolize the opposite of the image treated here, nevertheless the figures of beasts, monsters and demons are still present in it (Sundermann, Ein manichäischsoghdisches Parabelbuch, p. 21). It is to be noted, however, that this is basically a Buddhist motif, not a Manichaean one (Werner Sundermann, “eine buddhistische Allegorei in manichäischer Überlieferung,” in R.e. emmerick and D. Weber, eds., Corolla Iranica. Papers in Honour of Prof. Dr. David Neil MacKenzie on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday on April 8th, 1991 [Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1991], pp. 198–206). 34 the chinese manichaean sea of fire And into them ²z mixed her own self. And that part that had fallen into the sea, from that became one hideous, cruel and terrible Mazan [i.e, “monster”, a kind of demon]; and he tottered out of the sea and began sinning in the world. 147 They said that “we came, meanwhile we were travelling in the middle of the sea, there came up a whale from the sea” … 148 …the habitation of the robbers, which / is the body of death, for which every man has wept. / The sea and its waves thou hast destroyed by thy faith (?); / the beasts that are in it, that would submerge thy . . . / thou hast overpowered (?) them in thy voyaging: they knew not nor / comprehended thee. 149 their [the enemies’: G.K.] poison stinging scorpions, / … with their floods of death… 150 The fish in the sea, the demons in their caves. 151 They became lions in the day through their devouring fire. 152 They [beasts, enemies: G.K.] burn in their fire… 153 These examples suggest that the Sea of Fire does not refer to a flaming sea, but much more to a sea populated by monsters with fiery nature (uncontrolled passions, lust). The recently found Manichaean painting (ca. 13−14th centuries) from a Japanese private collection, referred to in my introduction, provides a remarkable parallel. It depicts the Manichaean cosmological system with the ten firmaments above and the eight earths below, and several other typical Manichaean motifs. 154 In the lower part, just above the eight earths, one can see the created 147 Trans. J. Asmussen (Manichaean Literature, p. 124). M7981/I/R/i/5−15 (= T III 260 B I) (RMMP: y, pp. 64–65): °° ’wš’n xwd ’’z / xwyš gryw ’ndr / ’myxt °° ’wd h’n / yk bhr ‘y ’w dry’b / ’wbyst h’nyš / mzn ‘yw dwšcyhr / ’pr ’wd shmyyn / ’cyš bwd ’wd ’c / dry’b b’ ‘škrwst / ’wš nwyst ’ndr / šhr wyn’h kwn’n. 148 Homilies 91,13−14. (hans Jakob Polotsky, ed., Manichäische Homilien, Manichäische handschriften der Sammlung A. Chester Beatty 1 [Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1934], p. 91): pajeu je anei enmaxe N[tmhte nca]/lassa · aukhtos ei axrhï xNcala[ssa. 149 Psalm-Book 70,1−6: pm[an]¥wpe NNlhsth[s ete n/taf pe pswma Mpmou petaouan nim rime [nef/calassa mNnesximeeu aknarsou xNpekn[ax/te · Nchrion etNxhtS etouw¥ swxP Ntek[ . . . / akjepjwpou xNtekqINSqhr empousaune [m/pouMme arak. 150 Trans. I. Gardner (Kellis Literary Texts, p. 64). P. Kell. Copt. 2/37−38 (Iain Gardner, Kellis Literary Texts, p. 64): [ ]xe anouoxe Nbakmet’’`oue / [ ]m xN neukataklusmos Nte pmou. 151 T II D 259 V 90−91 (Bang and Gabain, Türkische Turfan-Texte, pp. 192−193): talui ögüztäkii balïqlar … ünkürintäkii yäk ongžïn-lar. 152 Psalm-Book 156,11: au]Rmouï xNpxoou xNtsete Nrefouwm. 153 Trans. I. Gardner (Kellis Literary Texts, p. 68). P. Kell. Copt. 2/C1: 47−48 (Gardner, Kellis Literary Texts, p. 66): sourayx xN teusete… 154 See Yutaka Yoshida, “Shinshutsu Maniky± kaiga no keijij±,” pl. 1. 35 gábor kósa world with the Buddhist symbol of Mount Sumeru (also appearing in Manichaean texts). Mount Sumeru is surrounded by an island (meaning continents) on which various mythological scenes are depicted. The whole island seems to float on a dark sea. At four points of the sea, one can discern the heads of three monsters, twelve heads altogether. The most conspicuous feature of these sea monsters is the fire which comes out of their mouths. This new piece of evidence unexpectedly corroborated my previous interpretation. The mojie (makara) mentioned in h. 19 is worth analyzing independently, as it appears directly after the poisoned sea of the carnal body. The text, moreover, links it with the motif of sinking ships. h. 19. now we sincerely implore and supplicate that we should be removed from the poisoned fire-sea of the body of flesh, / its tossing waves are boiling and bubbling ceaselessly, the makaras surface and submerge to swallow (our) vessel. 155 Mojie 魔竭 is, as seen above, a Chinese transcription of the Sanskrit makara, which denotes an aquatic monster that often threatens maritime merchants. Aside from eight examples in the whole Buddhist Canon, this word is basically always written with another mo character ( 摩). The scribe of the Hymnscroll might have had two reasons to use “ 魔”: first, to avoid association with Mƒn… (Moni 摩尼), whose standard name, though not Mangni 忙你 (as used in the Hymnscroll), contains this character; secondly, 魔, signifying anything demonic (Mƒra), is obviously much more suitable for the negative meaning of the makara figure. In his Yiqie jing yinyi 一切經音義, compiled in 810, huilin 慧琳 defines the makara as follows: “Mojie [makara] is a Sanskrit word; it denotes a huge fish in the sea which swallows all aquatic creatures and swallows the boats and the ships.” 156 According to a Buddhist legend, well-known in the Tang era, and retold, for example, in the famous Fayuan zhulin 法苑珠林 compiled by Dao Shi 道世 in 668, the triple repetition of Buddha’s name once saved a ship of merchants from the makara. 157 我今懇切求哀請，願離肉身毒火海。騰波沸涌无暫停，魔竭出入吞舩舫。 T. 54.2128: 577a.24: 摩竭者，梵語也。海中大魚吞啗一切諸水族類及吞船舶者。 It is interesting to see that the motif of a makara destroying a ship laden with treasure was already present in the Mahƒbhƒrata (J. Ph. Vogel, “errors in Sanskrit Dictionaries,” BSOAS 20.1/3 [1957], pp. 563−64 [pp. 561−67]). 