Mycosphaerella cruenta (leaf spot of cowpea)
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Mycosphaerella cruenta Latham
- Preferred Common Name
- leaf spot of cowpea
- Other Scientific Names
- Cercospora cruenta Sacc.
- Pseudocercospora cruenta (Sacc.) Deighton
- International Common Names
- Spanishcercosporiosis de la judía
- Frenchcercosporiose du haricot
- Local Common Names
- mancha blancamancha de cercospora
- GermanyBlattfleckenkrankheit: Bohne
- USAcercospora leaf blotch
- EPPO code
- MYCOCR (Mycosphaerella cruenta)
Pictures
Distribution
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Host | Host status | References |
---|---|---|
Calopogonium | Other | |
Lablab purpureus (hyacinth bean) | Other | |
Mucuna (velvetbeans) | Other | |
Mucuna pruriens (velvet bean) | Other | |
Phaseolus (beans) | Main | |
Vigna (cowpea) | Main | |
Vigna mungo (black gram) | Unknown | Rashtra (2017) |
Vigna radiata (mung bean) | Unknown | Rashtra (2017) |
Vigna unguiculata (cowpea) | Other | Ayala-Escobar et al. (2013) |
Symptoms
Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)On infected leaves (especially those more mature) look for brown or rust-coloured lesions that vary from circular to angular, are 2-10 mm, and may coalesce. Lesions may have a grey centre with a slightly reddish border. Conidia develop at the centre on short conidiophores. Severely affected leaves become chlorotic. Lesions may dry and portions may fall out, giving the leaf a shot-hole appearance. Lesions and blemishes may occur on branches, stems and pods.
List of Symptoms/Signs
Symptom or sign | Life stages | Sign or diagnosis |
---|---|---|
Plants/Fruit/lesions: black or brown | ||
Plants/Leaves/abnormal colours | ||
Plants/Leaves/abnormal leaf fall | ||
Plants/Leaves/fungal growth | ||
Plants/Leaves/necrotic areas | ||
Plants/Stems/discoloration of bark |
Prevention and Control
Cultural Control and Sanitary Methods
Although there is little indication that cultural practices are used to control Cercospora leaf spot and blotch, there is ample evidence that the pathogen survives on crop residues and the benefits of burying crop residues was indicated by the finding that the disease was more severe on cowpea plants grown in disk-harrowed treatments than in treatments deep-turned with a mouldboard plough, which would bury residues (Sumner and Smittle, 1979).
Host-Plant Resistance
The genes Cls1 and cls2 are unlinked and each confers resistance to M. cruenta. The resistant cowpea lines CR1 7-1-34 (Cls1Cls1) and Ala963.8 (cls2cls2) were crossed with each other and with three susceptible lines. Studies of the F1 and F2 showed that Cls1 is completely dominant and not affected by environment. The cls2 allele proved incompletely dominant under weak epiphytotic conditions and was affected by the environment when heterozygous (Fery and Dukes, 1977b)Screening for resistance to Cercospora leaf spot has often included both M. cruenta and C. cansecens that causes a related leaf spot disease on the same group of crops. During 1983-86, cowpea lines from Zambia were evaluated for their yield potential and resistance to diseases. Of 336 lines screened none were resistant to C. canescens or M. cruenta but 18 lines were moderately resistant (Kannaiyan et al., 1987). Twenty mungbean genotypes were evaluated for severity of leaf spot caused by C. canescens and M. cruenta. In general, the high yielding varieties were resistant to moderately resistant (Mejaya, 1983).
Chemical Control
M. cruenta leaf spot of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) reduced the seed yield of the susceptible cv. Colossus by 35.6%, 100-seed weight by 3.1%, number of seeds/pod by 9.6% and number of pods/plant by 25.4% compared with crops protected with benomyl and chlorothalonil sprays. The resistant breeding line CR 17-1-34 was unaffected by leaf spot and applications of benomyl/chlorothalonil (Fery et al., 1977). In fungicide field tests against M. cruenta on mungbean (Vigna radiata), benomyl reduced leaf spot considerably and prevented leaf shedding. Triarimol, mancozeb and copper hydroxide also significantly reduced leaf spotting but not leaf shedding. All fungicide treatments increased yield (Kannaiyan et al., 1974).The most cost-effective control of M. cruenta in black gram (Vigna mungo) and mung bean (Vigna radiata) was given by seed treatment with carbendazim followed by three foliar sprays of mancozeb (Mittal, 1991, 1994).
Impact
Cercospora leaf spot, caused by M. cruenta, has caused considerable yield losses in cowpeas in Nigeria where considerable efforts have been made on control of the disease (Williams, 1977). Under natural conditions, M. cruenta reduced the number of pods per plant, average number of seed per pod and average 100-seed weight of a susceptible cowpea variety by 25.4, 9.6 and 3.1%, respectively (Fery and Dukes, 1977a). Seed yield loss of cowpea was correlated with Cercospora leaf spot disease (caused by M. cruenta) severity from artificially simulated, chemically regulated and naturally occurring epidemics at Ibadan, Nigeria. Areas under disease progress curves were correlated with yield loss regardless of the shapes of the curves. The yield-loss estimation model was not accurate for low disease levels. A critical-point model was constructed and tested that related date of occurrence of specific disease severities to percentage yield loss, though this could be used only for uninterrupted disease progressions (Schneider et al., 1976).In a study in USA, M. cruenta leaf spot of cowpea reduced the seed yield of the susceptible cv. Colossus by 35.6%, 100-seed weight by 3.1%, number of seeds/pod by 9.6% and number of pods per plant by 25.4% compared with crops protected with benomyl and chlorothalonil sprays. The resistant line CR 17-1-34 was unaffected by leaf spot and applications of benomyl or chlorothalonil. Although M. cruenta is present to some degree in the US in most years, losses are slight from this pathogen (Schwartz and Pastor-Corrales, 1989).In Varanasi, India, leaf spot caused by M. cruenta was found to cause serious disease in lobiya (Vigna unguiculata) (Pant, 1989).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 16 November 2021
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.