Abstract
The modes and mechanisms of organismal attachment are numerous and diverse. Terrestrial vertebrates, however, achieve robust and releasable attachment to both abiotic and biotic substrata in three chief ways: hook-like anchors, such as claws, permit temporary attachment to surfaces via mechanical interlocking and/or frictional interactions with surface asperities; attachment organs releasing glandular secretions (e.g., the toe pads of hylid frogs, suction cups of disc-winged bats) achieve attachment via wet adhesion and/or suction; subdigital pads of some lineages of lizards possess filamentous outgrowths that induce friction and/or adhesion via molecular interactions. Lizards are the largest organisms to employ fibrillar-based attachment, but only the adhesive subdigital pads of geckos and anoles are sufficiently adhesively competent to support forces in excess of their body mass. The adhesive systems of geckos and anoles have long been considered convergent, but beyond general statements to this effect, convergence has not been rigorously assessed. Here we review what is known of the adhesive apparatus of both gekkotan and anoline lizards within the context of two hierarchically stratified domains: (1) adhesive attachment and the structure of setae and setal fields, and (2) the higher-order anatomical specializations that control the operation of the setae. We employ this information to identify the physical and organismic drivers of convergence of fibrillar adhesive systems, thereby enabling us to assess the particular, rather than superficially general, extent of convergence of the adhesive system of geckos and anoles.
Our synopsis of gekkotan and anoline setae, setal fields, and their adhesive systems reveals numerous physical and organismic constraints, perceived as the drivers of convergent evolution, that have led to similar morphological and functional outcomes. We posit that the setae and setal fields of geckos and anoles are convergent structures that enhance effective attachment to diverse substrata. Setae exhibit deep homology, arising from the convergently evolved spinulate Oberhäutchen of the epidermis. Following the initial exaptation of spinules as van der Waals adhesion-promoting setae, those of geckos and anoles followed somewhat different evolutionary pathways as the setae became organized into integrated setal fields. These pathways are reflective of differences in how the biomechanical control of the setal fields, during their application and release from the substratum, is achieved. Although anoles seemingly exhibit only a single evolutionary origin of the adhesive system, that of geckos has arisen on multiple independent occasions, with a broad range of expression of anatomical configurations that characterize the functional system. A broad survey of such configurations among geckos reveals that some are morphologically (and probably behaviorally) more similar to those of anoles than are others. Our assessment of the extent of convergence of the adhesive apparatuses of geckos and anoles identifies gekkotan taxa with an adhesive apparatus that most closely resembles that of anoles and explores what is minimally necessary to promote reversible attachment via molecular interactions. Our findings should contribute not only to ongoing investigations of the functional morphology of these adhesive systems but also should be informative to those who design biomimetic fibrillar adhesives intended to operate similarly to their natural counterparts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alibardi, L. (2009). Cell biology of adhesive setae in gecko lizards. Zoology, 112(6), 403–424.
Alibardi, L., Toni, M., & Dalla Valle, L. (2007). Expression of beta-keratin mRNAs and proline uptake in epidermal cells of growing scales and pad lamellae of gecko lizards. Journal of Anatomy, 211(1), 104–116.
Alibardi, L., Edward, D. P., Patil, L., Bouhenni, R., Dhinojwala, A., & Niewiarowski, P. H. (2011). Histochemical and ultrastructural analyses of adhesive setae of lizards indicate that they contain lipids in addition to keratins. Journal of Morphology, 272(6), 758–768.
Arzt, E., Gorb, S., & Spolenak, R. (2003). From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(19), 10603–10606.
Autumn, K. (2006). Principles and parameters of the gecko adhesive system. In A. M. Smith & J. A. Calow (Eds.), Biological adhesives (pp. 225–256). Springer.
Autumn, K., & Hansen, W. (2006). Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 192(11), 1205–1212.
Autumn, K., & Peattie, A. M. (2002). Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 42(6), 1081–1090.
Autumn, K., Liang, Y. A., Hsieh, S. T., Zesch, W., Chan, W. P., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R., & Full, R. J. (2000). Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 405(6787), 681–685.