157 Though it most probably had no role in the choice of the word, it is still interesting to note that one of the chief characteristics of makara is its hybrid nature (crocodile, elephant, rhinoceros, dolphin, sometimes other animals) (Gail h. Sutherland. The Development of the yak™a in Hinduism and Buddhism [Albany: SUnY Press, 1991], p. 35; Filippo Salviati, “The “Fishdragon”: The Makara Motif in Chinese Art and Architectural Decoration,” Environmental Design: Journal of the Islamic Environmental Design Research Centre 1−2 [1997−99], pp. 238−51), which is a salient feature of the Land of Darkness, and its king (e.g. Kephalaia 155 156 36 the chinese manichaean sea of fire The Sˆtra of Great Compassion says: “Buddha said to ²nanda: ‘… Once an influential merchant travelled with other merchants, and a makara wanted to swallow their ship. They called “namo Buddhƒya” thrice and were all saved from the peril.’ ” 158 In the Manichaean Hymnscroll ( h. 19), the supplication for the removal of makaras who want to swallow the ship probably evoked this story and the similar “rescue-narratives”, especially those associated with Guanyin, which were extremely popular in Tang times. 159 Tossing Waves The negative associations connected with the image of the sea derive from the fact that according to the Manichaean imagination the sea produces huge and perilous waves (see list, number 5), partly caused by the monsters below, partly by the storms, thus travellers can never feel safe: they have no solid ground under their feet, so they are like wanderers whose safe home lies in another world ( h. 249, h. 251, h. 260: liulang 流浪). h. 249. We also tell you, beneficent light-brothers: select the wonderful (light-)bodies consciously and thoughtfully, you should be brave and wise captains of the ships, who carry over these wavetossed other-worldly sons. 160 h. 251. Our noble race has been tossed by the waves for so many years, quickly return them to their original home, to the place of happiness! 161 h. 260. As for the wave-tossed, otherwordly, one-morning guests [the elect], invite and gratify them, the adorned monasteries should be always pure, you should industriously handle the clothes and the food, thus escaping the sea in pairs. 162 30,34−31,2; Klimkeit, “The Fair Form,” p. 157). To mention yet another coincidence, in India makara equates with the constellation Capricorn, which in the Manichaean system belongs to the dark element/world of Darkness (Kephalaia 167,29−31), thus — with the Scorpion-snake — it is the darkest even among the dark elements. 158 T. 53.2122: 433c.29−434a.03: 又大慈經云: 佛告阿難: … 去有大商主，將諸商人為摩竭大魚欲來吞舟。由三稱南無佛名，並皆免難。 See e.g. Dabei jing 大悲經 T. 12.380: 957c; Dazhi du lun 大智度論 T. 25.1509: 109a; Fanyi mingyi ji 翻譯名義集 T. 54.2131: 1091b. 159 On the various monster figures in Chinese Manichaica and the Guanyin chapter of the Lotus-sˆtra, see Kósa Gábor, “Buddhist Monsters in the Chinese Manichaean Hymnscroll,” in I. Beller-hahn and Zs. Rajkai, eds., Frontiers and Boundaries of China (forthcoming). 160 復告善業明兄弟，用心思惟詮妙身，各作勇健智舩主，渡此流浪他鄉子。 161 貴族流浪已多年，速送本鄉安樂處。 162 流浪他鄉一朝客，既能延請令歡喜。庄嚴寺舍恒清淨，勤辦衣糧雙出海。 37 gábor kósa The non-Chinese sources also show the richness of the notion, sometimes more precisely specifying that the chaotic, rough and stormy sea is troubled by the breath or agitation of the monsters in the depths. 163 none can be confident while he is in the midst of the sea / and has not yet come to port. / For he knows not the hour when the storm shall rise / against him. 164 Guide for me my Spirit in the midst of the stormy sea. 165 the pearl of Light which… from the troubled sea. 166 … in the breath that the sea gi[ant] will breathe and draw it into him that he might disturb the sea. 167 It [fashio]ned the trees [up/on] the dry (land); but in the sea it immediat[ely] took form and made a great uprising in the sea. 168 Who will take me over the flood of the tossing sea, / The zone of conflict in which there is no rest? 169 (The First Man) like a humble shepherd among the wild animals, a helmsman in the middle of the roughness of the sea, like a sovereign in the middle of fight and battle. … Quickly he came down [like] a rock (thrown) into the sea. 170 The ceaseless and stormy streams of waves also serve as appropriate metaphors to express the notion that — in contrast with the tranquility, peace and stability of the Realm of Light — the Land of Darkness is characterized by chaotic movements and incessant changes. 171 163 164 Sundermann, Ein manichäisch-soghdisches Parabelbuch, p. 21. n.30. Psalm-Book 135,25−28: mn]laue ¥kaxht abal efxNtmhte Mpiam em/patefmane / j]e mN¥ef gar atxate etere pqasme nanexse / araf. 165 Psalm-Book 150,28: arixMme nhï MpaPNA · efxn[tmht]e Mpiam etbi xaime. 166 Trans. I. Gardner and S.n.C. Lieu (Gardner and Lieu, Manichaean Texts from the Roman Empire, p. 86). Homilies 55,18−19 (Polotsky, Manichäische Homilien, p. 55): pmargariths Nouaïne petna[…..] / [b]al NNcalassa et¥RtarT. 167 Kephalaia 115,27−28: …xM pnife de etere pgi/[gas] Ncalassa naneftf nFsakF nef efatax calassa. 168 Kephalaia 92,21−23: af[plas]se NN¥hn [xi/jm] pet¥ouwu xN calassa xwwf asmoungk Ntoun[ou] / asr ounaq Nbeqse xN txalassa. 169 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP, p. 81). Huyadagmƒn IVa,2 (T II D 178 II R; MhP, p. 80): kym hynw’r wyd’r’ o cy zryh ’ywštg / zwnws rzm’hyg kw ’ngwn ny ’st. Cf. Waldschmidt−Lentz, “Die Stellung Jesu im Manichäismus,” p. 112. 170 Trans. J. Asmussen (Manichaean Literature, pp. 120−121). Reunited fragments M819 and M2154/R/3−7, 10−12 (Sundermann, Mittelpersische und parthische kosmogonische und Parabeltexte, pp. 43−44, lines 797−801, 804−6): c’wn šwb’n ‘y nrm[□ □{?}] / my’n dd’n ° n’w’z ’ndr / my’n dry’b pdšyb(y)[šn] / ° c’wn šhry’r my’n ’r(d)[yg] / ’wd rzm’h (…) z(w)[d pd] / nyxw’r prwd ’wxyst (°) [cwn] / wym ‘y wzrg ’w dr(y)[’b]. 171 See e.g. Contra Manichaei opiniones disputatio 5,8: “The random movement present in all beings is called hyl‰ (by Mƒn…). τὴν γὰρ ἐν ἑκάστῳ τῶν ὄντων ἄτακτον κίνησιν, ταύτην 38 the chinese manichaean sea of fire Ships and Treasure As is evident from V. Arnold-Döben’s analysis, the motif of ships carrying treasure and being menaced by waves and monsters is widespread in Manichaeism. 