Skip to main content
Log in

A Numerical Investigation of an Abnormal Phenomenon of Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) in a Cracked T-Butt Joint Accounting for Welding Effect

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Application Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industry design standards such as BS 7910 deployed some empirical formulas for the prediction of stress intensity factor (SIF) based on simulation results from traditional finite element method (FEM). However, such FEM simulation occasionally failed to convince people due to the large discrepancies compared with engineering practice. As a consequence, inaccuracy predictions via such formulas in engineering standards inevitably occur, which will compromise the safety of structures. In our previous research work, an abnormal phenomenon of SIF in a cracked T-butt joint accounting for welding effect has been observed. Compared with BS 7910, the calculation results of SIF at the surface points of welded specimens cannot be well predicted, with a large discrepancy appearing. In order to explore such problem with an abnormal increase at the surface points of cracked welded specimens, a numerical investigation in terms of SIF among BS 7910, XFEM, and FEM is performed in this paper. Numerical models on both a simple cracked plate without welding effect and a cracked T-butt joint with welding effect are developed through ABAQUS. Parametric studies in terms of the effects of varied crack depth to thickness ratio (a/T) and the effects of crack depth to crack half-length ratio (a/c) are carried out. Empirical solutions from BS 7910 are used for comparison. It is found that the XFEM can provide predictions of SIF at both the crack deepest point and crack surface point of a simple cracked plate as accurate as FEM. For a T-butt joint with a transverse stiffener, a large discrepancy in terms of the weld magnification factors (Mk) occurs at the crack surface point compared with empirical predictions. An exceptional increase of von Mises stress gradient in regions close to the weld-toe is found through the simulation of FEM, whereas a constant stress gradient is obtained through XFEM. The comparison results indicate an inappropriate prediction of SIF by the utilization of the empirical formulas in BS 7910. A more reasonable prediction of the SIF at the surface point of a crack is obtained by the XFEM. Therefore, further updating of the empirical solutions in BS 7910 for SIF accounting for welding effect is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessi L, Correia J, Fantuzzi N (2019) Initial design phase and tender designs of a jacket structure converted into a retrofitted offshore wind turbine. Energies 12(4):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Areias P, Belytschko T (2005a) Analysis of three-dimensional crack initiation and propagation using the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 63(5):760–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Areias P, Belytschko T (2005b) Non-linear analysis of shells with arbitrary evolving cracks using xfem. Int J Numer Methods Eng 62(3):384–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45(5):601–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergara A, Dorado J, Martin-Meizoso A, Martínez-Esnaola J (2017) Fatigue crack propagation in complex stress fields: Experiments and numerical simulations using the extended finite element method (XFEM). Int J Fatigue 103:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowness D, Lee M (1996) Stress intensity factor solutions for semi-elliptical weld-toe cracks in T-butt geometries. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 19(6):787–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowness D, Lee M (2000) Prediction of weld toe magnification factors for semi-elliptical cracks in T–butt joints. Int J Fatigue 22(5):369–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSI (2015) Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. Tech. Rep. BS 7910:2013+A1:2015, British Standards Institute, # 14. https://doi.org/10.3403/30241230

  • Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G (2017) Residual ultimate strength of offshore metallic pipelines with structural damage–a literature review. Ships and Offshore Structures, 1037–1055

  • Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Wu W (2018a) Residual ultimate strength of damaged seamless metallic pipelines with combined dent and metal loss. Marine Structures 61:188–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Wu W (2018b) Residual ultimate strength of damaged seamless metallic pipelines with metal loss. Marine Structures 58:242–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Wu W (2018c) Residual ultimate strength of seamless metallic pipelines under a bending moment - a numerical investigation. Ocean Engineering 164:148–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva AL, Correia J, de Jesus AM, Lesiuk G, Fernandes A, Calçada R, Berto F (2019) Influence of fillet end geometry on fatigue behaviour of welded joints. Int J Fatigue 123:196–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dake Y, Sridhar I, Zhongmin X, Kumar SB (2012) Fracture capacity of girth welded pipelines with 3D surface cracks subjected to biaxial loading conditions. Int J Press Vessel Pip 92:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolbow J, Moës N, Belytschko T (2001) An extended finite element method for modeling crack growth with frictional contact. Computer Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(51-52):6825–6846