Autumn, K., Sitti, M., Liang, Y. A., Peattie, A. M., Hansen, W. R., Sponberg, S., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R., Israelachvili, J. N., & Full, R. J. (2002). Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(19), 12252–12256.
Autumn, K., Majidi, C., Groff, R. E., Dittmore, A., & Fearing, R. (2006a). Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 209(18), 3558–3568.
Autumn, K., Hsieh, S. T., Dudek, D. M., Chen, J., Chitaphan, C., & Full, R. J. (2006b). Dynamics of geckos running vertically. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 260–272.
Autumn, K., Niewiarowski, P. H., & Puthoff, J. B. (2014). Gecko adhesion as a model system for integrative biology, interdisciplinary science, and bioinspired engineering. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 45(1), 445–470.
Barnes, W. J. P., Oines, C., & Smith, J. M. (2006). Whole animal measurements of shear and adhesive forces in adult tree frogs: insights into underlying mechanisms of adhesion obtained from studying the effects of size and scale. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 192, 1179–1191.
Bartlett, M. D., Croll, A. B., King, D. R., Paret, B. M., Irschick, D. J., & Crosby, A. J. (2012). Looking beyond fibrillar features to scale gecko-like adhesion. Advanced Materials, 24(8), 1078–1083.
Bauer, A. M. (1998). Morphology of the adhesive tail tips of carphodactyline geckos (Reptilia: Diplodactylidae). Journal of Morphology, 235(1), 41–58.
Bergmann, P. J., & Irschick, D. J. (2005). Effects of temperature on maximum clinging ability in a diurnal gecko: Evidence for a passive clinging mechanism? The Journal of Experimental Zoology A, 303(9), 785–791.
Bhushan, B., Peressadko, A. G., & Kim, T.-W. (2006). Adhesion analysis of two-level hierarchical morphology in natural attachment systems for “smart adhesion”. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 20(13), 1475–1491.
Bloch, N., & Irschick, D. J. (2005). Toe-clipping dramatically reduces clinging performance in a pad-bearing lizard (Anolis carolinensis). Journal of Herpetology, 39(2), 288–293.
Brinkman, D. B. (1980). Structural correlates of tarsal and metatarsal functioning in Iguana (Lacertilia: Iguanidae) and other lizards. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 58, 277–289.
Chen, B., & Gao, H. (2010). An alternative explanation of the effect of humidity in gecko adhesion: Stiffness reduction enhances adhesion on a rough surface. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2, 1–9.
Delannoy, S. M. (2005). Subdigital setae of the Tokay gecko (Gekko gecko): Variation in form and implications for adhesion. MSc Thesis. Department of Biological Science, University of Calgary.
Donihue, C. M., Herrel, A., Fabre, A.-C., Kamath, A., Geneva, A. J., Schoener, T. W., Kolbe, J. J., & Losos, J. B. (2018). Hurricane-induced selection on the morphology of an island lizard. Nature, 560(7716), 88–91.
Elstrott, J., & Irschick, D. J. (2004). Evolutionary correlations among morphology, habitat use and clinging performance in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 83(3), 389–398.
Ernst, V., & Ruibal, R. (1966). The structure and development of the digital lamellae of lizards. Journal of Morphology, 120(3), 233–265.
Federle, W. (2006). Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? The Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 2611–2621.
Fuller, K. N. G., & Tabor, D. (1975). The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 345(1642), 327–342.
Gamble, T., Greenbaum, E., Jackman, T. R., Russell, A. P., & Bauer, A. M. (2012). Repeated origin and loss of adhesive toepads in geckos. PLoS One, 7, e39429.
Gamble, T., Greenbaum, E., Jackman, T. R., Russell, A. P., & Bauer, A. M. (2017). Repeated evolution of digital adhesion in geckos: A reply to Harrington and Reeder. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 30, 1429–1436.
Gans, C. (1969). Functional components versus mechanical units in descriptive morphology. Journal of Morphology, 128, 365–368.
Garner, A. M., Lopez, S. M., & Niewiarowski, P. H. (2017). Brown anole (Anolis sagrei) adhesive forces remain unaffected by partial claw clipping. Acta Herpetologica, 12, 133–137.