172 This motif is also connected with the Sea of Fire in the Chinese sources as monsters swallow ships and sink treasure and merchants (as above). These elements are also described in other parts of the Chinese Manichaica. tr. 325. [The Great Saint] is also a skilful and wise captain on the vast sea…. 173 h. 77. Increase our memory in every hour, remove the demonmouths which are able to swallow, if you remove the demonmouths which are able to swallow, we will forever be remote from the … of the evil-doing Demon(ess) of Greed. 174 h. 250. These are the precious treasures of the Light-honoured One, all of you should use the ship of your body to get them out from the sea, diligently heal the tormented ones with wounds and boils, for long have they been sad and waiting for rescue and custody. 175 h. 252. The upright sons of Light with perfect forms, quickly pull out [the light-elements] from the storehouse of greed and desire, search for precious treasure in the deep sea of suffering, and hasten to offer [them] to the Pure King of nirvƒ¡a. 176 The motif of merchants’ seeking or carrying treasure on the sea which is full of enemies is based on the archetypical image of the First Man after the attack of Darkness. 177 This primeval event repeats itself in the middle period of the cosmogony until it ceases to happen in the final era. I know not where the Son of evil saw / it, he took thieves and sent them to it (?), the thieves poured upon the ship, they drew it out into the middle of the / sea, they wounded its helmsmen, they ὕλην καλεῖ.” (See André Villey, Alexandre de Lycopolis: Contre la doctrine de Mani, Sources Gnostiques et Manichéennes 2 [Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1985], pp. 58, 128−33.) 172 Arnold-Döben, Die Bildersprache des Manichäismus, pp. 63−70. On the symbolism of ships and captains see also Sundermann 1995; Rui Chuanming 芮传明, “Monijiao ‘chuan’ yu ‘chuanzhu’ kaoshi 摩尼教船与船主考释,” Ou-Ya xuekan 欧亚学刊 1.12 (1999), pp. 223−42; Klimkeit, Manichaean Art and Calligraphy, pp. 14−15. 173 亦是巨海巧智 / 舩師 … 174 一切時中增記念，令離能吞諸魔口; 令離能吞諸魔口，永隔惡業貪魔□。 175 此是明尊珎貴寶，咸用身舩般出海，勤毉被刻苦瘡疣，久已悲哀希救護。 176 端正光明具相子，早拔離於貪欲藏; / 幽深苦海尋珎寶，奔奉涅槃清淨王。 177 Arnold-Döben, Die Bildersprache des Manichäismus, p. 64. 39 gábor kósa that were entrusted / with the treasure, they were endangered. They seized the treasure / of the Mighty one which is measureless and beyond counting, they stole / the wealth of the Living ones… 178 The First Man], our helmsman … our first / guide, thou art our shepherd that feeds (?) us… 179 With the descent of the First Man, he and his sons, the light elements, sank in the Land of Darkness; using the metaphor under discussion, in the deep sea. While the First Man was led up, the light-elements — the pearls and the treasure stolen by Darkness — must be collected with the help of a ship steered by somebody essentially belonging to the Realm of Light (an elect, the Light-nous, Jesus, Mƒn… or noah). These ships return the lost treasures to the safe harbour, the Realm of Light. 180 The quotations below illustrate how non-Chinese Manichaeans used treasure and ship as metaphors. Thou art the buried treasure, the chief of my wealth, / the pearl which (is) the beauty of all the gods. 181 … upon them, he spread out the great sea, / … called it the sky, he spread out this / great sea, he built the ships and launched them on it, / the ships of the great traders, the faithful / men of Truth, the barks of the merchants, that will convey / up the distilled part to life. But he subdued the great / sea, he subdued the rebels also that are in it, he / sank the rebels also in it … 182 Lo, the ship has put in for you, noah is aboard, he steers. / The ship is the commandment, noah is the Mind of Light. / embark your merchandise, sail with the dew of the wind. 183 …hasten and come quickly, [board] the bark of the holy ones, that it may not set out and leave you behind. 184 178 Psalm-Book 207,23−29: MpiqN Nta p¥hre Mppecau neu / araf to · afbi Nsane afjausou araf : ansane / pwxT ajNpjaï · ausakF abal atmhte Mppe/lagos : nefrefRxMme au¥aqou · ne[tt]Nxat / apyrhma aukinduneue : autwrP pyrhma / M]ppetaï · pete mN ¥i mN hpe araf : aukwl[p / N]tmNtrMmao NnetanX … 179 Psalm-Book 13,31−32: p¥arp nrwm]e pNrefRxMm[e . . . . .] . pN¥arP / Njaumaït Ntak pe pN¥ws etm[ane] Mman. Cf. Arnold-Döben, Die Bildersprache des Manichäismus, pp. 49−51. Trans. M. Boyce (MhP, p. 147). Angad r±›nƒn VI,51 (MhP, p. 146): ’wd tw ’yy ng’n o sr cy mn frg’w / ’wd mwrg’ryd o cy hrw yzd’n hwcyhryf t. 182 Psalm-Book 213,1−8: . . . . . a]jwou : afpwrÝ Ntnaq Ncalas[sa / . .] . . . . moute 180 181 aras je tpe : afpwrÝ N+/na]q Ncalassa · afsmN nejhu afnajou aras : / ne]jhu Nte Nnaq Nemporos · nirMMmhe / M]pistos : Nqinouel Nte ne¥ate · netapwn/e pswfT axrhï apwnX : afcBïo xwf Ntnaq / Ncalassa · afcBïo Nkaibe3eue etNxhtS : af/wmS neskaibe3eue NxhtS. 183 Psalm-Book 157,19−21: eis pjaï ¥enit arwtN · nwxe telait fRxMme / pjaï pe tentolh · nwxe pe pnous Nouaïne / telo NnetNïep¥ate · Rxwt mNtïwte Nthu. 184 Psalm-Book 76,28−30: pxap ¥wtP Mmw/tN amhïne Nqla[m telo] apqinouel Nte 40 the chinese manichaean sea of fire Nets The symbol of the net in the Chinese Manichaean texts is usually applied as an instrument of Darkness: that of opposing (“heretical” from the Manichaean point of view) teachings which can trap the pure elect ( tr. 301−3, h. 189, h. 229) or the light-nature ( h. 90). tr. 301–3. his first [characteristic] is that he is good at removing the impurity from the heart, not letting greed and lust [reign], he can make his own light-nature attain constant freedom. he can think of women as empty and false concepts, he is not detained and hindered by beauty and charm. Like a bird which flies high, he cannot perish in a bird-net. 185 h. 90. The skilful craftsman who created the body of flesh is the mendacious and evil demon-king, the result was this cavedwelling, with a net he caught the light-nature and also hid himself [within]. 