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford Jr LN, Hilton PD (1978) Stress intensity factors by enriched finite elements. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 10(3):485–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giner E, Sukumar N, Denia F, Fuenmayor F (2008) Extended finite element method for fretting fatigue crack propagation. Int J Solids Struct 45(22-23):5675–5687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Jiang X, Hopman H, Zhu L, Liu Z (2020) An investigation on the circumferential surface crack growth in steel pipes subjected to fatigue bending. Theor Appl Fract Mech 105:102403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin X, Smith R (1999) Finite element modelling of fatigue crack growth of surface cracked plates: Part III: Stress intensity factor and fatigue crack growth life. Eng Fract Mech 63(5):541–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melenk JM, Babuška I (1996) The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139(1-4):289–314

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46(1):131–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Newman Jr J, Raju I (1979) Analysis of surface cracks in finite plates under tension or bending loads. Tech. rep., Langley Research Center, Virginia, United States, NASA Technical Paper 1578

  • Newman Jr J, Raju I (1981) An empirical stress-intensity factor equation for the surface crack. Eng Fract Mech 15(1-2):185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris PC, Gomez MP, Anderson WE (1961) A rational analytic theory of fatigue. The Trends of Engineering 13:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Schijve J (2001) Fatigue of structures and materials. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Shi J, Chopp D, Lua J, Sukumar N, Belytschko T (2010) Abaqus implementation of extended finite element method using a level set representation for three-dimensional fatigue crack growth and life predictions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 77(14):2840–2863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley RJ, Becker WT (2002) Failure analysis and prevention. ASM Handbook 11, 508

  • Shiratori M, Miyoshi T (1986) Analysis of stress intensity factors for surface cracks subjected to arbitrarily distributed stresses. In: Computational Mechanics’ 86. Springer, pp 1027–1032

  • Silva A, De Jesus A, Xavier J, Correia J, Fernandes A (2017) Combined analytical-numerical methodologies for the evaluation of mixed-mode (I+ II) fatigue crack growth rates in structural steels. Eng Fract Mech 185:124–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simulia D (2016) ABAQUS v6.14 - Documentation. ABAQUS. http://130.149.89.49:2080/v6.14/

  • Singh I, Mishra B, Bhattacharya S, Patil R (2012) The numerical simulation of fatigue crack growth using extended finite element method. Int J Fatigue 36(1):109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar N, Moës N, Moran B, Belytschko T (2000) Extended finite element method for three-dimensional crack modelling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48(11):1549–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar N, Prévost J-H (2003) Modeling quasi-static crack growth with the extended finite element method part I: Computer implementation. Int J Solids Struct 40(26):7513–7537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura G, Budyn E, Belytschko T (2003) Vector level sets for description of propagating cracks in finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(10):1571–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X (2002) Stress intensity factors and weight functions for deep semi-elliptical surface cracks in finite-thickness plates. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 25(3):291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zettlemoyer N, Fisher J (1977) Stress gradient correction factor for stress intensity at welded stiffeners and cover plates. Welding Journal 56(12):3938–3985

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Tan T, Xiao Z, Zhang W, Ariffin M (2016) Failure assessment on offshore girth welded pipelines due to corrosion defects. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 39(4):453–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Rob Pijper and Rene Bakker from Lloyd’s Register in Rotterdam, who have provided great support for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Cai.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Highlights

∙ An abnormal phenomenon of SIF in a cracked T-butt joint accounting for welding effect has been observed and investigated.

∙ Compared to BS7910, the large discrepancy of SIF at the surface points of the welded T-butt joints with semi-elliptical cracks has been numerically investigated by both XFEM and FEM. ∙ Parametric studies in terms of the varied crack depth to thickness ratio and the crack depth to crack half-length ratio are carried out.

∙ The research in this paper indicates a possible inaccuracy estimation of SIF at the crack surface point in a T-butt joint by BS7910, which requires a potential updating.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schiaretti, M., Cai, J., Jiang, X. et al. A Numerical Investigation of an Abnormal Phenomenon of Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) in a Cracked T-Butt Joint Accounting for Welding Effect. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 20, 343–353 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-021-00199-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-021-00199-x

Keywords

Navigation