Garner, A. M., Wilson, M. C., Russell, A. P., Dhinojwala, A., & Niewiarowski, P. H. (2019a). Going out on a limb: how investigation of the anoline adhesive system can enhance our understanding of fibrillary adhesion. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59, 61–69.
Garner, A. M., Buo, C., Piechowski, J. M., Pamfilie, A. M., Stefanovic, S. R., Dhinojwala, A., & Niewiarowski, P. H. (2019b). Digital hyperextension has no influence on the active self-drying of gecko adhesive subdigital pads. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A, 332, 118–125.
Garner, A. M., Wilson, M. C., Wright, C., Russell, A. P., Niewiarowski, P. H., & Dhinojwala, A. (2021). The same but different: setal arrays of anoles and geckos indicate alternative approaches to achieving similar adhesive effectiveness. Journal of Anatomy, 238, 1143–1155.
Gillies, A. G., Henry, A., Lin, H., Ren, A., Shiuan, K., Fearing, R. S., & Full, R. J. (2014). Gecko toe and lamellar shear adhesion on macroscopic engineered rough surfaces. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 217, 283–289.
Gorb, S. N. (2008). Biological attachment devices: Exploring nature’s diversity for biomimetics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366(1870), 1557–1574.
Gorb, S. N., & Beutel, R. G. (2001). Evolution of locomotory attachment pads in hexapods. Naturwissenschaften, 88, 530–534.
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation – A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.
Green, D. M. (1981). Adhesion and the toe-pads of tree frogs. Copeia, 1981(4), 790–796.
Greiner, C., Spolenak, R., & Arzt, E. (2009). Adhesion design maps for fibrillar adhesives: The effect of shape. Acta Biomaterialia, 5(2), 597–606.
Haefner, J. W. (1988). Assembly rules for Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Oecologia, 74, 551–565.
Hagey, T. J. (2013). Mechanics, diversity, and ecology of gecko adhesion. Doctoral dissertation. University of Idaho.
Hagey, T. J., Uyeda, J. C., Crandell, K. E., Cheney, J. A., Autumn, K., & Harmon, L. J. (2017). Tempo and mode of performance evolution across multiple independent origins of adhesive toe pads in lizards. Evolution, 71, 2344–2358.
Hansen, W. R., & Autumn, K. (2005). Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(2), 385–389.
Harrington, S., & Reeder, T. W. (2017). Rate heterogeneity across Squamata, misleading ancestral state reconstruction and the importance of proper null model specification. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 30, 313–325.
Higham, T. E., Russell, A. P., & Niklas, K. J. (2017a). Leaping lizards landing on leaves: Escape-induced jumps in the rainforest canopy challenge the adhesive limits of geckos. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14, 20170156.
Higham, T. E., Gamble, T., & Russell, A. P. (2017b). On the origin of frictional adhesion in geckos: small morphological changes lead to a major biomechanical transition in the genus Gonatodes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 120, 503–517.
Higham, T. E., Russell, A. P., Niewiarowski, P. H., Wright, A., & Speck, T. (2019). The ecomechanics of gecko adhesion: Natural surface topography, evolution, and biomimetics. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59(1), 148–167.
Home, E. (1816). Some account of the feet of those animals whose progressive motion can be carried on in opposition to gravity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 106, 149–155 + plates VII and VIII.
Hsu, P. Y., Ge, L., Li, X., Stark, A. Y., Wesdemiotis, C., Niewiarowski, P. H., & Dhinojwala, A. (2012). Direct evidence of phospholipids in gecko footprints and spatula-substrate contact interface detected using surface-sensitive spectroscopy. The Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 9(69), 657–664.
Hu, S., Lopez, S., Niewiarowski, P. H., & Xia, Z. (2012). Dynamic self-cleaning in gecko setae via digital hyperextension. The Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 9(76), 2781–2790.
Irschick, D. J., Austin, C. C., Petren, K., Fisher, R. N., Losos, J. B., & Ellers, O. (1996). A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad-bearing lizards. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 59(1), 21–35.