186 h. 189. And also always take care of the pure and wonderful community, remove hatred and fury, the soiled and impure teachings, advance courage and do not let them droop, remove the poison of the Demon-King’s inimical net! 187 h. 229. earthly desires should not awake greed, nobody should be caught by the net of the demon-tribe! Let us praise the Lightnous, he is the dharma-king, he can collect us from the trap of death! 188 Similarly, in non-Chinese texts nets symbolize traps which seduce the pure chosen ones, especially with the temptations of sensual pleasures and the body, at the same time threatening them with rebirth. The joy of earthly things, the pleasure of the [sensual] forms and the things of the world are like sweet food in which poison is mixed. It [the food] holds the soul in its [the demons’] net. 189 Let us quickly break the nets of the body … 190 netou/abe je nefqwou abal Nflo xarwtN. 185 一者善拔穢 / 心，不令貪慾，使己明性常得自在; 能於女人作虛假想，不為諸色之所留難，如鳥高非，不 / 殉羅網。Fei 非 evidently stands for fei 飛 here (cf. Léonard Aurousseau, “Éd. Chavannes & P. Pelliot, Un traité manichéen retrouvé en Chine, J A 1911, II: 499–617. (Rev.),” BEFEO 12 (1912), p. 61 [pp. 53–63]). The bird-net metaphor is also used in the Psalm-Book (204,19−21; 70,10−13; 89,25−27). 186 當造肉身由巧匠，即是虛妄惡魔王，成就如斯窟宅已，網捕明性自潛藏。 187 又復常鑒淨妙眾，令離怨嗔濁穢法; 勤加勇猛无閑暇，令離魔王犯網毒。 188 世界諸欲勿生貪，莫被魔家網所着。堪譽惠明是法王，能收我等離死錯。 189 Trans. h.-J. Klimkeit (GSR: 56). M77/R/1−3 (RMMP: bh, p. 116): lwg (n)’z ’wd ‘skym ’wrjwg ’wd šhr / ‘yr’n °° m’nh’g ’hynd ’w wxš wxrdyg kw / jhr ’myxt nhynjyd gryw (’c) hwyn cyng. 190 Psalm-Book 165,9: marNpwx xNouqlam NN¥nhu Mpswm[a . . . . 41 gábor kósa May we be ones who untie the net and the snare of birth and death. 191 Tied up in death, the net of demons, where my soul is caught…192 On the other hand, the net, which is a light-net in tr. 338, can also play a positive role, as it can save the sufferer from the waves of the Sea of Fire. This double function of the net is remarkably illustrated by the fifth kephalaion, which circumstancially relates that both the representatives of the Realm of Light and those of the Land of Darkness make use of nets (¥ne) to pursue their goals. 193 hunter of light · 1 First Man … and his powers his net hunter of darkness · his net 1 King of Darkness his fire & lust 2 Third Ambassador his light ........................................ [glorious] image 2 evil counsel (its powers) 3 Jesus the Splendour light wisdom 3 Lust 4 The great counsel Living Spirit 4 Darkness, sin & death −− erroneous teaching The light-net (ming wang 明網), mentioned in col. 338 of the Traité, is consequently not unique in the Manichaean tradition, as both the depiction of the light-form (xikwn [nouaï]ne), and the light-wisdom (sovia Nouaï[ne]) as nets are convenient, though remote, analogies of the Chinese expression. 194 Rebirth The Sea of Fire is also associated with sa¿sƒra, which is the wheel, or roads, of rebirths (see above). 195 A Chinese line and a Manichaean Uyghur analogy both eminently attest that the Sea of Fire, the sea of sufferings, that is sa¿sƒra, is the exact opposite of nirvƒ¡a in Manichaeism as well: 191 Trans. L.V. Clark (“The Manichean Turkic P o t h i - B o o k ,” p. 189/line 347). D 260,26/R/1−2 (ibid., p. 176/lines 346−347): tuγmaq / ölmeklig toruγ tuzaqıγ šešteč[ii] bolalım. 192 Transl. according to Prods Oktor Skjaervø’s suggestion (“A Triplet of Manichean Middle Iranian Studies,” Bulletin of the Asia Institute 18 (2003[2008]), p. 152 [pp. 147−66]). M5860/ I/8−10 (Reck, Gesegnet sei dieser Tag, p. 128, lines 612−14): dyw’n d’mg / mrn ’(my)’stg / qw(m) gy’n gryftg… . I thank Prof. Yoshida for this reference. 193 Kephalaia 28,7−30,7; also 58,9−10. 194 Fishing in a positive sense (more precisely: abandoning a metaphorical fishing for a literal one) is referred to in the Psalm-Book (187,15−17), which also evokes the Biblical context: “The traitor persuaded them to be fishermen as they were at first and to lay down their nets with which they caught men unto life.” 195 Disagreeing with Giovanni Casadio, “The Manichaean Metempsychosis: Typology and historical Roots,” in Gernot Wiessner and hans-Joachim Klimkeit, eds., Studia Manichaica. Internationaler Kongress zum Manichäismus. Bonn, 1989. aug. 6.–10 (Wiesbaden: Otto harrassowitz, 1992), p. 111. n.25 [pp. 105–30]. 42 the chinese manichaean sea of fire h. 85. … [We must] diligently seek for nirvƒ¡a to cross the sea of fire. 196 You led them across the sea of suffering, / You brought them near to good nirvƒ¡a. 197 As fire is often associated with the principle of darkness, which is in turn closely connected to the world of rebirths, 198 it is not surprising that a Parthian fragment correlates fire and rebirth: And at the coming of ²z three ways of death are revealed, the hidden fire and the visible fire (both leading) to transmigration, and (good) smell and flowers to paradise. 199 Rebirth is a frequent theme in the Chinese Manichaean texts ( tr. 51–52, h. 62, h. 95, h. 99, h. 118, h. 99, h. 226, h. 247, h. 272), in certain cases one can also find it associated with sea and water. In the Buddhist expression shengsi [da]hai 生死[ 大] 海, also used by the Manichaeans, dahai 大海 [ocean] is the Chinese equivalent of Sanskrit sƒgara (“ocean”): it expresses a great and endless number (of lives), and is not necessarily related to the ocean itself. 200 A similar case is the Chinese equivalent of Parthian gryw jywndg (Living Self), xingming hai 性命海 which has no marine association ( h. 12, h. 73, h. 224, h. 331). 201 Despite these facts, in the case of another frequently used, analogous Buddhist expression (“the flow of birth and death, shengsi liu 生死流), the aquatic nature cannot be denied. Both the “sea of birth and death” ( tr. 48, h. 52, Ch 174 V: shengsi hai 生死海), and “the flow of birth and death” ( h. 74: shengsi liu 生死流) appear in the Chinese Manichaean texts. 202 勤求涅槃超火海。 Trans. L. V. Clark (“The Manichean Turkic Pothi-Book,” p. 182). U 87 V 1−2 ( Jens Wilkens, “Musings on the Manichaean ‘pothi’ Book,” Nairiku Ajia gengo no kenkyˆ 内陸アジア言語の研究 23 [2008], p. 215 [pp. 209−31]): “[äm]ġäklig taloytın käčürtüŋüz / ä[d].g [ü] nirvankah yakın elttiŋiz.” A similar, though less Buddhicized fragment contrasts rebirth (’jwn), the sufferings of hell with the Paradise of Light (M7 II R i 25−30; GSR: 48). 198 Kephalaia (21,28−31) for example calls it one of the members of the evil Tree. 199 Trans. W. Sundermann (“The Zoroastrian and the Manichaean Demon ²z,” pp. 335−36). M5750/V/i/4−12 (ibid., pp. 335): ’wd pd ’mdyšnyh ‘y ’’z sh r’h ‘y mrg pyd’g bwd oo ’dwr ‘y (n)hwftg w ’dwr ‘yg ’šq’rg ’w wrdyšn oo w bwy ’wd ‘sprhmg’n ’w whyšt. 200 hubert Durt, “Daikai,” in Paul Demiéville, ed., H±b±girin: Dictionnaire encyclopédique du bouddhisme d’après les sources chinoises et japonaises. Septième volume: Daij± − Daishi (Paris and Ky±to, 1994), p. 817 [pp. 817−33]. 201 See Waldschmidt–Lentz, “Die Stellung Jesu im Manichäismus,” p. 74; Bryder, The Chinese Transformation of Manichaeism, p. 69; cf. Victor M. Mair, review of Lieu, Manichaeism in the Later Roman Empire and Medieval China, and Bryder, The Chinese Transformation of Manichaeism (T P 73 [1987], p. 320 [pp. 313–24]). 202 Among others, the following elements might have contributed to the formation of these related notions: the image of the continuous undulation of the sea resembles the notion of impermanence (in Chinese: death), and the fact that both in terms of men and fish, the change of substance results in the change between life and death. 196 197 43 gábor kósa tr. 48–49. next the Pure Wind made two light-ships which carry over the good sons from the sea of birth and death to their original realm, thus making light-nature happy forever. 203 h. 52. The finite and the infinite, the body and the soul, how long have they been submerged and wounded in the sea of birth and death? 204 h. 74. [Your] jewels are perfect, the leaves of mercy, sweet-dew and ever-fresh, they never wither, those who eat from it can cut the flow of birth and death forever, your fragrance fills the world. 205 h. 406–8. This-and-this person has left his body of flesh, his deeds were not perfect, thus we are afraid that he will sink in the sea of sufferings. We only wish that the two great luminaries, the fivefold law-body, the pure teacher-elect with the power of great compassion would rescue that soul, and make him leave the cycle of rebirths, the solidified bodies, and all the hells, the boiling cauldrons and the blaze of furnaces. 206 Ch 174 V. To avoid the sea of birth and death of sa¿sƒra ... 207 Though the expression “Sea of Fire” itself does not appear in Buddhist texts, some conceptual analogies (if the fire of Darkness is the ultimate cause of sufferings) do: the “sea of afflictions” or “flow of afflictions” (fannao [da]hai 煩惱[ 大] 海, fannao liu 煩惱流), or the “sea of sufferings”, the “flow of sufferings” (kuhai 苦海, kuliu 苦流) are repeatedly used. In Buddhist sources both notions are often supplemented by the expression of “birth and death”, that is rebirth (shengsi fannao hai 生死煩惱海, shengsi kuhai 生死苦海). These occurrences are important for the very reason that some of them are also used in Manichaean texts ( h. 93: 煩惱海; h. 252, h. 406: 苦海). Despite the fact that the Syriac (ta›p…kƒ nap›ƒtƒ), the Greek (μεταγγισμός) 208 and the Coptic (metaggismos) 209 expressions refer to 又復淨風造二明舩，於生死海運渡善子，達於本界，令光明性究竟安樂。有礙无礙諸身性，久已傷沈生死海。 205 眾寶具足慈悲葉，甘露常鮮不彫果，食者永絕生死流，香氣芬芳周世界! 206 某乙明性去離肉身，業行不圓，恐沈苦海，唯願二大光明，五分法身，清淨師僧，大慈悲力救拔彼性，令離輪迴，剛強之躰及諸地獄，鑊湯爐炭。 207 得免輪迴生死海... . Gunner B. Mikkelsen, “The Fragments of Chinese Manichaean Texts from the Turfan Region,” in Desmond Durkin-Meisterernst, Simone-Christiane Raschmann, Jens Wilkens, Marianne Yaldiz, and Peter Zieme, eds., Turfan Revisited: The First Century of Research into the Arts and Cultures of the Silk Road (Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag, 2004), p. 217 [pp. 213–20]. 208 e.g. Panarion 66,55; K. holl, ed., Epiphanius (Ancoratus und Panarion), III. Panarion contra omnes haereses, 65–80. De Fide. (GCS 37.) (Leipzig: J.C. hinrichs, 1933): “he [Mƒn…] professes that souls flow over from one body to another” [μεταγγισμοὺς δὲ ψυχῶν διηγεῖται ἀπὸ σωμάτων εἰς σωμάτα]. 209 See Sarah Clackson, erica hunter, Samuel n. C. Lieu, and Mark Vermes, eds., Diction203 204 44 the chinese manichaean sea of fire “pouring over”, “transfusion” (the soul from one body to another, from one vessel to another), 210 one finds in the texts themselves hardly any reference to aquatic concepts behind the expressions. 211 On the other hand, in connection with the Parthian words z’dmwrd (Sogd.: z’δmwrd) and ’’ jwn, which are equivalent to Chinese shengsi 生死, the notion of waves and depth does appear. 212 Who will lead me beyond rebirths and free me from (them) all − / and from all the waves in which there is no rest? 213 Thou wast held back within the abyss, where all is turmoil; thou wast made captive (?) in every place. / Thou wast suspended amid all rebirths. Thou hast suffered ravage amid all cities. 214 Although the rolling sea might be an image of the difficulties of earthly life and the sufferings of the soul in the body, 215 still it equally or even more prominently evokes the notion of the cycle of rebirths which is ultimately the root of sufferings for the light-elements. 216 This association, as the sources suggest, is an eastern Manichaean (Parthian, Chinese) development, in all probability inspired by the Buddhist terminology. Deliverance For the Chinese Manichaeans, as seen from h. 406–8, rebirth was nearly equal with eternal hell. 217 however, it should also be added that this utmost fear of rebirth derives not only from anxious care for the particular individual, but for the light-nature, that is, the Living Soul, which is thus forced to proceed to new bodily forms, 218 and is thus exposed to various kinds of suffering. The wish to terminate the ary of Manichaean Texts. Vol. 1. Texts from the Roman Empire: Texts in Syriac, Greek, Coptic and Latin (Turnhout: Brepols, 1999), p. 75. 210 A. V. Williams Jackson, “The Doctrine of Metempsychosis in Manichaeism,” J A O S 45 (1925), p. 256 [pp. 246–68]. 