Irschick, D. J., Carlisle, E., Elstrott, J., Ramos, M., Buckley, C., Vanhooydonck, B., Meyers, J. A. Y., & Herrel, A. (2005). A comparison of habitat use, morphology, clinging performance and escape behaviour among two divergent green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis) populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 85(2), 223–234.
Johnson, M. K., & Russell, A. P. (2009). Configuration of the setal fields of Rhoptropus (Gekkota: Gekkonidae): Functional, evolutionary, ecological and phylogenetic implications of observed pattern. Journal of Anatomy, 214(6), 937–955.
Kendall, K. (1975). Thin-film peeling-the elastic term. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 8(13), 1449–1452.
Khanafer, K., Duprey, A., Schlicht, M., & Berguer, R. (2008). Effects of strain rate, mixing ratio, and stress–strain definition on the mechanical behavior of the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) material as related to its biological applications. Biomedical Microdevices, 11(2), 503.
Khannoon, E. R., Endlein, T., Russell, A. P., & Autumn, K. (2014). Experimental evidence for friction-enhancing integumentary modifications of chameleons and associated functional and evolutionary implications. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 281(1775), 20132334.
Kim, T. W., & Bhushan, B. (2007). Adhesion analysis of multi-level hierarchical attachment system contacting with a rough surface. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 21(1), 1–20.
Koppetsch, T., Böhme, W., Büsse, S., & Gorb, S. N. (2020). Comparative epidermal microstructure anatomy and limb and tail osteology of eyelid geckos (Squamata: Eublepharidae): Implications of ecomorphological adaptations. Zoologischer Anzeiger. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2020.05.005
Kuhn, A., Skipwith, P., & Overcast, I. (2020). Digest: an emerging model system for understanding ecomorphological convergence. Evolution, 74, 696–697.
Labonte, D., Clemente, C. J., Dittrich, A., Kuo, C. Y., Crosby, A. J., Irschick, D. J., & Federle, W. (2016). Extreme positive allometry of animal adhesive pads and the size limits of adhesion-based climbing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(5), 1297–1302.
Lange, B. (1931). Integument der Sauropsiden. In L. Bolk, E. Göppert, E. Kallius, & W. Lubosch (Eds.), Handbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie der Wirbeltiere (pp. 375–448). Urban und Schwarzenberg.
Langowski, J. K., Dodou, D., Kamperman, M., & van Leeuwen, J. L. (2018). Tree frog attachment: Mechanisms, challenges, and perspectives. Frontiers in Zoology, 15(1), 32.
Lauff, R. F., Russell, A. P., & Bauer, A. M. (1993). Topography of the digital cutaneous sensilla of the Tokay gecko, Gekko gecko (Reptilia, Gekkonidae), and their potential role in locomotion. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71, 2462–2472.
Lillywhite, H. B., & Maderson, P. F. A. (1968). Histological changes in the epidermis of the subdigital lamellae of Anolis carolinensis during the shedding cycle. Journal of Morphology, 125, 379–401.
Liu, Y., Zhou, Q., Wang, Y., Luo, L., Yang, J., Yang, L., Liu, M., Li, Y., Quian, T., Zheng, Y., Li, M., Li, J., Gu, Y., Han, Z., Man, X., Wang, Y., Zhu, C., Yu, B., Yang, Y., Ding, F., Jiang, J., Yang, H., & Gu, X. (2015). Gekko japonicus genome reveals evolution of adhesive toe pads and tail regeneration. Nature Communications, 6, 10033.
Losos, J. B. (2011). Lizards in an evolutionary tree: Ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. University of California Press.
Macrini, T. E., Irschick, D. J., & Losos, J. B. (2003). Ecomorphological differences in toepad characteristics between mainland and island anoles. Journal of Herpetology, 37(1), 52–58.
Maddin, H. C., Eckhart, L., Jaeger, K., Russell, A. P., & Ghannadan, M. (2009). The anatomy and development of the claws of Xenopus laevis (Amphibia: Anura) reveal alternate pathways of structural evolution of the integument in tetrapods. Journal of Anatomy, 214, 607–619.