211 See Casadio, “The Manichaean Metempsychosis”. 212 Cf. ibid., p. 110. 213 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP, p. 83). Huyadagmƒn IVa,5 (MhP, p. 82): kym ’’jwn ‘zw’y’h o ’wt ’c hrwyn ’[b](d)’c’ / ’wt ’c hrwyn wrm o kw ’ngwn ny ’st. 214 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP: 167). Angad r±›nƒn VIIa,13−14 (MhP: 166): ’wt nhxt ’yy ’[w] jfr o cy hrwyn ’šwb / ’wt kyrd ’yy [wrd]g o pd hrwyn wy’g’n / ’wt ’gws(t ’yy) o pd hrwyn ’’jwn / w (bwd ’y)y w(y)gndg o p(d) hr(w)yn šhryst’n. 215 Arnold-Döben, Die Bildersprache des Manichäismus, pp. 63, 68; Klimkeit, “The Fair Form,” p. 163. 216 Also cf. Klimkeit, Manichaean Art and Calligraphy, p. 14. 217 Cf. Kephalaia 234,24−236,6; 249,31−251,25, also see al-Fihrist (Flügel, Mani, p. 71,9– 12; Dodge, The Fihrist of al-Nadim, p. 796); T II D 173b,2 (GSR: 326−27). 218 Cf. BeDuhn, The Manichaean Body, p. 223. 45 gábor kósa torment of light explains why it must be freed from all forms as soon as possible. T II T 1319–Ch. 258a. he always rescues the light-nature, he removes them from all births and deaths: from the fields and the sand deserts, from the rivers and the seas, from the springs and sources, from the grass and the trees, and the seedlings and fruits, from the Four Courtyards and the Three Ditches, he pulls all of them out from land and water. 219 [You save the So]ul, the Living / from the cycle of rebirths, / from the mountains and the [valleys / the ? ] and the deserts, / from the r[ivers and] springs, from the t[rees and] flowers, the walls and tombs, / from the earths of dry and wet. 220 The rough sea with tossing waves as the metaphor of rebirth is also a fitting image to represent the liberation of the individual or the suffering Living Soul from it (see the Chinese terms, above, in the list of nine motifs). tr. 48–49. next the Pure Wind made two light-ships which carry over the good sons from the sea of birth and death to their original realm, thus making light-nature happy forever. h. 250. These are the precious treasures of the Light-honoured One, all of you should use the ship of your body to get them out from the sea, diligently heal the tormented ones with wounds and boils, for long have they been waiting for rescue and custody. h. 252. The upright sons of Light with perfect forms, quickly pull out (the light-elements) from the storehouse of greed and desire, search for precious treasures in the deep sea of suffering, and hasten to offer (them) to the Pure King of nirvƒ¡a. h. 260. The wave-tossed, otherwordly, one-morning guests [the elects], invite and gratify them, the adorned monasteries should be always pure, you should industriously handle the clothes and the food, thus escaping the sea in pairs. As mentioned above, the archetypical image of this deliverance is the leading up of the First Man from the Land of Darkness, while other 219 常救諸明性 / 離諸生死/ 於諸山谷中 / 原野及砂磧 / 江海及泉源 / 卉木兼苗實 / 四院及三災 / 水陸皆柚出。(Mikkelsen, “The Fragments of Chinese Manichaean Texts”, p. 216). 220 M8287 – So 102000/1(5) (Sundermann, “Iranian Manichaean Texts,” p. 106: [tw bwjyh gy]’n’n / jywndg’n ’c z’dmwrd oo / [’c] kwf’n ’wt [dr’n oo] / [’c ? u ]šwr’n oo / [’]c rw[d’n’ wd ] x’ns’r’n oo / ’c d[’lwg’n u] ’rwr’n oo / ’c prysp’n [’]wd wdr’n oo / ’c hwškbyd ’wt xwstbyd [oo]. In addition there is also a less precise Sogdian parallel (So 14411; Sundermann, “Iranian Manichaean Texts,” p. 107). 46 the chinese manichaean sea of fire similar descriptions, as exemplified by the following non-Chinese descriptions, also reflect the marine imagery. he [the Living Spirit: G.K.] brought the First Man up from the contest, the way a pearl is [brought] up from the sea. 221 Who shall free me from every … (from) blazing fire and the distress of [destruction]. 222 Lo, the fight I have finished, lo my ship I have brought to the shore, / no storm has overwhelmed it, no wave has seized it. 223 I passed above the sea… / the traps of death… 224 Deliverance from the Sea of Fire and thus from the cycle of rebirth appears in hymns addressed to Jesus ( h. 26, h. 52, h. 74), of which we also have some non-Chinese fragments. Lord Jesus, save my soul from this birth-death [rebirth], save my soul from this birth-death [rebirth]! 225 Jesus−Maiden of Light, Mƒr Mani, Jesus−Maiden of Light, Mƒr Mani, have [mercy] upon me, oh merciful Bringer of Light! Redeem my soul from this cycle of rebirth, redeem my soul from [this] cycle of rebirth… 226 In several cases, rescue from the sea can be connected to Jesus, which in the Western sources at least can be explained by the Biblical references to his stilling the storm and the sea (Matthew 8,23−27, Mark 4,35−41, Luke 8,22−25). In the midst of the sea, Jesus, guide me. / Do not abandon us that the waves may not seize us. / When I utter thy name over the sea, it stills its waves. 227 221 Kephalaia 85,24−25: af N p¥arp nrwme axrhï abal mpagwn txe N/[o]umargariths eu[NtF] axrhï abal ncalassa. 222 Trans. M. Boyce (MhP, p. 133). Angad r±›nƒn IIIb,12 (MhP, p. 132): kym ’bd’cyndyy o ’c hrw […. ….] / wxšyndg ’dwr o ’wd h(w) tnng (’)[bn’s]. 223 Psalm-Book 63,13−14: ei]s pagwn aïjakF abal eis pajaï aïNtF apkro / Mpe qasme nexse araf Mpe xaïme twrP Mmaf. 224 Psalm-Book 69,23−24: aïRpsantpe Ntcalassa … / Mpa¥f Mpmou … 225 M311/V/12−16 (Reck, Gesegnet sei dieser Tag, p. 142): yyšw / xwd’y’ bwj’ mn rw’n ’c ‘ymyy z’dmwrd’ / bwj mn rw’n ’c ‘ym / z’dmwrd. 226 M38/V/7−13 (RMMP: dz, p. 196): yyšw‘knygrwšn(’) / m’rw m’ny’ yyšw‘knygrwšn / m’rw m’n(y’) tw pd mn qr <’xšd> / ’(x)šd’g rwšn’gr’ bwj’h / mn ’rw’n’ cymyy z’dmwrd’ / bwj’h mn ’rw’n’ ’cy(m)[yy] / z’d[m](w)rd… Cf. Majella Franzmann, Jesus in the Manichaean Writings (London and new York: T&T Clark, 2003), p. 44. 227 Psalm-Book 151,8−10: eix]Ntmhte Mpiam iHS arixMme Mmaï / mpwrkatotk abal Nswn je ne nximeue twrP Mman / ei]¥ateouo pekren ajNpiam ¥afcRko nefxim[eue. 47 gábor kósa Thou madest the cross a ship for thyself, thou wast the sailor on it. 228 … the cross was a ship, the souls were passengers. 229 In Manichaeism the suffering of Jesus is transposed to the suffering of the universal Living Soul, the Cross of Light, also called Jesus patibilis (Contra Faustum XX,2), which is precisely why rescue from these continuous sufferings might be connected to his other aspect, Jesus the Splendor. The first two hymns of the Hymnscroll, addressed to Jesus (Zan Yishu wen; h. 07– h. 44, h. 45− h. 82) are to a large extent based on the chains of concepts discussed here (darkness, demons, monsters, body, suffering, desire, rebirth, and sea of fire). In addition to the hymns already analyzed, the following ones also contain references to this imagery: h. 33, h. 37, h. 38, h. 39, h. 40, h. 49, h. 50, h. 52, h. 52, h. 62, h. 63. Similarly, the first, sixth, and seventh parts of the Angad r±›nƒn also include the same set of images. Though this Parthian hymn-cycle does not contain any overt reference to the figure of Jesus, W. Lentz hypothesized that he is the ultimate addressee of the Angad r±›nƒn. 230 A Summary of the Results The chart below summarizes the majority of the associations cited in this article. A lack of associations (see the small circles) means that in the data available to me I could not find an explicit example: this, however, does not necessarily mean that no such reference exists or will one day be found. The chart reveals that the majority of the Chinese images and associations can also be found in the Parthian Manichaean scriptures, which reinforces the argument for a strong relationship and interdependence. Interestingly, there are several Coptic parallels, which might indicate that some of these images go back to early periods of Manichaean religious history. Although the expression “Sea of Fire” appears only in the Chinese and the Parthian writings, the chart also shows that the majority of the associations (body, Darkness, waves, pits, poison) appear in connection with either fire or sea in other sources as well, thus it is the matrix of associations per se that becomes important. Psalm-Book 123,33: a]kRpstauros nek Njai akRneef araf. Psalm-Book 123,35: apstauros Rjai am2uyaue Rxouht. 230 Wolfgang Lentz, “Fünfzig Jahre Arbeit an den iranischen handschriften der deutschen Turfan-sammlung,” ZDMG 106 (1956), p. 18−20 [pp. 1−22]. 228 229 48 the chinese manichaean sea of fire chinese parthian sogdian coptic others 1. Body−Darkness (²z) 2. Body−Darkness−Poison 3. Darkness−Poisonous springs 4. Darkness−Pits−Depth 5. Darkness−Pits−Sea 6. Fire−Body 7. Fire−Demons 8. Fire−Sea, fountains 9. Sea−Monsters / demons − Darkness 10. Sea−Waves 11. Sea − Monsters − precious ..ship 12. Sea−demonic net 13. Sea−saving net 14. Sea−rebirth 15. Sea/fire−Deliverance 16. Fire−Pit + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ° + + + + + ° ° + + + + ° ° + + + ° + ° ° ° ° ° ° + + ° + + ° ° + ° ° + ° + + + ° ° + ° + ° ° ° ° ° + ° (“Others” include Uyghur, Latin, Greek, Arabic and Syriac sources; “Darkness” designates the Land of Darkness and the principle of Darkness.) All the presently available evidence supports W. Sundermann’s conclusion that both the Traité and the hymns of the Hymnscroll were translated from a Parthian original. 231 The Chinese transcription of P‰sˆs in h. 21, as presented earlier, suggests that P‰sˆs was transcribed from a Parthian original. Combining this fact with the shared imagery of the Chinese Zan Yishu wen and the Parthian Angad r±›nƒn, it seems clear that the first two hymns of the Hymnscroll were also translated from a Parthian original, most probably akin to the Angad r±›nƒn. In addition to the common imagery, the Parthian and the Chinese hymns also share their basic setting: after death the believer faces a desolate condition, threatened by the forces of Darkness, and only by the mercy of a Saviour can he escape these intimidations. The following motifs in the Zan Yishu wen attest that these two Chinese hymns ultimately refer to the condition experienced by the believer after his/her death: Jesus as the Righteous Judge ( h. 48), confession and forgiving sins ( h. 11, h. 27−29, h. 44, h. 46, h. 48, h. 54, h. 64), symbolic gifts of paradise ( h. 30), eliminating rebirth ( h. 33, h. 40, h. 52, h. 55, h. 62, h. 74), leading to Paradise ( h. 35, h. 40−1, h. 52). 231 Sundermann, “Iranian Manichaean Texts,” pp. 104, 118. 49 gábor kósa Despite the fact that the exact equivalent of the Chinese expression appears only in the Angad r±›nƒn, and thus historically speaking the Chinese hymn might go directly back to a Parthian original, the motifs discussed above form a general conceptual matrix of images: the Land of Darkness is an unfathomably deep, poisonous, aquatic pit (a sea, an ocean), while the creatures in it (demons, monsters, beasts) are fiery in nature (because of their greed and lust), thus together they form the Sea of Fire which is the place of suffering and rebirth for the Light, the Living Soul, and consequently also for the individual soul. nevertheless, it was only in the Chinese sources that, probably under Buddhist incfluence, the image of a Sea of Fire emerged explicitly from this set of related concepts. COnCLUSIOnS In this study I have explored the religious connotations of the paradoxical term Sea of Fire, both in Chinese and non-Chinese sources. It should be stressed that the Chinese occurrence of the compound is most probably traceable to the original Parthian one, as it does appear once in the Angad r±›nƒn. however, in this essay I have tried to sketch the religious notions and associations surrounding it, and not the exact historical roots of the particular lexic compound. The comparative textual analysis here basically aimed at clarifying the exact meaning of the compound and demonstrating the presence of its associated notions in the entire corpus of Manichaeism, from the Coptic sources to the Middle Iranian and Chinese ones. The starting point was always one of the associated Chinese notions, for which I searched for nonChinese analogies. Firstly, it should be stressed that the metaphorical use of sea (hai 海) must be distinguished from its neutral meaning, used