Maderson, P. F. A. (1970). Lizard glands and lizard hands: Models for evolutionary study. Forma et Functio, 3, 179–204.
Maderson, P. F. A., Zucker, A. H., & Roth, S. I. (1978). Epidermal regeneration and percutaneous water loss following cellophane stripping of reptile epidermis. The Journal of Experimental Zoology, 204, 11–32.
Murphy, M. P., Kim, S., & Sitti, M. (2009). Enhanced adhesion by gecko-inspired hierarchical fibrillar adhesives. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 1(4), 849–855.
Nachtigall, W. (1974). Biological mechanisms of attachment: The comparative morphology and bioengineering of organs for linkage, suction and adhesion. Springer.
Naylor, E. R., & Higham, T. E. (2019). Attachment beyond the adhesive system: The contribution of claws to gecko clinging and locomotion. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58, 168–181.
Niewiarowski, P. H., Stark, A. Y., & Dhinojwala, A. (2016). Sticking to the story: Outstanding challenges in gecko-inspired adhesives. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 219(7), 912–919.
Niewiarowski, P. H., Stark, A. Y., & Dhinojwala, A. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of gecko adhesion: A view of its origins and current directions. In L. Heepe, L. Xue, & S. N. Gorb (Eds.), Bio-inspired structured adhesives (pp. 1–19). Springer.
Niewiarowski, P. H., Dhinojwala, A., & Garner, A. M. (2019). A physical model approach to gecko adhesion opportunity and constraint: How rough could it be? Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59(1), 203–213.
Peattie, A. M., & Full, R. J. (2007). Phylogenetic analysis of the scaling of wet and dry biological fibrillar adhesives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(47), 18595–18600.
Peressadko, A., & Gorb, S. N. (2004). When less is more: Experimental evidence for tenacity enhancement by division of contact area. The Journal of Adhesion, 80, 247–261.
Persson, B. N. J. (2003). On the mechanism of adhesion in biological systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 118(16), 7614–7621.
Pesika, N. S., Zeng, H., Kristiansen, K., Zhao, B., Tian, Y., Autumn, K., & Israelachvili, J. (2009). Gecko adhesion pad: A smart surface? Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter, 21(46), 464132.
Peterson, J. A. (1983a). The evolution of the subdigital pad in Anolis. I. Comparisons among the anoline genera. In Advances in herpetology and evolutionary biology: Essays in honor of Ernest E. Williams. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University.
Peterson, J. A. (1983b). The evolution of the subdigital pad of Anolis 2. Comparisons among the iguanid genera related to the anolines and a view from outside the radiation. Journal of Herpetology, 371–397.
Peterson, J. A., & Williams, E. E. (1981). A case history in retrograde evolution: the onca lineage in anoline lizards: II. Subdigital fine structure. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 149, 215–268.
Pinto, B., Colli, G., Higham, T., Russell, A. P., Scantlebury, D., Vitt, L., & Gamble, T. (2018). Population genetic structure and species delimitation of a widespread, Neotropical dwarf gecko. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 133, 54–66.
Prowse, M. S., Wilkinson, M., Puthoff, J. B., Mayer, G., & Autumn, K. (2011). Effects of humidity on the mechanical properties of gecko setae. Acta Biomaterialia, 7, 733–738.
Puthoff, J. B., Prowse, M. S., Wilkinson, M., & Autumn, K. (2010). Changes in materials properties explain the effects of humidity on gecko adhesion. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 213, 3699–3704.
Rewcastle, S. C. (1980). Form and function of the lacertilian knee and mesotarsal joints – A contribution to the analysis of sprawling locomotion. Journal of Zoology, 191, 147–170.
Rewcastle, S. C. (1983). Fundamental adaptations in the lacertilian hind limb: A partial analysis of the sprawling limb posture and gait. Copeia, 1983, 476–487.
Riskin, D. K., & Fenton, M. B. (2001). Sticking ability in Spix’s disc-winged bat, Thryroptera tricolor (Microchiroptera: Thryropteridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 2261–2267.