in listing natural phenomena, as well as from its use to refer to “a huge amount” and “inexhaustibility”, both of which appear in the Traité itself. In the present study it is always the first, metaphorical usage that is the object of analysis. The motif of huohai 火海 is clearly related to the Land of Darkness. Some Chinese and non-Chinese sources depict the Land of Darkness as aquatic, and at the same time refer to the fiery nature of the creatures within. The aquatic land of Darkness is frequently linked with the figures of monsters, beasts and demons. More specifically, the unique orthography of the word makara (mojie 魔竭) and the complex motives for its use were investigated. Another motif, that of deep, dark pits, is 50 the chinese manichaean sea of fire also related to this general image. An exact equivalent of the Chinese Sea of Fire has been found in the Parthian Angad r±›nƒn (I,19). After the analysis of the Chinese and non-Chinese sources, I concluded that the meaning of the compound Sea of Fire is not the self-evident “flaming sea” but a sea populated by the monsters of Darkness, emitting the inner fire of negative forces (for example, lust, passions). This interpretation was unexpectedly reinforced by the discovery of the presently available single complete Manichaean painting which portrays monsters in the sea with fire emanating from their mouth. The body of flesh, linked with the Sea of Fire in both Chinese and non-Chinese sources, inherently belongs to the Land of Darkness, and is thus characterized by negative attributes, especially those connected with desire. Precisely for this reason the body of flesh is often associated with fire or stormy sea. Both the Chinese and the non-Chinese sources describe the image of the sea as stormy and billowy, which among other things refers to the chaotic movements of the sea, also a fundamental characteristic of the Land of Darkness, and the monsters in it. Chinese sources also correlate huohai 火海 with poisons or poisonous nature, a typical feature of the Land of Darkness. Similarly, the motif of dark, poisonous springs is a widespread image in Manichaean usage. The symbol of nets usually has negative associations which link it with the Land of Darkness, nevertheless, the only positive example (“light-net”) in the Chinese scriptures has parallels in the Coptic sources. Both the Chinese and the non-Chinese texts contain references to the motif of seamen who travel amidst tossing waves and menacing creatures to collect treasure. This treasure is the soul, which derived from the Realm of Light but is now entrapped in the human body devised as a prison by the forces of Darkness. The incarnation and the subsequent sufferings of the soul in the body has its archetypical predecessor in the descent of the First Man into the pits of Darkness and his imprisonment full of sufferings. Leading up the First Man from the Land of Darkness with help from the Realm of Light (Mother of Life, Living Spirit) can be paralleled with bringing the soul-pearls from the depths of the inimical sea to the surface with help from the Light-envoys and elects. The motifs of treasure/pearls (soul) suffering in the sea (body, Land of Darkness) and the tossing waves (cycle of rebirth) and being saved by the seamen (the elects, light-deities) are also found in the Chinese texts. In the Chinese sources the notion of rebirth is clearly related to huohai, especially to its repeatedly emerging waves, while similar de- 51 gábor kósa scriptions can be identified in the Parthian Manichaean corpus. It can be surmised that — despite the fact that huohai itself does not actually appear in Buddhist texts — Buddhist analogies of the expression (fannao dahai 煩惱大海, shengsi hai, shengsi liu, kuhai, some of them also used in Manichaean texts) might have contributed to the formation of this association, as no such link can be found in Western Manichaean texts. The rescue of the First Man from the abyss is the general archetype of light-soul/treasure being rescued from or carried over the deep and stormy sea. This deliverance from the Sea of Fire is sometimes linked with the figure of Jesus. The first two hymns of the Hymnscroll (Zan Yishu wen) are fundamentally based on this imagery. This shared imagery in turn offers some reinforcement to the hypothesis advanced by W. Lentz that the Angad r±›nƒn was addressed to Jesus. In addition to the Zan Yishu wen, the conceptual matrix connected with the image of fiery sea does make an appearance in several Manichaean texts, most prominently in the Angad r±›nƒn [I, VI, VII]. This correlates remarkably well with the conclusion reached by the Chinese transcription of P‰sˆs, and substantiates the claim that the Zan Yishu wen was also translated from a Parthian original, thus corroborating W. Sundermann’s hypothesis that Parthian was the dominant source language of Chinese Manichaean texts. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS c GSR h M MhA MhP RMMP SPAh T T. tr 52 Compendium (Moni guangfo jiaofa yilüe 摩尼光佛教法儀略 ) Klimkeit, trans., Gnosis on the Silk Road: Gnostic Texts from Central Asia Hymnscroll (Moni jiao xiabu zan 摩尼教下部讚 ) Manichaean; indicating Middle Iranian fragments (usually followed by a number) Sundermann, trans., The Manichaean Hymn-cycles Huyadagmƒn and Angad R±›nƒn in Parthian and Sogdian Boyce, The Manichaean Hymn-cycles in Parthian Boyce, A Reader in Manichaean Middle Persian and Parthian Boyce, “Some Parthian Abecedarian hymns” Turfan; indicating mss. housed in Berlin Turfan collection (obtained in four German missions to Turfan, 1902−1914 (indicated as I, II, III or IV) Taish± shinshˆ daiz±ky± 大正新修大藏經 Traité (Bosi jiao canjing 波斯教殘經 )

RELATED PAPERS

RELATED TOPICS

Log In

"The ‘Sea of Fire’ as a Chinese Manichaean Metaphor — Source Materials for Mapping an Unnoticed Image." Asia Major 24.2 (2011) 1–52.

"The ‘Sea of Fire’ as a Chinese Manichaean Metaphor — Source Materials for Mapping an Unnoticed Image." Asia Major 24.2 (2011) 1–52.

Related Papers

RELATED PAPERS

RELATED TOPICS