Roach, M. (2003). Stiff: The curious lives of human cadavers. W.W. Norton and Company.
Rosenberg, H. I., & Rose, R. (1999). Volar adhesive pads of the feathertail glider, Acrobates pygmaeus (Marsupialia; Acrobatidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77, 233–248.
Ruibal, R. (1968). The ultrastructure of the surface of lizard scales. Copeia, 1968(4), 698–703.
Ruibal, R., & Ernst, V. (1965). The structure of the digital setae of lizards. Journal of Morphology, 117(3), 271–293.
Russell, A. P. (1975). A contribution to the functional analysis of the foot of the Tokay, Gekko gecko (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Journal of Zoology, 176(4), 437–476.
Russell, A. P. (1976). Some comments concerning interrelationships amongst gekkonine geckos. In Bellairs, A.d’A., Cox, C.B. (Eds.) Morphology and biology of reptiles. Linnean Symposium Series No. 3 (pp. 217–244). Academic.
Russell, A. P. (1981). Descriptive and functional anatomy of the digital vascular system of the Tokay, Gekko gecko. Journal of Morphology, 169, 293–323.
Russell, A. P. (1986). The morphological basis of weight-bearing in the scansors of the Tokay gecko (Gekko gecko). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 64, 948–955.
Russell, A. P. (2002). Integrative functional morphology of the gekkotan adhesive system (Reptilia: Gekkota). Integrative and Comparative Biology, 42(6), 1154–1163.
Russell, A. P. (2016). The structure of anoline (Reptilia: Dactyloidae: Anolis) toe pads in relation to substratum conformity. Acta Zoologica, 98, 300–309.
Russell, A. P., & Bauer, A. M. (1988). Paraphalangeal elements of gekkonid lizards: a comparative survey. Journal of Morphology, 197, 221–240.
Russell, A. P., & Bauer, A. M. (1990). Digit I in pad-bearing gekkonine geckos: Alternate designs and the potential constraints of phalangeal number. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 29, 453–472.
Russell, A. P., & Bauer, A. M. (2008). The appendicular locomotor apparatus of Sphenodon and normal-limbed squamates. In C. Gans, A. S. Gaunt, & K. Adler (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia (Vol. 1, pp. 1–466). Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles.
Russell, A. P., & Bels, V. (2001). Digital hyperextension in Anolis sagrei. Herpetologica, 57(1), 58–65.
Russell, A. P., & Johnson, M. K. (2007). Real-world challenges to, and capabilities of, the gekkotan adhesive system: contrasting the rough and the smooth. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 85, 1228–1238.
Russell, A. P., & Delaugerre, M.-J. (2017). Left in the dust: Differential effectiveness of the two adhesive pad configurations in geckos (Reptilia: Gekkota). Journal of Zoology, 301, 61–68.
Russell, A. P., & Eslinger, A. (2017). A whole lamella perspective on the origin of the epidermal free margin of Anolis (Reptilia: Dactyloidae) toe pads. Journal of Morphology, 278(3), 360–368.
Russell, A. P., & Gamble, T. (2019). Evolution of the gekkotan adhesive system: Does digit anatomy point to one or more origins? Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59, 131–147.
Russell, A. P., & Johnson, M. K. (2014). Between a rock and a soft place: Microtopography of the locomotor substrate and morphology of the setal fields of Namibian day geckos (Gekkota: Gekkonidae: Rhoptropus). Acta Zoologica, 95, 299–318.
Russell, A. P., & Oetelaar, G. S. (2016). Limb and digit orientation during vertical clinging in Bibron’s gecko, Chondrodactylus bibronii (A. Smith, 1846) and its bearing on the adhesive capabilities of geckos. Acta Zoologica, 97, 345–360.
Russell, A. P., Bauer, A. M., & Laroiya, R. (1997). Morphological correlates of the secondarily symmetrical pes of gekkotan lizards. Journal of Zoology, 241, 767–790.
Russell, A. P., Johnson, M. K., & Delannoy, S. M. (2007). Insights from studies of gecko-inspired adhesion and their impact on our understanding of the evolution of the gekkotan adhesive system. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 21(12–13), 1119–1143.
Russell, A. P., Baskerville, J., Gamble, T., & Higham, T. E. (2015). The evolution of digit form in Gonatodes (Gekkota: Sphaerodactylidae) and its bearing on the transition from frictional to adhesive contact in gekkotans. Journal of Morphology, 276, 1311–1332.
Russell, A. P., Stark, A. Y., & Higham, T. E. (2019). The integrative biology of gecko adhesion: historical review, current understanding and grand challenges. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59, 101–116.
Sawyer, R. H., Glenn, T., French, J. O., Mays, B., Shames, R. B., Barnes, G. L., Jr., Rhodes, W., & Ishikawa, Y. (2000). The expression of beta (β) keratins in the epidermal appendages of reptiles and birds. American Zoologist, 40, 530–539.
Song, Y., Dai, Z., Wang, Z., & Full, R. J. (2020). Role of multiple, adjustable toes in distributed control shown by sideways wall-running in geckos. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287(1926), 20200123.
Spinner, M., Westhoff, G., & Gorb, S. N. (2014). Subdigital setae of chameleon feet: friction-enhancing microstructures for a wide range of substrate roughness. Scientific Reports, 4, 5481.
Stark, A. Y., & Mitchell, C. T. (2019). Stick or slip: Adhesive performance of geckos and gecko-inspired synthetics in wet environments. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59, 214–226.
Stark, A. Y., Sullivan, T. W., & Niewiarowski, P. H. (2012). The effect of surface water and wetting on gecko adhesion. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 215(17), 3080–3086.
Stark, A. Y., Badge, I., Wucinich, N. A., Sullivan, T. W., Niewiarowski, P. H., & Dhinojwala, A. (2013). Surface wettability plays a significant role in gecko adhesion underwater. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(16), 6340–6345.
Stark, A. Y., Wucinich, N. A., Paoloni, E. L., Niewiarowski, P. H., & Dhinojwala, A. (2014). Self-drying: A gecko’s innate ability to remove water from wet toe pads. PLoS One, 9(7), e101885.
Stark, A. Y., Klittich, M. R., Sitti, M., Niewiarowski, P. H., & Dhinojwala, A. (2016). The effect of temperature and humidity on adhesion of gecko-inspired adhesives: implications for the natural system. Scientific Reports, 6, 30936.
Stewart, G. R., & Daniel, R. S. (1972). Scales of the lizard Gekko gecko: surface structure examined with the scanning electron microscope. Copeia, 1972, 252–257.
Tornier, G. (1899). Ein Eidechsenschwanz mit Saugscheibe. Biologisches Zentralblatt, 19, 549–552.
Vogel, S. (1988). Life’s devices: The physical world of animals and plants. Princeton University Press.
Webster, N. B., Johnson, M. K., & Russell, A. P. (2009). Ontogenetic scaling of scansorial surface area and setal dimensions of Chondrodactlus bibronii (Gekkota: Gekkonidae): Testing predictions derived from cross-species comparisons of gekkotans. Acta Zoologica, 90, 18–29.
Williams, E. E., & Peterson, J. A. (1982). Convergent and alternative designs in the digital adhesive pads of scincid lizards. Science, 215(4539), 1509–1511.
Wimsatt, W. A., & Villa-R, B. (1970). Locomotor adaptations of the disc-winged bat Thryroptera tricolor. I. Functional organization of the adhesive discs. The American Journal of Anatomy, 129, 89–120.
Yao, H., & Gao, H. (2006). Mechanics of robust and releasable adhesion in biology: Bottom-up designed hierarchical structures of gecko. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 54(6), 1120–1146.
Zweers, G. A. (1979). Explanation of structure by optimization and systemization. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 29, 418–440.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Russell, A.P., Garner, A.M. (2023). Solutions to a Sticky Problem: Convergence of the Adhesive Systems of Geckos and Anoles (Reptilia: Squamata). In: Bels, V.L., Russell, A.P. (eds) Convergent Evolution. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11441-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11441-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11440-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11441-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)